Advertisement · 728 × 90
#
Hashtag
#LaneCountyPrivacy
Advertisement · 728 × 90
Preview
Residents urge Lane County to reject Flock surveillance camera contracts Multiple residents urged the Lane County Board of Commissioners to halt or reject contracts with Flock Technologies, citing data ownership, potential sharing with Palantir and federal agencies, and privacy and sanctuary-policy concerns.

Residents are rallying against Flock Technologies' surveillance cameras, arguing that the push for efficiency compromises their freedom and privacy—will Lane County heed the call?

Learn more here

#LaneCounty #OR #DataPrivacy #CommunityActivism #SurveillanceEthics #LaneCountyPrivacy

0 0 0 0
Preview
Resident urges Lane County to prohibit automated license plate readers, cites privacy and legal risks A resident told the board the Lane County Sheriffs Office should not deploy ALPR/Flock Safety cameras on rural roads, warning the technology poses Fourth Amendment and statutory privacy risks and has a history of interagency data sharing and breaches.

A Lane County resident is sounding the alarm on automated license plate readers, claiming they threaten privacy rights and could lead to misuse by law enforcement.

Get the details!

#LaneCounty #OR #LaneCountyPrivacy #DataPrivacy #CivilLiberties

0 0 0 0
Preview
Residents urge Lane County to halt Flock camera installations; commissioners ask sheriff for briefing Multiple public commenters urged Lane County to stop or pause a contract to install automated license‑plate readers (Flock cameras), citing privacy and immigration enforcement concerns; commissioners asked the sheriff to brief the board on contract status, data sharing and legal issues.

Residents are raising alarms over Flock's automated license-plate readers, claiming these cameras invade privacy and could be misused by federal agencies.

Get the details!

#LaneCounty #OR #LaneCountyPrivacy #DataPrivacy #CommunityEngagement #SurveillanceEthics

0 0 0 0