Advertisement · 728 × 90
#
Hashtag
#MORRON
Advertisement · 728 × 90

#wtf is this piece of shit? So disgusting #morron

0 0 0 0
Three current Pentagon officials decried a new War Department policy designed to restrict press freedom. Under new rules, the Department of War said it would forbid reporters from gathering any information that had not been approved for release and would revoke press credentials from any journalists who did not obey. A 17-page document laying out the new guidelines says that journalists who wish to report from the Pentagon must sign agreements restricting their movement in the building and stipulating that they will not obtain or possess unauthorized material. “DoW remains committed to transparency to promote accountability and public trust,” the department’s Orwellian memorandum states. Experts and current Pentagon officials call the rules an egregious assault on the freedom of the press. ## Most Read Google Secretly Handed ICE Data About Pro-Palestine Student Activist Shawn Musgrave Democrats Slam Proposal to Give Marco Rubio the Power to Revoke Passports Matt Sledge The House Just Passed a Bill Punishing “Politically Motivated” Boycotts of Israel Matt Sledge One defense official who spoke to The Intercept on the condition of anonymity called the new policy a “mockery of American ideals.” Another likened it to policies seen in some of the most repressive and unstable nations on the planet. “The idea they want editorial control over the press is something I expect from a banana republic not the United States,” that official told The Intercept. A third said it was Secretary of War Pete Hegseth’s latest assault on accountability, referencing his earlier efforts to kneecap the military’s lawyers. “This is a direct assault on independent journalism at the very place where independent scrutiny matters most: the U.S. military,” National Press Club President Mike Balsamo said in a statement. “If the news about our military must first be approved by the government, then the public is no longer getting independent reporting. It is getting only what officials want them to see. That should alarm every American.” In a Friday post on X.com, Hegseth said that “the press is no longer allowed to roam the halls of a secure facility,” and that reporters would have to “wear a badge and follow the rules — or go home.” The Department of War responded to questions about the new policy from The Intercept with a boilerplate statement. “These are basic, common-sense guidelines to protect sensitive information as well as the protection of national security and the safety of all who work at the Pentagon,” said chief War Department spokesman Sean Parnell. “Agreeing not to look where the government doesn’t want you to look and, by extension, not to print what it doesn’t want you to print, is propaganda, not journalism,” Seth Stern, the director of advocacy at Freedom of the Press Foundation, told The Intercept. > “The government isn’t only seeking to restrain specific documents it contends pose a unique threat, it’s seeking to restrain everything it doesn’t want the public to know.” Stern noted that the government is legally barred from requiring journalists to trade their right to investigate the government in exchange for reporting access. “This policy operates as a prior restraint on publication which is considered the most serious of First Amendment violations. As we learned in the Pentagon Papers case, the government cannot prohibit journalists from public information merely by claiming it’s a secret or even a national security threat,” Stern said, referencing a landmark 1971 case in which the Supreme Court upheld the right of the New York Times and others to publish a classified Defense Department study of the Vietnam War. “This is worse in a way, because the government isn’t only seeking to restrain specific documents it contends pose a unique threat, it’s seeking to restrain everything it doesn’t want the public to know. That is fundamentally unAmerican.” Hegseth’s Pentagon pledged earlier this year to “always deliver on our promise of transparency.” In February, Hegseth booted several mainstream news organizations from their offices at the Pentagon, including CNN, NPR, the New York Times, and the Washington Post, in favor of conservative mouthpieces, like Breitbart, Newsmax, and One America News. ## Related ### Hegseth Leads Push to Punish Military Service Members Over Charlie Kirk Comments While not specifying any outlets by name, the defense official who said the new policy mocked American ideals expressed worry that some reporters would self-censor to curry favor with the War Department. “Some of these so-called journalists are a joke,” the official said. Balsamo noted that the latest media crackdown “comes at a time when the nation is witnessing a devastating hollowing out of defense trade publications, just as rigorous, independent coverage