✉️ Read the latest edition of our newsletter!
This month's edition highlights a few upcoming #IP-related events, outlines the latest updates in the world of IP #policy, spotlights the #inventor of the telephone, Alexander Graham Bell, fact checks assumptions underlying the #ETHICAct, and much more.
📜 Why do we oppose the #ETHICAct?
The bill would limit the number of related #patents that can be asserted in #infringement cases, even when those patents cover distinct, non-overlapping aspects of the same disclosure.
For more:
The #ETHICAct targets a problem that does not exist: so-called "patent thickets."
"This bill would impose an arbitrary, unnecessary burden on American #inventors when no significant problem of delayed generic entry exists."
Learn more from C4IP's recent statement on the #bill:
📰 #ICYMI: Law360 covered C4IP's statement on the #ETHICAct.
"'...as confirmed by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, the number of #patents is not correlated to the timing of generic entry. Rather, these patents are essential to adequately protect complex #inventions.'"
For more info:
📰 IPWatchdog highlighted #C4IP's statement on the #ETHICAct in a recent article:
"'Prohibiting the enforcement of validly issued U.S. #patents destabilizes the entire #innovation ecosystem,' said C4IP's Executive Director Frank Cullen."
Read the full article:
📣 Today, Frank Cullen, #C4IP executive director, issued the following statement urging Congress to reject the #ETHICAct in its entirety:
“Prohibiting the enforcement of validly issued U.S. #patents destabilizes the entire #innovation ecosystem..."
Read our full statement: