Autistamatic: "How Do You Know You're Definitely Autistic" | #TeatimeWithQuinn #Disability #SelfID #SelfIdentification #SelfDiagnosis #Veracity
www.patreon.com/posts/someth...
0
0
0
0
Hashtag
#SelfID
Advertisement · 728 × 90
I have no issue with anyone deciding to #SelfID as #transgender, Anne Frank or Count Binface.
0
0
0
0
#PamGosal quoting #GC Women's Rights Network ( #WRN) report on alleged assaults on kids in hospitals. Picked up by #MSP #KatyClark during the last #FMQs before Purdah.
" #WRN campaigns to retain hard-won rights of women, to prevent introduction of self-identification #SelfID in Gender Recognition"
0
0
0
0
Scottish Parliament Votes for Gender Reform Act (Scotland) Bill 2022 by democratic parliamentary majority. Those FOR Scottish Labour 21 for 0 against 0 abstained 1 did not vote + Hide details For Anas Sarwar Carol Mochan Claire Baker Colin Smyth Daniel Johnson Foysol Choudhury Jackie Baillie Katy Clark Mark Griffin Martin Whitfield Mercedes Villalba Michael Marra Monica Lennon Neil Bibby Pam Duncan-Glancy Paul O'Kane Paul Sweeney. Pauline McNeill Rhoda Grant Richard Leonard Sarah Boyack Against 0 Abstained 0 Did not vote Alex Rowley
By a parliamentary majority after the longest consultation in Scottish public history and vigorous cross chamber heated debate over 300 [many duplicated] amendments democratically dealt with voted FOR #Trans people #SelfDetermination [ #SelfID] subsequent fight about blocking #RoyalAssent abandoned
1
0
1
0
Those who voted in Scottish Parliament who absolutely supported the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill December 2022 Scottish Labour 21 for 0 against 0 abstained 1 did not vote + Hide details For Anas Sarwar Carol Mochan Claire Baker Colin Smyth Daniel Johnson Foysol Choudhury Jackie Baillie Katy Clark Mark Griffin Martin Whitfield Mercedes Villalba Michael Marra Monica Lennon Neil Bibby Pam Duncan-Glancy Paul O'Kane Paul Sweeney. Pauline McNeill Rhoda Grant Richard Leonard Sarah Boyack Against 0 Abstained 0 Did not vote Alex Rowley [He was away at time & couldn't vote]
#NicolaSturgeon was not divisive on #GenderRecognition [ #SelfID ]. #Scotland voted for the #GenderRecognitionActReformScotlandBill United across the chamber by solid majority.
6
2
0
0
This is the second time that Scotland has, in effect self hobbled.
Section 35 a #ScotlandAct clause #Salmond signed country to be bound by & used to kill our 2022 #SelfID Bill.
Now; "Incompetence" of #HolyroodLawyers drafting in clauses enabling a sincerely drafted Bill to procedurally collapse.
5
0
0
0
Across constitutional systems, legislatures & courts affirmed gender identity as integral to dignity, equality, & personal liberty, have adopted legal recognition models grounded in #SelfID, alongside long-standing legal safeguards addressing discrimination, violence, & inequality affecting women.
11
0
1
0
It is about finding the least risk to women and transwomen. Genitalia based safe spaces are a lot better than spaces based on #SelfID.
0
0
1
0
Joined the SNP & all through the Independence campaign I felt a part of something important. Vast majority of my branch being honourable & jolly decent people. I blurred the distinction between that & a range of #LGBTiQ+ charities committees I sat on. Trans #SelfID campaign burst my delusion. 1/2
1
0
1
0
Hope #ScottishParliament gets wind of a relative; expressed shift 'back' to where we started in 2018 where the general public, when consulted: very clearly supported #SelfID 64% - back then it wasn't the hot potato that #SexMatters try so hard to convince it is. 90% of 38,000 said ENOUGH of hate!
1
0
0
0
2/2 I'd definitely would have wanted to see her face for that last 12 mins.