of military and national security issues has never been more essential.” Regular press briefings by the Pentagon press secretary or his deputy – a staple of previous years – have been abandoned in favor of propaganda pumped out by Hegseth, Parnell, and press secretary Kingsley Wilson. Wilson repeatedly replies to questions from The Intercept with variations on the phrase: “Nothing for you on that.” Early in his tenure, Hegseth shared classified information about forthcoming air strikes in Yemen in a private Signal group chat that included his wife. He also disclosed attack plans in a separate Signal chat that included the editor of The Atlantic. The Pentagon was also embarrassed by a leak to the New York Times that billionaire Elon Musk would receive a briefing on the military’s war plans concerning China. That briefing was called off and led to an investigation. The new press policy coincides with the Department of War’s political correctness crusade in the wake of the killing of conservative influencer Charlie Kirk. The military is taking disciplinary action against both enlisted troops and officers over social media posts they view as taking the wrong stance on Kirk’s legacy. ## We’re independent of corporate interests — and powered by members. Join us. Become a member ## Join Our Newsletter Thank You For Joining! Original reporting. Fearless journalism. Delivered to you. Will you take the next step to support our independent journalism by becoming a member of The Intercept? I'm in Become a member By signing up, I agree to receive emails from The Intercept and to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. ## Join Our Newsletter ## Original reporting. Fearless journalism. Delivered to you. I'm in The Pentagon’s actions are part of an all-out war on freedom of speech by the Trump administration. President Donald Trump recently filed a $15 billion defamation suit against the New York Times — which a federal judge threw out Friday, calling the complaint “improper and impermissible” in its current form. Trump also sued the Wall Street Journal in July for an article chronicling his relationship with the disgraced financier and sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. Trump previously sued CBS News and ABC News over their coverage of him, extracting $16 million settlements from each. This week, ABC apparently bowed to threats from chairman of the Federal Communications Commission Brendan Carr over remarks that Jimmy Kimmel, the host of ABC’s “Jimmy Kimmel Live,” had made in the wake of Kirk’s killing. The network pulled Kimmel’s late-night show from the air “indefinitely.” Stern said that the Trump administration, like its predecessors, often leans on vague national security claims to avoid having lies exposed _._ “Perhaps there are so many embarrassing documents at this point that it’s too difficult to keep finding bogus reasons to keep each of them secret,” Stern said. “Maybe that’s why the administration is taking more of a wholesale approach to concealing records that may show wrongdoing, corruption and incompetence.” Share * Copy link * Share on Facebook * Share on Bluesky * Share on X * Share on LinkedIn * Share on WhatsApp _IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT._ What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government. This is not hyperbole. Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation. Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.” The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy. ## We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us? $15 $25 $50 $100 $5 $8 $10 $15 One Time Monthly Donate ## Contact the author: Nick Turse nick.turse@theintercept.com @nickturse on X ## Related ### Hegseth Leads Push to Punish Military Service Members Over Charlie Kirk Comments ### Department of War Doesn’t Defend its Web Streams From Hackers ### Pentagon Official: Trump Boat Strike Was a Criminal Attack on Civilians ### The Pentagon Won’t Track Troops Deployed on U.S. Soil. So We Will. ### Pete Hegseth Is Mad the Media Won’t Celebrate U.S. War With Iran ### Pentagon Insiders on Hegseth Leak Hypocrisy: “Full On Shit Show” ## Latest Stories Voices ### Israel Gives Evacuation Orders Before a Bombing. Many Gazan Families Can’t Afford to Leave. Taqwa Ahmed Al-Wawi - Sep. 20 Forced displacement inflicts a staggering emotional toll on families in Gaza. It also brings steep economic costs. Voices ### Why FCC Chief Brendan Carr May Be the Most Dangerous Man in Media Jonathan Reiss - Sep. 19 Carr’s most pronounced quality is his total fealty to Donald Trump — and he’s been busy weaponizing the FCC for the cause. Israel’s War on Gaza ### Why Is New York City Leasing Space to Israeli Military Suppliers? Sanya Mansoor - Sep. 19 Companies making drones and camouflage allegedly used by the Israeli military operate in the Brooklyn Navy Yard. Activists want them out. Join The Conversation

