#CarneyStandsStrong #BullyPolitics #PowerofthePowerless
"We are building a new order that recognizes our values; honesty, democracy, respect for human rights, sovereignty, territorial integrity, and rejection of living in a lie.
![Coercion as Trump’s Consistent Deal-Making Strategy
Researched and curated by andy J.S. Decepida
Donald Trump’s public record suggests that he learned from the combative tactics of his mentor Roy Cohn that “winning” requires intimidation. As a young real-estate developer, Trump absorbed Cohn’s ruthless rules: always “attack first and incessantly, using threats, insults, and lawsuits”1 and never apologize or concede defeat5. Cohn taught Trump to treat every negotiation as a zero-sum battle — “the rules of war” as Cohn’s protégé Roger Stone put it5. This ethos —attack, deny, and claim victory— became a template for Trump’s approach across business and politics. Observers note that Trump “absorbs and echoes” Cohn’s win-at-all-costs ethos and is “willing to lie, cheat, [and] steal” to succeed1,5. In short, the man who was groomed under Cohn’s tutelage took away a straightforward lesson: use power and fear to get your way.
Coercion in Business Deals
Trump’s business career is studded with examples of hardball tactics. In property development, he frequently used litigation and threats to push through deals. One analyst notes Trump “has been known to use aggressive rhetoric, personal attacks, and threats of legal action against critics, opponents, and even members of his party,” drawing a comparison to a mafia boss’s tactics2. For example, Trump secured the Grand Hyatt hotel in New York by demanding tax abatements through what critics call “bullying and coercion” of city officials1. In numerous partnerships (from casinos to hotels) Trump threatened lawsuits or financial ruin if partners didn’t accede to his terms. He often declared victories regardless of actual outcomes, reflecting Cohn’s dictum to “always claim victory” even when he “loses”1. In practice, then, Trump’s business “deals” were frequently ultimatums:](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:wnhlwfb44kfyi4gb6yc2tvbz/bafkreiba7jly4vvmxhmufamqiy3tnynfvzn5oab26lezelkhnlkzhv5qme)
Coercion as Trump’s Consistent Deal-Making Strategy Researched and curated by andy J.S. Decepida Donald Trump’s public record suggests that he learned from the combative tactics of his mentor Roy Cohn that “winning” requires intimidation. As a young real-estate developer, Trump absorbed Cohn’s ruthless rules: always “attack first and incessantly, using threats, insults, and lawsuits”1 and never apologize or concede defeat5. Cohn taught Trump to treat every negotiation as a zero-sum battle — “the rules of war” as Cohn’s protégé Roger Stone put it5. This ethos —attack, deny, and claim victory— became a template for Trump’s approach across business and politics. Observers note that Trump “absorbs and echoes” Cohn’s win-at-all-costs ethos and is “willing to lie, cheat, [and] steal” to succeed1,5. In short, the man who was groomed under Cohn’s tutelage took away a straightforward lesson: use power and fear to get your way. Coercion in Business Deals Trump’s business career is studded with examples of hardball tactics. In property development, he frequently used litigation and threats to push through deals. One analyst notes Trump “has been known to use aggressive rhetoric, personal attacks, and threats of legal action against critics, opponents, and even members of his party,” drawing a comparison to a mafia boss’s tactics2. For example, Trump secured the Grand Hyatt hotel in New York by demanding tax abatements through what critics call “bullying and coercion” of city officials1. In numerous partnerships (from casinos to hotels) Trump threatened lawsuits or financial ruin if partners didn’t accede to his terms. He often declared victories regardless of actual outcomes, reflecting Cohn’s dictum to “always claim victory” even when he “loses”1. In practice, then, Trump’s business “deals” were frequently ultimatums:
![cooperate or be crushed. This pattern extended beyond any single project — it became his standard negotiating style.
Controlling the Narrative: Media and Press
Trump’s coercive instincts also manifested in his dealings with the media. He openly branded critical press outlets as “enemies” and used legal intimidation to coerce favorable coverage. By 2025 he had sued or threatened lawsuits against major news organizations (for example, The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and even the BBC) after negative reports, pressuring them to retract or settle3. Trump’s administration also dismantled independent media outlets to tighten control: one of his first acts was to defund or shut down government-backed broadcasters like Voice of America3. Observers dubbed this effort “media capture,” noting it relied on “threats and intimidation” to bend the press to the administration’s will3. Even routine journalism was attacked: at a Justice Department speech Trump called investigative reporting “illegal” and bluntly ordered it to stop7. In short, Trump’s default was not to debate unfavourable facts but to bully media organizations into silence or compliance.