In which she plays fast and very loose on the original #GRAReform consultations across Scotland and England/Wales also (as Glinner); suggesting Ireland was somehow fooled to slip #SelfID in. Again, vital context erased.
2
0
1
0
Saving redoing alt text.
You may find #Falkner #HolyroodNews quote from Feb 2022 interesting.
At the end of that year #Scotland had passed its #SelfID Bill and in January 2023 #Westminster stopped it's passage for #RoyalAssent Falkner probably had a hand in that too.
bsky.app/profile/neve...
2
1
0
0
His use of "Trannnns People" is always odious.
Go #Mexico with no political axe to grind nor grubby we sinecure to grasp onto.
youtu.be/XwMVMJtXV5o?...
#Trans people know who they are.
We all enjoy #SelfID every day.
So it is, that trans people ought, by now; to have explicit right to do too!
1
0
1
0
張茵惠：
如果社會不願正視性別分類的必要性，那麼女性的權益將僅在「最極端情境」下才被正當化，而這樣的局面是否真正符合公平正義？而我們也終將必須回應那個迄今無人能夠回答的問題：
「在追求平等的過程中，我們是否策略性抹除了女性受壓迫依然存在的事實？」
2025-05-11 www.savoirtw.org/article/4835
#人類觀察日記 #新噁男 #免術換證 #selfid
0
0
0
0
張茵惠：
幾乎沒有一個先進國家，會堅持讓未術生理男性進入女性庇護空間，反過來不就等於：唯有當女性遇到非常脆弱的絕境時，她們才有權利主張不跟跨性別者被分類在一起？
女性庇護所與危機支援機制之所以維持生理性別區分，是因為它們的存在目的是提供安全空間，特別是針對家庭暴力、性暴力的倖存者。然而，如果這樣的原則僅適用於最極端的狀況，而在一般公共空間，如廁所、更衣室，卻不被允許，那麼性別分類的合理性將會變得不一致，也可能嚴重影響女性的安全感。
2025-05-11 www.savoirtw.org/article/4835
#人類觀察日記 #新噁男 #免術換證 #selfid
0
0
1
0
張茵惠：
這經常表現在不成比例由生理男性發起的「司法繞道」之上，以台灣為例，當具備美國國籍的跨性別者，拒絕性別重置手術，卻試圖憑藉美國改證資料要求台灣法院變更其戶籍性別。
當前部分跨性別團體的操作策略，聲稱為「無力負擔變性手術的窮人」發聲，實則運用國際資源與法律漏洞為己所用，進行「個案繞道」。此類行為既非普遍正義，也未經制度設計，卻輕易影響整體性別登記體系。
2025-05-11 www.savoirtw.org/article/4835
#人類觀察日記 #新噁男 #免術換證 #selfid
0
0
0
0
張茵惠：
Christine Goodwin當年的處境若放到今日，幾乎沒有任何有基本良知的生理女性會不支持她打官司取得權益。
但現在社會同婚已通過、跨性已相對受到承認，這21年來節節上升的似乎只有擁有社會經濟優勢的生理男性所獲得的制度性便利，兩性薪資差距仍未消除，男同志配偶擁有「理論上」最高的經濟能力，甚至可以跨國買孕母，而某些跨性別者甚至主張自己不需要做手術，就應該取得女性身分跟女性保障名額。
2025-05-11 www.savoirtw.org/article/4835
#人類觀察日記 #新噁男 #免術換證 #selfid
0
0
1
0
張茵惠：
即使是跨性別女性，有時仍在不自覺地重演男性行為模式。比如在言論空間中強勢主導，在資源競爭中傾向要求優先考慮自身需求，在權利衝突時傾向用「我受壓迫，所以我站在正義的一邊」來壓倒性地要求順從。導致越來越多聲音批判跨運「不是真正解構性別壓迫，而是用另一套認同，延續既有的支配模式」。
2025-05-11 www.savoirtw.org/article/4835
#人類觀察日記 #新噁男 #免術換證 #selfid
0
0
0
0
張茵惠：
一些跨團強調「語言矯正」（例如要求使用 they/them 或懲罰錯稱），也讓原本願意支持的自由派與女性主義者轉而產生抗拒感與言論自由的焦慮。
「Self-ID」更進一步讓支持跨性別變成了一個地雷遍佈的區域，英語世界的知名女性主義者不乏反對者，譬如Germaine Greer、Julie Bindel、Helen Joyce 等人，她們的言論或許不如JK 羅琳那樣粗暴聳動，但所欲回應的社會焦慮現象則沒有很大差別。
2025-05-11 www.savoirtw.org/article/4835
#人類觀察日記 #新噁男 #免術換證 #selfid
0
0
1
0
not feeling like myself lately
#photooftheday
#sony
#abstract
#surreal
#surrealism
#dreams
#dreamsandnightmares
#nophotoshop
#selfID
2
0
0
0
Extracted Para 472 with my own **** emphasis added: 472. The majority of the Committee belleves that the concerns raised, while recognising that such views are sincerely held, go beyond the scope of the provisions in the Bill, and is satisfied that the Bill itself will not change any of the protections or definitions set out in the Equality Act 2010, including the ability to exclude trans people from single-sex services where proportionate and appropriate. The majority is satisfied that the Bill will not change or remove women's rights, make changes to how toilets and changing rooms operate, redefine what a man or a woman is, nor change or expand trans people's rights. The majority is satisfied that the Bill will not change the effect of a GRC, which is that the individual is legally recognised in their acquired gender. Further, the majority recognise that, ***when asked about evidence of abuse and concerns, no witness was able to provide concrete examples***.
Glad your a pond user. You don't mention any harms visited upon you by the simple presence of trans women.
Scottish Parliament in 2020 found, under oath neither did any of the anti trans groups giving evidence against #SelfID produce direct concrete examples. Para 472 Stage One Report.
3
1
1
0
Scottish GRA Reform Consultations continue, internal SNP party hostility cause a pause to proceed with 64% in favour of proposed reforms similar to Ireland. The delay came in on the day Iceland adopted #SelfID. 2nd smaller Consultation takes place, Covid overwhelms UK & analysis capacity.
5
0
1
0
3
1
1
0
Scottish Lesbians piece.
@hleehurley.com
Broad claims #SelfID isn't working completely unsubstantiated.
0
0
2
0
#SelfID Self Determination across the world. Can't keep up with what Republicans are doing in the states and hope for an eventual reset. Judge our absolute outlier status for yourselves. It's glaring, dark & very cruel. AND #Labour Fascists are very proud of their work.
bsky.app/profile/neve...
2
0
0
0
On Channel 5 last night. Under delusion, he's regarded as a hero, "cabbies tooting, folk wanting to thank him" for something, etc. #PiersMorgan suggests he shares some of his views BUT no mention of his scripting anti trans violence in #ITCrowd "The Speech" 7yrs prior to his alleged #SelfID trigger.
2
0
0
0
Back to #Linehan's segment, he's of the opinion; from a #Scottsdale #Arizona perspective that he is now lauded in England, cabbies tooting, hordes thanking him etc. #SelfID started him off; he says. No mention of inconvenient #ITCrowd "The Speech" & anti trans violence he scripted circa 7yrs prior.
3
0
1
0
![Judgment of the Court in Case C-247/23 | [Deldits] abridged
GDPR and transgender identity: the rectification of data relating to gender identity cannot be made conditional upon proof of surgery
In the first place, the Court observes that, under the GDPR and, in particular, the principle of accuracy set out in that regulation, the data subject has the right to obtain from the controller, the rectification of inaccurate personal data concerning him or her. That regulation thus gives specific expression to the fundamental right enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union ('the Charter'), "according to which everyone has the right of access to data which has been collected concerning him or her, and the right to have it rectified. In that regard, the Court recalls that the assessment of whether those data are accurate and complete must be made in the light of the purpose for which those data were collected.
