2 weeks ago
But Biden stuff was massive during election run up...so why has this been so quiet (especially internationally)?
The short answer: it’s a mix of timing, partisan self-interest on *both* sides, media overload, and the story becoming “inside-baseball legal drama” right when bigger Trump-era stories took over. The Hunter Biden/Burisma claims were huge in the 2023–early 2024 Republican echo chamber (Fox ran dozens of segments, House Oversight made it impeachment Exhibit A). But the moment the house of cards collapsed — Smirnov indicted Feb 2024 with proof he’d fabricated everything after Russian intel contacts — coverage fractured and faded fast. Here’s why the full arc (fabrication admission + Russian ties + Trump DOJ now quietly trying to unwind his sentence) has stayed so muted, especially abroad. 1. The timeline killed momentum Peak hype: 2023–Feb 2024 (pre-indictment). Collapse: Feb 2024 indictment + Russian intel revelations → right-wing media mostly went silent or defensive (Fox gave it minimal airtime, no retractions on old segments). Plea & sentencing: Dec 2024 / Jan 2025 — after the election was already decided. Old news by then. 2025 release attempt: Trump DOJ joined Smirnov’s lawyers; judge rejected it in April 2025 → covered by NYT/Reuters/AP but treated as procedural. March 2026 filing (the “reward” part you asked about): Quiet DOJ brief by Deputy AG Todd Blanche on March 4. Mother Jones broke it March 14 and explicitly noted it “has drawn no media attention.” That’s literally only ~5 days ago as of today. Technical appeals don’t go viral. 2. Partisan media incentives created a mutual blackout Conservative outlets (Fox, Breitbart, etc.): They sold the story hard. Covering the guilty plea, Russian involvement, and Trump DOJ helping the guy now would force a reckoning they’d rather skip. Early coverage of the plea was brief and neutral (“bogus Biden bribe story”); the new 2026 twist hasn’t been touched. Mainstream/left outlets: They reported the plea and sentencing as vindication, but once Biden lost and left office, the incentive to keep hammering an old, debunked GOP effort dropped. Plus Hunter Biden fatigue was real — the public had heard it for years. Net result: No one has a strong reason to push it front-page right now. 3. It’s now dry legal inside-baseball This isn’t a new indictment, a pardon, or fresh evidence — it’s a technical argument about whether the judge followed the exact wording of the plea deal on “time served” credit. Smirnov is still in prison (appeal pending). That doesn’t make cable-news chyrons or international headlines. 4. Why especially quiet internationally? Foreign outlets (BBC, Guardian, Reuters, etc.) covered the original 2024 charges and 2024 plea as a quirky US politics sidebar tied to the impeachment push. But: No ongoing foreign-policy hook (Biden’s out; Ukraine aid debates are about current Trump policy, not 2020 disinformation). The March 2026 filing hasn’t appeared in BBC/Reuters/Guardian at all — it’s too niche and US-centric. Global audiences aren’t glued to obscure 9th Circuit appeal technicalities. Bottom line: The “massive” phase was the promotion of the lie during the run-up. Once it was proven Russian-fed disinformation and the election ended, both sides quietly moved on for different reasons. The current Trump DOJ twist is so fresh and procedural that it hasn’t pierced the noise yet — exactly as Mother Jones observed when they published it. If it escalates (full pardon, dropped charges), it’ll explode again. Until then, it’s staying under the radar.
First I've heard of #Smirnov [He worked with #Russia and #Republicans to build a web of #lies that could #incriminate #President #Joe #Biden. Now he’s being rewarded....
#Trump #GOP #FoxNews #Breitbart #DOJ #USA #Federal #Pardon #FBI #IRS #Putin x.com/i/grok/share...
0
0
0
0