Advertisement · 728 × 90
#
Hashtag
#LiteStar
Advertisement · 728 × 90
Preview
GitHub - localizethedocs/litestar-docs-l10n: Localization of Litestar Documentation Localization of Litestar Documentation. Contribute to localizethedocs/litestar-docs-l10n development by creating an account on GitHub.

🎉 litestar-docs-l10n is published!

🚀 Preview:

projects.localizethedocs.org/litestar-doc...

🌐 Crowdin:

localizethedocs.crowdin.com/litestar-doc...

🐙 GitHub:

github.com/localizethed...

#Crowdin #GitHub #Sphinx #Python #Litestar #Web #ASGI

1 0 0 0
A bar chart comparing the performance of LiteStar (orange bars) and FastAPI (green bars) in Requests Per Second (RPS) as the number of dependencies ('Num Deps') increases from 0 to 5. The data shows that LiteStar consistently maintains a higher throughput than FastAPI across all dependency counts. For example, at 0 dependencies, LiteStar reaches 45573 RPS versus FastAPI's 37004 RPS. At 5 dependencies, LiteStar holds 32877 RPS while FastAPI drops to 26463 RPS.

A bar chart comparing the performance of LiteStar (orange bars) and FastAPI (green bars) in Requests Per Second (RPS) as the number of dependencies ('Num Deps') increases from 0 to 5. The data shows that LiteStar consistently maintains a higher throughput than FastAPI across all dependency counts. For example, at 0 dependencies, LiteStar reaches 45573 RPS versus FastAPI's 37004 RPS. At 5 dependencies, LiteStar holds 32877 RPS while FastAPI drops to 26463 RPS.

Testing #FastAPI vs #LiteStar with nested empty deps (0-5 levels).

Both show smooth perf degradation, unlike LiteStar's flat deps with TaskGroup.

Still, 5 deps = 28% drop for LiteStar — DI overhead is significant even when deps do nothing.

#Python

4 2 0 1
A bar chart comparing performance in Requests Per Second (RPS) between 'TaskGroup' (purple bars) and 'Await' (orange bars) based on the number of dependencies ('Num Deps'). For 1 dependency, TaskGroup achieves 4604 RPS and Await achieves 4628 RPS. For 2 dependencies, TaskGroup is at 4085 RPS while Await is at 4558 RPS. For 4 dependencies, TaskGroup drops to 3817 RPS, whereas Await maintains 4529 RPS, showing that Await scales better as dependency count increases.

A bar chart comparing performance in Requests Per Second (RPS) between 'TaskGroup' (purple bars) and 'Await' (orange bars) based on the number of dependencies ('Num Deps'). For 1 dependency, TaskGroup achieves 4604 RPS and Await achieves 4628 RPS. For 2 dependencies, TaskGroup is at 4085 RPS while Await is at 4558 RPS. For 4 dependencies, TaskGroup drops to 3817 RPS, whereas Await maintains 4529 RPS, showing that Await scales better as dependency count increases.

Quick perf test: changed #LiteStar dependency resolution from TaskGroup to await.

RPS impact? Minimal vs 17% degradation with TaskGroup at 4 deps. Each request does 4 DB calls.

TaskGroup overhead matters more than expected.

More details in thread 👇

#Python #Backend

4 2 2 1

In the previous thread, Litestar's RPS dropped 36% with 2+ flat dependencies due to TaskGroup overhead. 📉

How do #Litestar and #FastAPI perform with real DB queries in dependencies? Let's figure it out in this thread 🧵

#Python

9 1 1 2

Summarized my findings and opened an issue. Hoping to help make #LiteStar just a little bit better.
github.com/litestar-org...

#Python #Backend #WebDev

4 0 0 2
A bar chart titled "LiteStar" showing Request Per Second (RPS) performance across different numbers of dependencies (0 to 5). The RPS drops from 41,451 with 1 dependency to 26,492 with 2 dependencies. A red arrow points to this 36% decrease with a handwritten caption asking "Why?".

A bar chart titled "LiteStar" showing Request Per Second (RPS) performance across different numbers of dependencies (0 to 5). The RPS drops from 41,451 with 1 dependency to 26,492 with 2 dependencies. A red arrow points to this 36% decrease with a handwritten caption asking "Why?".

Is #LiteStar faster than #FastAPI? Benchmarks say yes, but look at Dependency Injection. 📉

Adding just 2 flat dependencies significantly degrades the throughput. I dug into the source to find why.

Thread: TaskGroups, Kahn's algorithm & performance trade-offs. 🧵

#Python #Backend #WebDev

6 2 3 3
Notes on FastAPI, LiteStar and HTMX I recently wrote about Picking a web framework for a project at work. We’re moving from an R Shiny app to something else. We weren’t sure what that something else should be so I rebuilt the app (in pa...

Notes on FastAPI, LiteStar and HTMX
recology.info/2025/10/fast... #python #htmx #litestar #fastapi

5 0 0 0

Глубокий обзор фреймворка Litestar от разработчика Django. Аж захотелось тоже попробовать!

https://www.b-list.org/weblog/2025/aug/06/litestar/

#try #python #webdev #litestar #programming

1 0 0 0

Litestar is worth a look #python #dev #api #litestar #fastapi

1 0 0 0

Litestar emerges as a strong FastAPI alternative. Users praise its robust design, speed, and built-in features like an event system. It's better suited for complex JSON/HTML serving, offering a more structured path for serious apps. #Litestar 3/6

0 0 1 0
Preview
Litestar is worth a look A few years ago at work, I had a project which offered an opportunity to look at the new generation …

New blog post: I've mentioned before that #litestar is by far my favorite of the new generation of #python web frameworks, and I've finally found time to write about why.

www.b-list.org/weblog/2025/...

3 2 0 0
Post image

LitestarCatsCV. Тренируемся на кошках. Расширяем возможност...

habr.com/ru/companies/ntechlab/ar...

#api #python #tutorial #backend #uv #fastapi #litestar #granian #jinja #keydb

Event Attributes

0 0 0 0
Post image

LitestarCatsCV. Тренируемся на кошках. Расширяем возможност...

habr.com/ru/companies/ntechlab/ar...

#api #python #tutorial #backend #uv #fastapi #litestar #granian #jinja #keydb

Event Attributes

0 0 0 0

Looked into #Litestar for #Python.
Nothing that explains the hype.
Nothing that appeals me over #FastAPI.
Perhaps one of these „yet another web frameworks“ that come and go.

1 0 0 0