Advertisement · 728 × 90
#
Hashtag
#CdnWRDS
Advertisement · 728 × 90

#genai+writing #writingstudies #cdnwrds

2 0 0 0
Preview
Speakers' Footing in a Collaborative Writing Task: A Resource for Addressing Disagreement While Avoiding Conflict It is widely assumed in studies of conflict that either persons address and resolve disagreement by waging conflict or that persons avoid conflict and thereby fail to address disagreements. Howev...

My thoughts on changes of footing as signs of possible disagreement are brought to you by my recent reading of this article. 8/

#writingstudies #teamrhetoric #cdnwrds #genai+writing

www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1...

2 1 1 0
As language and communication
instructors, we have an abundance of experience about what writing does and can do, both inside
and outside our classrooms. As researchers, we work from empirical insights on the situated
purposes, processes, and possibilities for writing and its practice. In direct and indirect ways,
agentive tools increasingly impact “how we write, what we write, and the networks and assemblages
in which we write” (Bedington et al., 2024, p. 1). Growing access to artificial intelligence (AI)
applications changes the affordances with which students and instructors plan projects, generate
ideas, and structure their documents. As these changes are underway, instructors encounter “much
under-informed punditry” making assertions about writing pedagogy, with neither formal study nor
experienced teaching to support or guide those assertions (Majdik & Graham, 2024, p. 224). A core
challenge we face as scholars and teachers of writing is not that there is too little extant research and
understanding about what writing is or does. Rather, the issue is that this research is not prominent
enough. So, what does our collective writing studies knowledge suggest in relation to this newly
animated topic of writing about, with, or against generative AI tools? This paper asks: which of our
core disciplinary insights are most relevant at this moment and how do they help us frame the
teaching of research and writing in relation to generative AI tools? Given both authors’ research and
teaching backgrounds, this analysis focuses on conceptual structures and empirical insights provided
by rhetorical genre theory and genre-based pedagogy.

As language and communication instructors, we have an abundance of experience about what writing does and can do, both inside and outside our classrooms. As researchers, we work from empirical insights on the situated purposes, processes, and possibilities for writing and its practice. In direct and indirect ways, agentive tools increasingly impact “how we write, what we write, and the networks and assemblages in which we write” (Bedington et al., 2024, p. 1). Growing access to artificial intelligence (AI) applications changes the affordances with which students and instructors plan projects, generate ideas, and structure their documents. As these changes are underway, instructors encounter “much under-informed punditry” making assertions about writing pedagogy, with neither formal study nor experienced teaching to support or guide those assertions (Majdik & Graham, 2024, p. 224). A core challenge we face as scholars and teachers of writing is not that there is too little extant research and understanding about what writing is or does. Rather, the issue is that this research is not prominent enough. So, what does our collective writing studies knowledge suggest in relation to this newly animated topic of writing about, with, or against generative AI tools? This paper asks: which of our core disciplinary insights are most relevant at this moment and how do they help us frame the teaching of research and writing in relation to generative AI tools? Given both authors’ research and teaching backgrounds, this analysis focuses on conceptual structures and empirical insights provided by rhetorical genre theory and genre-based pedagogy.

Here is how we put it in the introduction of our recent paper. 3/

philarchive.org/rec/THIGAA

#writingstudies #cdnwrds #teamrhetoric #genai+writing

3 0 0 0

So many editors‘ time and energy is being wasted.

#writingstudies #genai+writing #cdnwrds

10 1 1 0

"We suggest that the scientific community needs to think carefully about where we find worth in what we do. LLMs are eroding that space."

#writingstudies #cdnwrds #teamrhetoric #genai+writing

22 4 0 0

#writingstudies #cdnwrds #teamrhetoric

5 1 0 0

#writingstudies #genai+writing #cdnwrds #teamrhetoric

32 10 1 0

#writingstudies #cdnwrds #genai+writing #teamrhetoric

4 2 0 0

Going to use this in my research writing class next week. Where we have been doing genre move analysis, so students are very ready.

#writingstudies #teamrhetoric #cdnwrds

5 1 0 0

Update!

#genai+writing #writingstudies #cdnwrds

bsky.app/profile/joes...

3 0 0 0

Notes on the student essay from a classic, Womack, "What Are Essays For?," 1993:

The essay is "a culturally specific form of communication which has not always existed, and which depends for its existence now on some quite definite institutional contexts" /1

#writingstudies #teamrhetoric #cdnwrds

10 3 1 0

#genai+writing #writingstudies #cdnwrds #teamrhetoric

0 0 0 0

Current AI models work with snapshots of what was on the internet circa 2022. These sources in turn foreground older, already heavily cited sources. A feedback cycle that drives model collapse.

#citation #writingstudies #cdnwrds #teamrhetoric

3 0 2 0

Like, I can tell you that across Canadian universities the productivity expectations for writing studies instructors have increased—e.g., in the form of student numbers—and they are not reasonable.

#writingstudies #cdnpse #cdnwrds #teamrhetoric #rhetcomp

4 2 1 0

So I think it can be too corrosive to teach students to read and write that way. A misapplied hermeneutics of suspicion, perhaps, which should be better directed, used in more productive ways.

#writingstudies #genai+writing #cdnwrds #teamrhetoric

bsky.app/profile/natk...

10 1 1 0
Redirecting

Sandstead & Kibler, "Voice in L2 Writing in the Age of AI" build on Matsuda and think about how chatbot and human voice can be conceptualized in distinction from each other. With pedagogical implications added on.

#writingstudies #genai+writing #cdnwrds

linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii...

1 0 0 0

For those who missed it. Eric Kaufmann—widely known for propagating the concepts of "great replacement" and "great awokening" as well as for supporting various race science networks—recently spoke as a witness at this Canadian House of Commons committee.

#cdnpse #cdnwrds

bsky.app/profile/katj...

29 13 1 0
Preview
After the Fire: Reflections and Learning by Ripple Effect Nia Pazoki (she/her) is a Ph.D. candidate in Educational Psychology at Simon Fraser University and one of the Writing Services Coordinators at the Student Learning Commons (SLC). Her work focuses o…

Really lovely piece.
#writingstudies #cdnwrds #rhetcomp

cwcaaccr.com/2025/07/25/a...

0 0 0 0

Interesting story. About one hoax. And then another.

#writingstudies #disciplinarity #cdnwrds

3 2 0 0

„You can trick AI chatbots like ChatGPT or Gemini into teaching you how to make a bomb or hack an ATM if you make the question complicated, full of academic jargon, and cite sources that do not exist. That’s the conclusion of a new paper.“

#genai+writing #writingstudies #cdnwrds

23 6 2 1

PS: Part of my motivation for spending serious amounts of time figuring out how to teach in deep alignment with research in rhetorical genre theory, pragmatics, applied language was that I used to overhear senior teachers say that doing so is too intellectually challenging for students. 8/

#cdnwrds

0 0 1 0

I mention it because I see the paper getting downloaded quite frequently. But otherwise, we've not seen traction. Not sure why. So, if you have reason to read it and if it fits into your work, we'd be quite excited about seeing it cited. :)

#writingstudies #cdnwrds #transstudies #teamrhetoric

5 0 0 0
Preview
Teaching Scores, Storied Averages, and Small Classes University administrations are very keen on student evaluations. Behind the scenes, they are a managerial lever in employment decisions and…

If you've ever found yourself in a position of inventing some sort of story that might explain uneven student evaluation scores—your own or someone else's—then this blog post is for you.

#writingstudies #cdnwrds #rhetcomp #teamrhetoric

55 10 6 1

Spicy.

#citation #writingstudies #cdnwrds

0 0 0 0

#writingstudies #cdnwrds #rhetcomp #teamrhetoric #citation

0 0 0 0
Preview
Large models of what? Mistaking engineering achievements for human linguistic agency In this paper we argue that key, often sensational and misleading, claims regarding linguistic capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) are based …

From Birhane & McGann, "Large Models of What?" in *Language Sciences.* A linguistically driven discussion of why LLM outputs are not like human languaging at all.

#writingstudies #genai+writing #cdnwrds #rhetcomp #teamrhetoric

www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

2 0 0 0
Preview
How AI Made the Future Unthinkable Advanced artificial intelligence will change everything, we are told. Do we get a say?

Source: nymag.com/intelligence...

#writingstudies #genai+writing #cdnwrds #rhetcomp #teamrhetoric

0 0 0 0

Yes.

bsky.app/profile/futu...

#genai+writing #writingstudies #cdnpse #cdnwrds #teamrhetoric #rhetcomp

2 0 0 0

#writingstudies #cdnwrds #disciplinarity #genai+writing

1 0 0 0

#writingstudies #cdnwrds #journalism

1 0 0 0