In the present case, after observing that the data processing concerned falls within the material scope of the GDPR the Court indicates that it is for the Hungarian court to verify the accuracy of the data at issue, in the light of the purpose for which they were collected. If the purpose of collecting those data was to identify the data subject, those data would appear to refer to that person's lived gender identity, and not to the identity assigned to them at birth. Court clarifies that a Member State cannot rely on the absence, in its national law, of a procedure for the legal recognition of transgender identity in order to limit the exercise of the right to rectification. Although EU law does not detract from the Member States' competence in the area of the civil status of persons and the legal recognition of their gender identity, those States must, however, in exercising that competence, comply with EU law, including the GDPR, read in the light of the Charter.
Communications Directorate Press and Information Unit
curia.europa.eu](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:f3jfofsqidk7uegozoa4hvsx/bafkreifs43e7f4ybprlhagwq37if2vnylpli5ze6jmq7e4nq6thrflapzu)
Judgment of the Court in Case C-247/23 | [Deldits] abridged GDPR and transgender identity: the rectification of data relating to gender identity cannot be made conditional upon proof of surgery In the first place, the Court observes that, under the GDPR and, in particular, the principle of accuracy set out in that regulation, the data subject has the right to obtain from the controller, the rectification of inaccurate personal data concerning him or her. That regulation thus gives specific expression to the fundamental right enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union ('the Charter'), "according to which everyone has the right of access to data which has been collected concerning him or her, and the right to have it rectified. In that regard, the Court recalls that the assessment of whether those data are accurate and complete must be made in the light of the purpose for which those data were collected. In the present case, after observing that the data processing concerned falls within the material scope of the GDPR the Court indicates that it is for the Hungarian court to verify the accuracy of the data at issue, in the light of the purpose for which they were collected. If the purpose of collecting those data was to identify the data subject, those data would appear to refer to that person's lived gender identity, and not to the identity assigned to them at birth. Court clarifies that a Member State cannot rely on the absence, in its national law, of a procedure for the legal recognition of transgender identity in order to limit the exercise of the right to rectification. Although EU law does not detract from the Member States' competence in the area of the civil status of persons and the legal recognition of their gender identity, those States must, however, in exercising that competence, comply with EU law, including the GDPR, read in the light of the Charter. Communications Directorate Press and Information Unit curia.europa.eu
Consequently, the Court concludes that the GDPR must be interpreted as requiring a national authority responsible for keeping a public register to rectify the personal data relating to the gender identity of a natural person where those data are inaccurate, within the meaning of that regulation. In the second place, the Court finds that, for the purposes of exercising their right to rectification, that person may. be required to provide relevant and sufficient evidence that may reasonably be required in order to establish that those data are inaccurate. However, a Member State may not, under any circumstances, make the exercise of the right to rectification conditional upon the production of evidence of gender reassignment surgery. Such a requirement undermines, in particular, the essence of the right to the integrity of the person and the right to respect for private life, referred to in Articles 3 and 7 of the Charter respectively. Furthermore, such a requirement is, in any event, not necessary or proportionate in order to ensure the reliability and consistency of a public register such as the asylum register, since a medical certificate, including a psychiatric diagnosis, may constitute relevant and sufficient evidence in that regard. NOTE: A reference for a preliminary ruling allows the courts and tribunals of the Member States, in disputes which have been brought before them, to refer questions to the Court of Justice about the interpretation of European Union law or the validity of a European Union act. The Court of Justice does not decide the dispute itself. It is for the national court or tribunal to dispose of the case in accordance with the Court's decision, which is similarly binding on other national courts or tribunals before which a similar issue is raised.
This may be useful further down the line. I can see why #SelfID so threatens the UK control freakery.
3
0
0
0
Intro ONE
Did this on #Transgender #SelfID across world as a pinned tweet on that other place. Rough Guide.
1st group of pages: SelfID **Some with a pre-condition, made clear in comments.
"Better than Britain" Rough guide to inclusion. Wiki really quite good too.
Plain alphabetic list at end.
7
2
2
3