Domestic Governance: Loyalty and Intimidation
In the halls of government, Trump treated loyalty as paramount and viewed dissent as betrayal. He famously told aides before taking office that the single trait he prized was personal loyalty6, and his presidency proved it. Advisors who questioned him found themselves marginalized or fired. Early on, for example, Trump privately implored FBI Director James Comey to drop the investigation of an aide, asking him to “see [his] way clear to letting this go”6 — a thinly veiled demand for compliance with Trump’s personal interests. Those who did not “prove themselves” often faced public shaming or career consequences.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:wnhlwfb44kfyi4gb6yc2tvbz/bafkreifdx4gilyttwmtdijtbj7cxc3v655kwfm32r4ryllqnhnzcerhevm)
cooperate or be crushed. This pattern extended beyond any single project — it became his standard negotiating style. Controlling the Narrative: Media and Press Trump’s coercive instincts also manifested in his dealings with the media. He openly branded critical press outlets as “enemies” and used legal intimidation to coerce favorable coverage. By 2025 he had sued or threatened lawsuits against major news organizations (for example, The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and even the BBC) after negative reports, pressuring them to retract or settle3. Trump’s administration also dismantled independent media outlets to tighten control: one of his first acts was to defund or shut down government-backed broadcasters like Voice of America3. Observers dubbed this effort “media capture,” noting it relied on “threats and intimidation” to bend the press to the administration’s will3. Even routine journalism was attacked: at a Justice Department speech Trump called investigative reporting “illegal” and bluntly ordered it to stop7. In short, Trump’s default was not to debate unfavourable facts but to bully media organizations into silence or compliance. Domestic Governance: Loyalty and Intimidation In the halls of government, Trump treated loyalty as paramount and viewed dissent as betrayal. He famously told aides before taking office that the single trait he prized was personal loyalty6, and his presidency proved it. Advisors who questioned him found themselves marginalized or fired. Early on, for example, Trump privately implored FBI Director James Comey to drop the investigation of an aide, asking him to “see [his] way clear to letting this go”6 — a thinly veiled demand for compliance with Trump’s personal interests. Those who did not “prove themselves” often faced public shaming or career consequences.
Even ostensibly neutral institutions were pressed into service. According to one analysis, Trump’s White House resembled a “mob boss hierarchy”: cabinet and agency positions were filled with figures who showed “unwavering loyalty” to Trump’s personal agenda2. Loyalty tests abounded — from public fealty on television to whispered pressure in private. Criticized Supreme Court justices and legislators who opposed Trump’s picks were often called “crazy” or branded as enemies in public. The Republican Party under Trump, as one commentator observed, “became particularly clannish,” with intimidation bringing senators into line to approve his most controversial nominees7. In addition to personnel loyalty, Trump aggressively used legal and executive power to intimidate other branches and bureaucracies. He barred enforcement of subpoenas, threatened election officials, and openly attacked judges. In 2025, for instance, he issued executive orders threatening the very existence of law firms representing his opponents: one order suspended security clearances for attorneys at a firm working on investigations against him, “directly threatening its existence”1. A federal judge struck down that order as “retaliatory in nature,” warning it sent “chills down my spine” for anyone challenging the president2. Likewise, when powerful universities protested his policies, Trump menaced them with budget cuts — New York’s Columbia University only “gave in” to expanded federal oversight after the threat of defunding3. On all these fronts, Trump’s answer to disagreement was to wield coercion: punish the speaker rather than address the issue.
Foreign Policy: Bully Diplomacy Trump’s “America First” agenda often translated into coercive foreign policy. He favoured transactional pressure over alliance-building. He openly threatened military action against North Korea — warning that Pyongyang would be met with “fire and fury … like the world has never seen” if it continued its threats9. In Europe, he brusquely demanded NATO members spend more on defence or face new tariffs; he even joked about annexing parts of Greenland or imposing duties on friendly countries as leverage4. One analysis notes Trump effectively “bullied America’s allies,” leveraging intimidation to try to renegotiate trade and security ties4. For example, he ordered allies to pay for increased U.S. troop deployments and threatened an “end to the trade surplus” as a condition for any deal4. In other cases, he simply withdrew from international commitments (the Paris climate deal, the Iran nuclear agreement, the World Health Organization) as a means of coercing or punishing nations that disagreed with him. By turning off the traditional levers of American multilateral influence, Trump sent the message: “fall in line or lose American support.” Across his foreign engagements, then, Trump consistently used implicit or explicit threats —economic sanctions, tariffs, military actions— to bend foreign leaders to his will, rather than seeking diplomatic compromises on shared interests.
🍊🤡 Trump’s “art of the deal” is coercion: threaten, sue, punish, then declare victory. From Roy Cohn’s playbook to the White House, he treats allies and institutions like targets. Democracy can’t run on extortion. 👎😒🤥💢🗑️ #Coercion #AbuseOfPower #Authoritarianism #BullyPolitics
Well if he don't have enough evidence 🙄 why is he resigning. #bullypolitics
Well if he don't have enough evidence 🙄 why is he resigning. #bullypolitics
#Iowa
#PaytoPlay goes hand in hand with #BullyPolitics
It's the #IowaGOP way
www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8MeywbH/
Surprise, people don't like to visit a fascist country for their vacation! And guess who gets the brown end of the stick? Workers. Not the Wealthy who are profiteering from the wreck. www.pressherald.com/2025/05/13/m...
#maine #trumpwreck #bullypolitics
@japantimes.co.jp Trump's economic vandalism and fiscal malfeasance unite the world against him as calls for unity in the face of Trump's bully politics resonate in Asia. Source: (The Japan Times.) #Tariffs #BullyPolitics #TrumpMalfeasance
www.japantimes.co.jp/commentary/2...
@reuters.com @euronews.com ews.com
Trump flops again! From Greenland grabs to EU tariffs—now the U.S. begs Europe for eggs. Trump & RFK Jr. botched bird flu—egg prices up 59%. Big talk, no results www.reuters.com/world/us/how... #Eggs #BullyPolitics.
Words of a future Nobel winner?
“I am sending Israel everything it needs to finish the job, not a single Hamas member will be safe if you don’t do as I say.” #uspol #bullypolitics
