Advertisement · 728 × 90
#
Hashtag
#LitReviews
Advertisement · 728 × 90
Preview
Why write a literature review if AI can do it for you? - LSE Impact The potential for AI tool to assess and organise research literature presents an opportunity to rethink why they are undertaken in the first place.

🗣️"Rather, than lose the proverbial forest through the trees, researchers can ask more important questions, such as: why is a review needed, and where does it aim to take a field?"

#AcWri #LitReviews

3 1 0 0
Preview
Dismissive literature reviews reduce understanding – so why do academics keep making them? - LSE Impact Richard Phelps argues there is rarely a lack of pre-existing literature, but claiming so is a rhetorical move to give priority to one’s own research.

🗃️"With a dismissive review, a scholar assures an audience that little or no previous research exists on a topic or, if it does, it is so poorly done it is not worth citing."

#AcWri #LitReviews

6 2 0 0
Preview
Why write a literature review if AI can do it for you? - LSE Impact The potential for AI tool to assess and organise research literature presents an opportunity to rethink why they are undertaken in the first place.

👀ICYMI: Rather, than lose the proverbial forest through the trees, researchers can ask more important questions, such as: why is a review needed, and where does it aim to take a field?

✍️ Gorgi Krlev, @timothyrhannigan.bsky.social & @andrespicer.bsky.social #LitReviews #AcWri

7 2 0 0
Preview
Why write a literature review if AI can do it for you? - LSE Impact The potential for AI tool to assess and organise research literature presents an opportunity to rethink why they are undertaken in the first place.

💥New | Why write a literature review if AI can do it for you?

✍️ Gorgi Krlev, @timothyrhannigan.bsky.social & @andrespicer.bsky.social

#AcWri #SocialScience #LitReviews

8 7 0 1
A graphic that reads "The Benefits of Conducting Literature Reviews," with a photograph of stacked books on the left. Next to the books, 5 bullet points read:

1) Minimizing the need to start from scratch
2) Getting a better sense of what "success" looks like
3) Understanding what may constrain or support progress toward desired outcomes
4) Learning what has and hasn't worked in the past
5) Establishing strategies for measuring impact

A graphic that reads "The Benefits of Conducting Literature Reviews," with a photograph of stacked books on the left. Next to the books, 5 bullet points read: 1) Minimizing the need to start from scratch 2) Getting a better sense of what "success" looks like 3) Understanding what may constrain or support progress toward desired outcomes 4) Learning what has and hasn't worked in the past 5) Establishing strategies for measuring impact

For two examples of what makes these beneficial, see the lit reviews we recently conducted through projects w/ partners at Children’s National Hospital and @amlibraryassoc.bsky.social.

knology.org/article/hosp...

knology.org/article/coun...

#LitReviews #Libraries #InformalLearning #SocialScience

0 0 0 0
Post image

Preprint: "Assessing #Prompting Frameworks For Enhancing Literature Reviews Among University Students Using #ChatGPT" www.infodocket.com/2025/09/11/new-preprint-... #AI #LLMs #litreviews

2 0 0 0
Post image

Preprint: "Assessing #Prompting Frameworks For Enhancing Literature Reviews Among University Students Using #ChatGPT" www.infodocket.com/2025/09/11/n... #AI #LLMs #litreviews #libraries

2 0 0 0

Quick question for the political scientists out there:

What’s your favorite example of a piece of political science literature being terribly misconstrued in subsequent work?

I’m looking for some examples for my research design course. Thanks in advance! #PoliSky #Academia #litreviews

0 0 0 0
Table comparing eight AI tools on writing quality, citation quality, and prompt adherence. Elicit ranks highest with an overall score of 80, followed by Scite (74), and OpenAI (72). Each category uses purple blocks to indicate performance level, with medals for category leaders.

Table comparing eight AI tools on writing quality, citation quality, and prompt adherence. Elicit ranks highest with an overall score of 80, followed by Scite (74), and OpenAI (72). Each category uses purple blocks to indicate performance level, with medals for category leaders.

AI Tools for Literature Reviews Benchmarking Report www.nuancebehavior.com/report/ai-tools-for-lite... (worth a look) #AI #LitReviews

4 1 0 0
Post image

The recording is here! If you missed our webinar on unlocking the full potential of literature reviews in your pharmaceutical or health technology asset development, you can watch it here-> ow.ly/i9Cn50V63Lm #pharmaceutical #healthtechnology #litreviews

0 0 0 0
Preview
Webinar: Using Literature Reviews to Reveal the Benefits and Demonstrate the Value of Your Product​ Unlock the full potential of leveraging literature reviews in your pharmaceutical or health technology asset development strategy by joining our upcoming webinar. Gain valuable insights into various a...

Unlock the full potential of leveraging literature reviews in your pharmaceutical or health technology asset development strategy by joining our upcoming webinar. Learn more and register here. ow.ly/i9Cn50V63Lm #drugdevelopment #healthtech #litreviews

0 0 0 0
Post image

Research Paper (Preprint): “#LLMs for Literature Review: Are We There Yet?” www.infodocket.com/2024/12/23/r... #litreviews #ai #gpt

1 1 0 0