Advertisement · 728 × 90
#
Hashtag
#FerryRoad
Advertisement · 728 × 90
video by ‪@wingpig.bsky.social‬ in hours of darkness, showing severely narrowed path between temporary fence & metal lamp-post [measured by spokes as 77cm]

The precision with which the widest part of the obstruction had been aligned with a lamp-post is striking; it's almost like they want everyone to slip over on the grass.

video by ‪@wingpig.bsky.social‬ in hours of darkness, showing severely narrowed path between temporary fence & metal lamp-post [measured by spokes as 77cm] The precision with which the widest part of the obstruction had been aligned with a lamp-post is striking; it's almost like they want everyone to slip over on the grass.

New spokes email to council & councillors asking for public safety to be restored...

Subject: Ferry Road Path Obstructions - Leonardo Fence Construction

To: Roadoccupation <roadoccupation@edinburgh.gov.uk>
Cc: Spokes PG <spokes-lothian-planning@googlegroups.com>, Cammy Day <Cammy.Day@edinburgh.gov.uk>, Cllr.Stuart Dobbin <Cllr.Stuart.Dobbin@edinburgh.gov.uk>, Cllr.kayleigh.kinross O'neill <cllr.kayleigh.kinross-o'neill@edinburgh.gov.uk>, Cllr.Sanne.Dijkstra Downie <Cllr.Sanne.Dijkstra-Downie@edinburgh.gov.uk>

I'm writing to raise a safety issue with the fence construction works ongoing by Leonardo on the Ferry Road Path.

Spokes have received complaints that the path has been narrowed, noting that it is not safe to pass by bicycle or wheelchair. I've attached some photos and a diagram of the site.

Restrictions in width to just 77cm are present in 2 locations, whilst other locations require wheeling on muddy grass.

    Site welfare facilities have been placed occupying almost the full path width. A nearby lighting column means a pinch point is present, with site fencing seen to be damaged possibly from a collision.
    Site security towers remain in place, despite the path having been re-opened. These should be placed within the site boundary or removed, as their motion detection is redundant with the path now open.

The issues were discussed with the site manager, who took on board the need to maintain a 1500mm gap for cycles but was unable to commit to addressing these obstructions. They stated that the security towers are necessary for CCTV and couldn't be relocated. They raised concern with grass damage if site welfare facilities were relocated.

Please can you ensure the contractor occupying this path is providing suitable public safety during the works for people wheeling and cycling.

New spokes email to council & councillors asking for public safety to be restored... Subject: Ferry Road Path Obstructions - Leonardo Fence Construction To: Roadoccupation <roadoccupation@edinburgh.gov.uk> Cc: Spokes PG <spokes-lothian-planning@googlegroups.com>, Cammy Day <Cammy.Day@edinburgh.gov.uk>, Cllr.Stuart Dobbin <Cllr.Stuart.Dobbin@edinburgh.gov.uk>, Cllr.kayleigh.kinross O'neill <cllr.kayleigh.kinross-o'neill@edinburgh.gov.uk>, Cllr.Sanne.Dijkstra Downie <Cllr.Sanne.Dijkstra-Downie@edinburgh.gov.uk> I'm writing to raise a safety issue with the fence construction works ongoing by Leonardo on the Ferry Road Path. Spokes have received complaints that the path has been narrowed, noting that it is not safe to pass by bicycle or wheelchair. I've attached some photos and a diagram of the site. Restrictions in width to just 77cm are present in 2 locations, whilst other locations require wheeling on muddy grass. Site welfare facilities have been placed occupying almost the full path width. A nearby lighting column means a pinch point is present, with site fencing seen to be damaged possibly from a collision. Site security towers remain in place, despite the path having been re-opened. These should be placed within the site boundary or removed, as their motion detection is redundant with the path now open. The issues were discussed with the site manager, who took on board the need to maintain a 1500mm gap for cycles but was unable to commit to addressing these obstructions. They stated that the security towers are necessary for CCTV and couldn't be relocated. They raised concern with grass damage if site welfare facilities were relocated. Please can you ensure the contractor occupying this path is providing suitable public safety during the works for people wheeling and cycling.

photo of the constriction in daylight

photo of the constriction in daylight

photo of second constriction, at CCTV camera

photo of second constriction, at CCTV camera

🙄 #FerryRoad path

Saga continues, with dangerous new constriction

🙄 We've had to write again

@edi.bike @stephenjenkinson.bsky.social @wingpig.bsky.social @sannedd.bsky.social @helenrambler.bsky.social @maggieholland.bsky.social @thedreadedlurgy.bsky.social @crgn.bsky.social @duneslack.bsky.social

14 6 4 0
email from spokes to council & councillors


Hi Richard and councillors,


Spokes welcome the suspension of the Ferry Road Path closure. Thank you for actioning this.

We understand a decision is to be made on the arrangements for this work.

As public safety was cited as the reasoning previously, we are writing to comment on the works:


The fence is proposed to replicate and extend the existing 3m weldmesh fence installed along the path in 2010.

We note the existing fence was installed without closure to the Ferry Road Path, with the construction methodology noted on the 2010 planning drawing.

Although it may be cheaper to use a different methodology, we would suggest this should be replicated to minimise impact on users.


We understand the council owns the whole embankment and has granted Leonardo UK permission to install this fence on their land.

Note the embankment is currently without fencing or edge protection, as is common on Edinburgh's offroad paths.

During the works vegetation will require to be cut back and 1m deep holes dug at 2.4m centres roughly 0.5m away from the path.

It should be possible to conduct these works without a closure of the path and we encourage the council to press the contractor on substantiating their requirements.



Kind regards,

email from spokes to council & councillors Hi Richard and councillors, Spokes welcome the suspension of the Ferry Road Path closure. Thank you for actioning this. We understand a decision is to be made on the arrangements for this work. As public safety was cited as the reasoning previously, we are writing to comment on the works: The fence is proposed to replicate and extend the existing 3m weldmesh fence installed along the path in 2010. We note the existing fence was installed without closure to the Ferry Road Path, with the construction methodology noted on the 2010 planning drawing. Although it may be cheaper to use a different methodology, we would suggest this should be replicated to minimise impact on users. We understand the council owns the whole embankment and has granted Leonardo UK permission to install this fence on their land. Note the embankment is currently without fencing or edge protection, as is common on Edinburgh's offroad paths. During the works vegetation will require to be cut back and 1m deep holes dug at 2.4m centres roughly 0.5m away from the path. It should be possible to conduct these works without a closure of the path and we encourage the council to press the contractor on substantiating their requirements. Kind regards,

2010 instructions for installing the existing section of path, includes keeping the path open throughout.  See drawing in next attachment.

2010 instructions for installing the existing section of path, includes keeping the path open throughout. See drawing in next attachment.

part of 2010 works drawing, showing cycleway, fence & embankment.  See instructions in the previous attachment

part of 2010 works drawing, showing cycleway, fence & embankment. See instructions in the previous attachment

posts about QR8 ongoing path closure...

‪Jason Rose‬
 ‪@mrjasonrose.bsky.social‬
· 25d
I don't know who signed off the stopping up order for the cycle path between Edinburgh Park and Hermiston Gait but their idea of an 'alternative route' leaves a lot to be desired! 
@edinburghcouncil.bsky.social
 
@spokes.org.uk
 
@edi.bike
 #EdTravCyc
ALT
ALT
‪SpokesLothian‬
 ‪@spokes.org.uk‬
· 24d
Private land, path status unclear

🙄 Council signed it as part of Quiet Route 8, BUT doesn't seem to monitor QRs, so didn't know!!

🙋 We've urged them to investigate

🙋 Tell your cllrs!!

posts about QR8 ongoing path closure... ‪Jason Rose‬ ‪@mrjasonrose.bsky.social‬ · 25d I don't know who signed off the stopping up order for the cycle path between Edinburgh Park and Hermiston Gait but their idea of an 'alternative route' leaves a lot to be desired! @edinburghcouncil.bsky.social @spokes.org.uk @edi.bike #EdTravCyc ALT ALT ‪SpokesLothian‬ ‪@spokes.org.uk‬ · 24d Private land, path status unclear 🙄 Council signed it as part of Quiet Route 8, BUT doesn't seem to monitor QRs, so didn't know!! 🙋 We've urged them to investigate 🙋 Tell your cllrs!!

#FerryRoad path

👍 In 2010, council said path must stay open when fence built

🙄 In 2025, why did it need intervention by Spokes, cllrs & others?

🙄 Other closures also poor, e.g. QR8

@edi.bike @stephenjenkinson.bsky.social @helenrambler.bsky.social @sannedd.bsky.social @edcriticalmass.bsky.social

10 1 2 0
post from Prof Peter Matthews saying pathto be reopened for a rethink on the closure by Leonardo UK

post from Prof Peter Matthews saying pathto be reopened for a rethink on the closure by Leonardo UK

Spokes letter, part 1

I'm writing regarding the closure of the Ferry Road Path between Leonardo and Morrisons in TTRO TEMP/25/148 from today 21st November until 16th January 2026.

As I'm sure you know, this path forms an important Active Travel connection in the north of Edinburgh, being Quietroute11 and a protected Core Path.

It is estimated to have 300-500 daily cycle trips (NPT Scotland), along with many more pedestrian journeys. Usage typically peaks 8-9am and 3-5pm.

Being an offroad path, it is relied on by many users who are not comfortable or experienced cycling on a main road, including families and children.


Risk

The safety measures for these works appear surmountable and should not require a full closure.

The fence erection works are similar to works conducted by the council in the past, such as tree felling works. I've attached an example on the Coltbridge Viaduct from 2020.

The diversion across the Crewe Toll Roundabout is extremely busy with motor vehicles and surely presents a greater dangerous to cyclists otherwise using an offroad path.

Will this diversion be signed and made suitably safe? I note the requirements in the NRSWA Red Book to ensure diversions are risk assessed for all users.

Spokes letter, part 1 I'm writing regarding the closure of the Ferry Road Path between Leonardo and Morrisons in TTRO TEMP/25/148 from today 21st November until 16th January 2026. As I'm sure you know, this path forms an important Active Travel connection in the north of Edinburgh, being Quietroute11 and a protected Core Path. It is estimated to have 300-500 daily cycle trips (NPT Scotland), along with many more pedestrian journeys. Usage typically peaks 8-9am and 3-5pm. Being an offroad path, it is relied on by many users who are not comfortable or experienced cycling on a main road, including families and children. Risk The safety measures for these works appear surmountable and should not require a full closure. The fence erection works are similar to works conducted by the council in the past, such as tree felling works. I've attached an example on the Coltbridge Viaduct from 2020. The diversion across the Crewe Toll Roundabout is extremely busy with motor vehicles and surely presents a greater dangerous to cyclists otherwise using an offroad path. Will this diversion be signed and made suitably safe? I note the requirements in the NRSWA Red Book to ensure diversions are risk assessed for all users.

Spokes letter, part 2

Amenity

We are also concerned by the duration of this closure and the lack of notice.

It is dissapointing that the closure was only signed on Wednesday, less than 48 hours before coming into effect, for what are clearly long planned works.

TTROs are advised by the council to be submitted 30 working days in advance for adaquate process, and we would expect atleast a weeks notice.

Advance signage should be placed to warn users of the closure, such as the attached example from Holyrood Park. The closure can be included within the weekly Edi.bike cycling newsletter on Monday.

The 8 week duration of the closure appears very onerous. Works extends over the Christmas period when no work will likely be taking place.

Additionally, we would expect works on such a busy route to be limited to outside of peaks hours. For example, recent path closures on the Union Canal were limited to 9:30am-3:30pm, with a member of staff present to assist disabled access.

Will it be possible to reopen the path during peaks hours and the Christmas period?


Statute

I note the Department of Transport TSM Chapter 8, repeated in the councils own factsheet, state:

D3.32.17 Wherever possible, access should be maintained for cyclists in both directions throughout the period
of road works, avoiding more hazardous diversions. Where possible, a segregated cycle lane or route away from
the carriageway should be provided particularly on dual carriageways or multi-lane roads.


D3.32.18 When cycle routes, and other facilities for the exclusive use of cyclists and pedestrians, are affected
by the road works the changes should be clearly signed well in advance of the road works.


D3.32.19 Where there is cycle provision, such as cycle lanes or tracks, efforts should be made to keep these
open or to provide an acceptable alternative during the road works.

Spokes letter, part 2 Amenity We are also concerned by the duration of this closure and the lack of notice. It is dissapointing that the closure was only signed on Wednesday, less than 48 hours before coming into effect, for what are clearly long planned works. TTROs are advised by the council to be submitted 30 working days in advance for adaquate process, and we would expect atleast a weeks notice. Advance signage should be placed to warn users of the closure, such as the attached example from Holyrood Park. The closure can be included within the weekly Edi.bike cycling newsletter on Monday. The 8 week duration of the closure appears very onerous. Works extends over the Christmas period when no work will likely be taking place. Additionally, we would expect works on such a busy route to be limited to outside of peaks hours. For example, recent path closures on the Union Canal were limited to 9:30am-3:30pm, with a member of staff present to assist disabled access. Will it be possible to reopen the path during peaks hours and the Christmas period? Statute I note the Department of Transport TSM Chapter 8, repeated in the councils own factsheet, state: D3.32.17 Wherever possible, access should be maintained for cyclists in both directions throughout the period of road works, avoiding more hazardous diversions. Where possible, a segregated cycle lane or route away from the carriageway should be provided particularly on dual carriageways or multi-lane roads. D3.32.18 When cycle routes, and other facilities for the exclusive use of cyclists and pedestrians, are affected by the road works the changes should be clearly signed well in advance of the road works. D3.32.19 Where there is cycle provision, such as cycle lanes or tracks, efforts should be made to keep these open or to provide an acceptable alternative during the road works.

👍 #FerryRoad path: closure rethink

Our letter to council & cllrs attached..

#EdTravCyc @edi.bike @robbieainsworth.bsky.social @iammelissa.bsky.social @sarcainian.bsky.social @thedreadedlurgy.bsky.social @andrewburnie.bsky.social @crgn.bsky.social @stefsagrott.bsky.social @tracygriffen.bsky.social

14 3 3 0
Crewe Road South
The protected cycleways have proved highly popular especially for access to the Western General Hospital and need to be retained along with the carriageways reduction at the Orchard Brae roundabout.
1. There is a significant build out towards the northern end of the road for a pedestrian crossing. Due to the reduced lane width, there is a gap in the cycle protection and cyclists have to merge with traffic. Alternative solutions are required, such as a cycle by-pass around the back of the crossing, so that cyclist protection for southbound cyclists can be continuous. Clearly such an intervention was outside of the scope of the “temporary measures” but should be implemented now.
2. The surface in the cycle lanes is very poor, and should be improved.
3. At Comely Bank Roundabout, the geometry of the roundabout should be physically changed so that drivers cannot use the desire-line and go straight across the hatching from eg Craigleith Road to Comely Bank Road. Recent observation is that the lane narrowing markings on the roundabout are being abused and having limited effect at traffic calming. Cyclists are also in danger of being overtaken on the roundabout and then “left-hooked” when drivers get back into the lane. A more effective intervention is required.

Crewe Road South The protected cycleways have proved highly popular especially for access to the Western General Hospital and need to be retained along with the carriageways reduction at the Orchard Brae roundabout. 1. There is a significant build out towards the northern end of the road for a pedestrian crossing. Due to the reduced lane width, there is a gap in the cycle protection and cyclists have to merge with traffic. Alternative solutions are required, such as a cycle by-pass around the back of the crossing, so that cyclist protection for southbound cyclists can be continuous. Clearly such an intervention was outside of the scope of the “temporary measures” but should be implemented now. 2. The surface in the cycle lanes is very poor, and should be improved. 3. At Comely Bank Roundabout, the geometry of the roundabout should be physically changed so that drivers cannot use the desire-line and go straight across the hatching from eg Craigleith Road to Comely Bank Road. Recent observation is that the lane narrowing markings on the roundabout are being abused and having limited effect at traffic calming. Cyclists are also in danger of being overtaken on the roundabout and then “left-hooked” when drivers get back into the lane. A more effective intervention is required.