Haha, he is afraid that they gonna write about his #alcoholism again, fucking #morron #totalitarian #shit #hegseth theintercept.com/2025/09/21/department-of...

0 0 0 0
Preview
An NYPD cruiser and a yellow cab collide on Broadway and 58th Street in Manhattan on September 13, 2020. Photo: Gabriele Holtermann/Sipa USA/AP Ian F. Blair is a writer and editor in New York City. On a street in Harlem, a New York Police Department officer sees a line of cars in front of him and can’t help himself. First, he sits idle, acting as if nothing is happening — because nothing, in fact, is happening. The stoplight in front of him is red, cars are patiently waiting, an e-bicycle whizzes by. A pedestrian looks both ways and crosses unremarkably. That’s when something strange occurs. The officer inches his Ford Police Interceptor Utility — bearing the words “COURTESY”, “PROFESSIONALISM” and “RESPECT” on the rear door — forward. He turns on his lights and dials up his choice of electronic siren. A quick whoop. A prolonged “bluuuuurrrppppprp.” A startling, pulsating, laser gun-sputtering sound. The cop car edges out over the crosswalk, then accelerates. As soon as he does, the sirens abruptly cease, like a fire alarm after a drill. The lights cut off. And the car is on to the next intersection. Inevitably, the police cruiser coasts through that red light too, nearly running over an auntie dressed in her Sunday best, who stops just in time not to become an afterthought. Where the NYPD is headed in that moment is not immediately clear; it seldom is. Just ask your average New York City resident. What is obvious, however, is that, whatever his destination, the officer didn’t want to wait. The worst-kept secret in New York is also one of its most bizarre and frequent happenings: The NYPD runs red lights in obviously non-emergency situations all the time. The scene I just described was just an average Sunday uptown around brunch o’clock. But it might as well have been in Bed–Stuy during school pick-up or in Parkchester on a Saturday morning. I’ve seen cops run lights so many times I’ve lost count. And the more I talk to people, the more I’ve discovered how prevalent the practice is. Stories abound. A parent at a party recounted a cop pulling out into an intersection against the light and nearly hitting a kid who had the right of way. Another person told me that officers at a red light near a church blurped the car in front of them, waiting patiently at a red. When the driver didn’t respond, one of the officers hopped on his intercom: “Just go through,” he instructed, assuring them that it was OK. The driver obliged, perhaps thinking it was an emergency. The cop car drove through. As soon as he was on his way, the car lights and sirens turned off. I asked Gersh Kuntzman, editor of Streetsblog NYC and a vigilante corrector of illegal license plates and parking placards on the streets of New York, when he first saw a cop run a red. “It’s like saying, do you remember the first time you had a slice of pizza,” Kuntzman said. “It happens every day.” Kuntzman, a street safety advocate who has for years documented the NYPD’s lawless driving behavior, told me nothing surprises him anymore. He has chronicled police parking habits — inspiring academic studies on the subject — and showed how cops go to extremes to avoid tickets and evade tolls on their personal vehicles. “When [cops] drive recklessly and they park recklessly, it’s not just a kind of disrespect for their neighbors — the ones they have sworn to serve or protect — but it is an example of how they see the use of the car. They see it as completely normal,” he told me, adding, “They’re almost never held accountable for misdeeds behind the wheel.” The New York Police Department did not respond to multiple requests for interviews and comment. ## Most Read ICE Agent Caught on Camera Disguised as a Construction Worker Nick Turse How Investigators Tracked Down the D.C. Plane Crash Video Leaker Nikita Mazurov, Shawn Musgrave New U.S. Report on Israel’s Human Rights Abuses Is 91 Percent Shorter Nick Turse One effect of watching a cop run a light is that something in you changes. Though what, exactly, is a bit difficult to pin down. It’s hard to maintain the sense of shock because it transpires so quickly and so unexpectedly. The city’s energy skips a beat, and when the flow of legal traffic resumes, you go about your day, with an expanded capacity to normalize what was previously unthinkable. That doesn’t stop you from trying to rationalize what you’ve seen. When it initially happens, you think: Maybe there was a reason? Perhaps there is an emergency? After all, a police cruiser is, as defined in Section 1104, Chapter 71, Title 7, Article 23 of New York’s Vehicle & Traffic Code, an “authorized emergency vehicle.” In an emergency, an authorized driver may “proceed past a steady red signal, a flashing red signal or a stop sign” and “disregard regulations governing directions of movement or turning in specified directions.” Notably, they can do so only “when involved in an emergency operation.” An “emergency operation” is its own well-known form of public peril. Police pursuits, according to a 2024 analysis of public traffic data by The City, can be quite deadly. Last year, NYPD vehicular chases resulted in nearly 400 vehicle crashes and at least 315 people injured. (The data didn’t even cover a full 12-month span.) Those numbers, which The City crunched using data from NYPD accident reports, have been rising rapidly under Mayor Eric Adams. But at least blowing through a light during a high-speed chase, though dangerous, is fairly straightforward. More difficult to explain is the need to disregard a signal during an “operation” that is so recognizably _un-justified._ It’s easy to tell when the police are actually engaged in an “emergency operation,” because they act noticeably different. They drive with purpose, blowing through light after light on their way to the site of an alleged emergency. But when it’s not an emergency, they run a light more nonchalantly. There’s no urgency, no follow-through, no commitment. The lights don’t stay on. The sirens go quiet. You know they aren’t on their way somewhere because they often end up back in the flow of traffic a few blocks away. Red-light running is a rare instance when the NYPD doesn’t hide its motives: There are no tactics of deception or smoke and mirrors. No detours around the corner. No exhibitions of speed. The NYPD can’t be bothered with filling plot holes to shore up the narrative. They have nowhere to be in a hurry, just not where they were. In that respect, the act of running a red light is, paradoxically, an example of NYPD transparency — an act of transparency without any of the traditional metrics. ## Related ### There Are So Many Armed Cops on Subways That Now They’re Shooting Each Other There are no comprehensive statistics about how often cops run lights in non-emergencies, or