SlimeGate 3.2.3.2: Covering up Dissent on IARC’s 3rd Talc Monograph IARC’s 3rd talc monograph did not reflect the experts’ dissent. Instead they covered it up to project a consensus.

Part 2 of my #SlimeGate talc exposé is up.
IARC's third talc monograph reclassified talc as probably carcinogenic even though the evidence was similar to the second monograph.
There was dissent among the working group experts.
IARC didn't report the dissent.
risk-monger.com/2026/03/12/s...

My latest #SlimeGate series looks at how IARC changed their methodology (rather than presenting new evidence) to ensure that talc finally got a carcinogenic verdict.
Part 1 shows how the three talc monographs differ and questions IARC's scientific integrity.
risk-monger.com/2026/03/02/s...

SlimeGate 3.2.3.1 – IARC’s Talc Journey Part 1: A Tale of Three Talcs This exposé on IARC’s three talc monographs shows an agency willing to change their methodology to meet their political objectives.

In the coming weeks I'll release a new #SlimeGate series on how IARC moved the goalposts for its three talc monographs.
How IARC moved from Group 3 to 2B to 2A without significant new research shows how the agency relies more on special interests than science.
risk-monger.com/2026/03/02/s...

The Ramazzini Institute was founded for the wrong reasons, by the wrong people and with the wrong strategy.
Now that their money has run out, we bid farewell to their decades of lies, fears and bullshit.
They will not be missed.
#SlimeGate
risk-monger.com/2026/01/25/s...

SlimeGate 3.2.2: IARC’s Attack on Atrazine IARC is up to their old tricks again. We are starting to learn to ignore them.

My latest Risk-Monger #SlimeGate article looks at IARC's attack on atrazine and other pesticides.
From their two-page release, a clear distinction can be drawn between respected scientists and IARC's activist scientists.
risk-monger.com/2025/11/26/s...

SlimeGate 2.3.4: The Litigation Finance Whistleblower Exposé Part 2 Litigation finance ethical challenges are made worse when we see how big external investors are pulling the strings and taking most of the payouts.

Part 2 of the #SlimeGate #LitigationFinance whistleblower exposé is out.
Here John shares his struggles with large external investors trying to push his lending practices toward their special interests.
We learn about the numbers, the profits and the dark corruption.
risk-monger.com/2025/11/04/s...

The #LitigationFinance whistleblower exposé not only shows what's going on behind the curtains of the most corrupt loan shark lending industry in America, it also gives the Risk-Monger space at the end to propose ways to address the problems.
#SlimeGate
risk-monger.com/2025/10/27/s...

In the #SlimeGate whistleblower exposé into the litigation finance industry, the real villains are the partners.
They hire young analysts to do their dark, dirty work while they move among the Predatorts looking for more sinister ways to rip everyone off.
risk-monger.com/2025/10/27/s...

My latest with the litigation finance whistleblower revealed some interesting information.
If a court awards a plaintiff $2 million, the lenders step in and take $1 million.
These are bloody loan sharks!!!
It is not about the victims.
#SlimeGate #Predatort
risk-monger.com/2025/10/27/s...

SlimeGate 2.3.3: The Litigation Finance Whistleblower Exposé Part 1 I interviewed a former litigation finance analyst willing to blow the whistle on the corrupt industry.

See Part 1 from my meetings with a former analyst at a large litigation finance company.
His revelations fill in many blanks on their corrupt, unethical practices.
#SlimeGate is my largest research work and this exposé is perhaps its most important contribution.
risk-monger.com/2025/10/27/s...