Ferry Road The protected cycle-ways on Ferry Road have been very welcome and they should be improved and made permanent.
1. Options for safe cycling, linking to other cycle routes, should be investigated at the junction with Inverleith Terrace and at the Ferry Road/Crewe Road South roundabout. This roundabout is a major deterrent to cycling in the area and came out with a high score in the Major Junctions Review. It poses a significant danger to cyclists.
2. Waiting by coaches should not be permitted, alternative waiting areas should be provided. Even if drop-off only is permitted, this brings the alternatives either of a large group of people exiting from the coach into the cycle lane, or, if the parking is
kerbside, forcing cyclists out into the main traffic lane outside of the coach. There are also many bus stops, causing similar problems for cycling. Consideration should be given to introducing floating bus-stops so that cyclists have continuous protection.
3. The cycleway surface is very poor and needs to be resurfaced in some places. Also, debris often builds up in the cycleway - more responsive cleaning should be provided.

Ferry Road The protected cycle-ways on Ferry Road have been very welcome and they should be improved and made permanent. 1. Options for safe cycling, linking to other cycle routes, should be investigated at the junction with Inverleith Terrace and at the Ferry Road/Crewe Road South roundabout. This roundabout is a major deterrent to cycling in the area and came out with a high score in the Major Junctions Review. It poses a significant danger to cyclists. 2. Waiting by coaches should not be permitted, alternative waiting areas should be provided. Even if drop-off only is permitted, this brings the alternatives either of a large group of people exiting from the coach into the cycle lane, or, if the parking is kerbside, forcing cyclists out into the main traffic lane outside of the coach. There are also many bus stops, causing similar problems for cycling. Consideration should be given to introducing floating bus-stops so that cyclists have continuous protection. 3. The cycleway surface is very poor and needs to be resurfaced in some places. Also, debris often builds up in the cycleway - more responsive cleaning should be provided.

West Shore Road and Marine Drive
Spokes welcomes the interventions on West Shore Road (WSR) and Marine Drive and would like to see further interventions and improvements. The new development on Marine Drive has provided an excellent off-road cycle path. West Shore Road is a very popular, mainly leisure, cycle route and needs further attention and a safe link to the existing off-road path on Lower Granton Road. More and more businesses are opening up on this road (WSR) and it is getting busier and busier and traffic at times includes large lorries and drivers often speed. One of our members wrote “I do cycle down West Shore Road, and I find it really challenging. I usually cycle with my kids on that road, and the cars, while there's not a lot, they pass fast and tight because of the road design. …. The pavement of the road itself is poor and I have had a flat tyre on this stretch of road - which was really stressful on my cargo bike! We had to lock it up and take a taxi home - there's no other option when my cargo bike goes down.” The footway surface is not a suitable alternative for children and is discontinuous. The original proposal had been for a protected cycleway, but this was not progressed. The closure at Gypsy Brae has helped to significantly reduce the traffic, especially from what it would have been given the extensive construction work on Marine Drive etc. 1. The segregated cycleway option should be re-investigated and will prove very popular with residents of the new developments, where some really excellent cycle infrastructure is being implemented. 2. In the short term, the council should proceed with the proposed introduction of a 20mph limit, supported by speed reduction infrastructure. Also, as mentioned in “Spokes response to the Spaces for People Consultation – West Shore Road 2 April 2021”, the barriers at the cycle feature that was introduced to enable access to the waterfront, need to be spaced further apart to make them more navigable by bike …

West Shore Road and Marine Drive Spokes welcomes the interventions on West Shore Road (WSR) and Marine Drive and would like to see further interventions and improvements. The new development on Marine Drive has provided an excellent off-road cycle path. West Shore Road is a very popular, mainly leisure, cycle route and needs further attention and a safe link to the existing off-road path on Lower Granton Road. More and more businesses are opening up on this road (WSR) and it is getting busier and busier and traffic at times includes large lorries and drivers often speed. One of our members wrote “I do cycle down West Shore Road, and I find it really challenging. I usually cycle with my kids on that road, and the cars, while there's not a lot, they pass fast and tight because of the road design. …. The pavement of the road itself is poor and I have had a flat tyre on this stretch of road - which was really stressful on my cargo bike! We had to lock it up and take a taxi home - there's no other option when my cargo bike goes down.” The footway surface is not a suitable alternative for children and is discontinuous. The original proposal had been for a protected cycleway, but this was not progressed. The closure at Gypsy Brae has helped to significantly reduce the traffic, especially from what it would have been given the extensive construction work on Marine Drive etc. 1. The segregated cycleway option should be re-investigated and will prove very popular with residents of the new developments, where some really excellent cycle infrastructure is being implemented. 2. In the short term, the council should proceed with the proposed introduction of a 20mph limit, supported by speed reduction infrastructure. Also, as mentioned in “Spokes response to the Spaces for People Consultation – West Shore Road 2 April 2021”, the barriers at the cycle feature that was introduced to enable access to the waterfront, need to be spaced further apart to make them more navigable by bike …