which officers engage in this practice the most frequently. Red-light violations are public and searchable by license plate, as Kuntzman has shown, but a problem arises when you try to determine the story behind a plate captured by a traffic signal camera: If a cop running a red is legal “when involved in an emergency operation,” how would you determine what instances to include? How would you know how many red-light runs are part of the same “emergency operation”? In addition to the limitations of the data — a traffic camera can only see what the camera is pointed at — you would need a reliable narrator. The police have proven themselves to be anything but, even if the media has a tendency to take them at their word. Will one of New York’s Finest dare to compile an accurate oral history of why their coworkers blow through reds on a daily basis? Without it, we may never know the whole story — the practice must have begun after 1920, when the first traffic towers were installed on New York’s streets, but even then, the lights were manually controlled by a fellow officer, who likely switched the signal to let their brothers’ Model A power through. We do have our own ad hoc surveillance, though. I’ll never forget the first time I saw a cop run a red light for no apparent reason. It was in front of a large crowd of pedestrians, in midtown, not far from where Luigi Mangione allegedly killed the UnitedHealthcare CEO. I was waiting for one of the homies, people-watching, when I noticed a cop car stopped at a light one block north of the corner on which I stood. Some tourists slowly crossed the street. Then I noticed the cop car turn on its lights and slowly slide through the light. To my right stood a pair of uniformed NYPD officers, and two more sentries posted up across the avenue. The car turned its siren on as it passed them, and then cut it off. It decelerated, then hit the siren again to extrajudicially make it through the next intersection only to get stuck in traffic when it neared Times Square. I couldn’t believe what I had just seen. ## We’re independent of corporate interests — and powered by members. Join us. Become a member ## Join Our Newsletter Thank You For Joining! Original reporting. Fearless journalism. Delivered to you. Will you take the next step to support our independent journalism by becoming a member of The Intercept? I'm in Become a member By signing up, I agree to receive emails from The Intercept and to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. ## Join Our Newsletter ## Original reporting. Fearless journalism. Delivered to you. I'm in I have lived in other major American cities, but I have never encountered police as pressed to get a few blocks ahead as they are in New York. After awhile, seeing a cop run a red becomes as visually unremarkable as seeing one scrolling on their phone. It is the kind of thing you might not notice unless you were looking for it. It also belies the “Do as I say, not as I do” approach to safety the NYPD is notorious for. ## Related ### Why Is Bill De Blasio Trying to Kill Me? New York’s Mayor Claims to Be Progressive but Favors Drivers Over Bicyclists. In April, NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch announced that police would begin issuing criminal summonses, in lieu of traffic tickets, to cyclists and e-bike riders caught running red lights. In June, the NYPD said it would expand its “quality of life” division to every precinct in the name of safety — “broken windows” by another name. Meanwhile, the NYPD and the mayor have been accused of corruption by several former high-ranking NYPD officers and by a former commissioner, who called their ring a “criminal enterprise.” Allegations notwithstanding, the act of running a red — in non-emergencies and during bona fide emergency operations — is a demonstration of the freedom to move. > They desire to be able to drive as they please, to be who they want to be behind the wheel, without being accountable for their actions. I like to think that any officer who partakes is responding to a limitation that they feel is imposed upon them by the law. They desire to be able to drive as they please, to be who they want to be behind the wheel, without being accountable for their actions. They are rejecting the fact that a framework should govern their movements. The act of running the red light, in defiance of a law they view as a burden, is a way for them to push against a preordained way of being and toward a future, which they alone desire to author. The line on the ground is literal, but it’s also metaphorical; it might as well be a Mad Libs for them to fill in as they see fit. “The driver of an authorized emergency vehicle, when involved in an emergency operation, may exercise the privileges set forth in this section,” § 1104 begins. In hitting his lights and siren, the officer behind the wheel responds to the prompt. If only he would have noted the “conditions herein stated” downpage: “The foregoing provisions shall not relieve the driver of an authorized emergency vehicle from the duty to drive with due regard for the safety of all persons, nor shall such provisions protect the driver from the consequences of his reckless disregard for the safety of others.” Share * Copy link * Share on Facebook * Share on Bluesky * Share on X * Share on LinkedIn * Share on WhatsApp _IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT._ What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government. This is not hyperbole. Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation. Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.” The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy. ## We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us? $15 $25 $50 $100 $5 $8 $10 $15 One Time Monthly Donate ## Contact the author: Ian F. Blair ## Related ### ICE Agent Fled From Angry Residents Outside New York School — and Got in a Car Crash ### How to Not Get Arrested After Killing Someone in Public ### Human Rights Watch Details NYPD Attack on Peaceful Protesters ### NYPD’s Culture of Impunity Sees an Officer Repeatedly Accused of Physical and Sexual Abuse Rising Through the Ranks ## Latest Stories Murder at the Motel ### Court Filings Reveal New Details About Oklahoma AG Flip-Flopping on Freeing Richard Glossip Liliana Segura, Jordan Smith - Aug. 15 AG Gentner Drummond, who is running for governor, told Glossip’s lawyer that the timing of his release hinged “on his own political calculus.” ### Trump the Landlord Plans to Speed Up Evictions From Public Housing Jessica Washington - Aug. 15 The Trump administration is pushing a rule change that would speed up the eviction process by providing tenants less notice. ### Can Congress Stop Trump From Starting a War in Mexico? Nick Turse - Aug. 15 More than 30 human rights groups urge congressional leaders to block Trump’s attempt to target Mexican cartels. Join The Conversation

theintercept.com/2025/08/16/nypd-car-red-... That’s because there is no oversight, #trump created #totalitarianstate #policestate so they do what they fucking want. This is the result of stupid voters who elected that #morron

0 0 0 0

@vonderleyen.ec.europa.eu
I'm not!
But if would be a leader in an 🇪🇺 country, I would add such #MORRON as #EXXON chief on a PERSONA NON GRATA file, without any doubt...
HE is threat, not only for N America or EU, but a worldwide one!!
SHAME 😞

0 0 0 0
Post image

I AM NOT FAT, YOU maw-rron

#furry #furryart #art #portal #portal2 #morron

7 2 1 0

« Nous enfonçons un poignard dans le cœur de la religion du changement climatique et inaugurons l’âge d’or de l’Amérique », a déclaré Lee Zeldin, administrateur de l’EPA, dans un texte paru dans le Wall Street Journal. »

#suchadick #morron #cromagnon

0 0 0 0
Post image

What a f****** #morron #fcktrmp

0 0 0 0

Meaning of #morron Pepper: hit surprising, unexpected. THUMP... morron

0 0 0 0

Significado de #morron morrón: golpe sorpresivo, inesperado. porrazo... morron

0 0 0 0

Significado de #morron Pimenta: golpe surpreendente, inesperado. TUM... morron

0 0 0 0