Bellevue to Canonmills & Broughton Street
The protected cycleways from Canonmills to Broughton Street have been very welcome and are being well used and should be improved and made permanent together with the footway extensions that have resulted in carriageway space reductions at junctions. Broughton St is a vital link and an important destination in its own right, and retaining the uphill protected cycleway is absolutely vital. for both purposes, particularly given that cyclists will be travelling relatively slowly compared to motor vehicles on this uphill stretch. Broughton Street is the least steep way of getting into the Centre from the North and is thus very attractive to cyclists.
We received the following from one of our members:
“I am writing in strong support of retaining the bike lanes along the Bellevue to Canonmills route. My wife and I recently purchased our flat on Rodney St. and its accessibility by bicycle was a central factor in our property purchase. I commute and travel every day by bicycle up this route, often several times per day, and would not feel safe doing so if I had to weave around parked cars, or did not have the safety of a divided lane. The route could still use improvement, but it is a huge step in the right direction. Beyond its personal value, I see how many, many people use the route, especially because it connects to the Goldenacre and Warrison paths. Even though cycle route 75 takes a different path, the steepness of the hill and the cobbles along Scotland St. make it very impractical (and almost impossible) to comfortably cycle. In effect, the Bellevue to Canonmills route is the true route connecting the northside active travel paths to the city centre, and hopefully soon to the exciting George St. and Meadows to George St. developments.”
Firstly, we will cover issues mainly concerned with the southbound (uphill) cycleway).
1. We are concerned that cycle defenders have been removed

Bellevue to Canonmills & Broughton Street The protected cycleways from Canonmills to Broughton Street have been very welcome and are being well used and should be improved and made permanent together with the footway extensions that have resulted in carriageway space reductions at junctions. Broughton St is a vital link and an important destination in its own right, and retaining the uphill protected cycleway is absolutely vital. for both purposes, particularly given that cyclists will be travelling relatively slowly compared to motor vehicles on this uphill stretch. Broughton Street is the least steep way of getting into the Centre from the North and is thus very attractive to cyclists. We received the following from one of our members: “I am writing in strong support of retaining the bike lanes along the Bellevue to Canonmills route. My wife and I recently purchased our flat on Rodney St. and its accessibility by bicycle was a central factor in our property purchase. I commute and travel every day by bicycle up this route, often several times per day, and would not feel safe doing so if I had to weave around parked cars, or did not have the safety of a divided lane. The route could still use improvement, but it is a huge step in the right direction. Beyond its personal value, I see how many, many people use the route, especially because it connects to the Goldenacre and Warrison paths. Even though cycle route 75 takes a different path, the steepness of the hill and the cobbles along Scotland St. make it very impractical (and almost impossible) to comfortably cycle. In effect, the Bellevue to Canonmills route is the true route connecting the northside active travel paths to the city centre, and hopefully soon to the exciting George St. and Meadows to George St. developments.” Firstly, we will cover issues mainly concerned with the southbound (uphill) cycleway). 1. We are concerned that cycle defenders have been removed

#BroughtonStreet
#Bellevue
#CreweRoad
#FerryRoad
#WestShoreRoad
#MarineRoad

👍 Thanks if *you* sent us your thoughts on our draft #ETRO submission

🚲 Final version--> www.spokes.org.uk/wp-content/u...

@edi.bike @chdot.bsky.social @julebandel.bsky.social @helenrambler.bsky.social @edfoc.bsky.social

3 3 0 0

#BroughtonStreet
#Bellevue
#CreweRoad
#FerryRoad
#WestShoreRoad
#MarineRoad

🙋‍♀️ If you 🚲 here, respond to the consultation by 15 Feb

@edi.bike @chdot.bsky.social @edinreporter.bsky.social @spurtle.bsky.social @julebandel.bsky.social @wolct.bsky.social @pollypur.bsky.social @sashataylor.bsky.social

1 5 1 0