Smartphones and Mental Health Awareness and Utilization in a Low-Income Urban Community: Focus Group Study
Background: Mental health disorders pose a significant challenge in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), contributing substantially to the global disease burden. Despite the high prevalence of these disorders, LMICs allocate less than 1% of health budgets to mental health, resulting in inadequate care and a severe shortage of professionals. Stigma and cultural misconceptions further hinder access to mental health services. These challenges are present in Bangladesh, with high prevalence rates of depression and anxiety, a centralized and under-resourced mental health care system. Digital tools, such as smartphone applications and online platforms, offer innovative solutions to these challenges by increasing accessibility, cost-effectiveness, and scalability of mental health interventions. Objective: This study aims to characterise the views around digital tools for mental health among residents of Korail, a major slum in Dhaka, Bangladesh, including the use of smartphones and investigate acceptable digital tools, and barriers and facilitators for digital mental health tools. Methods: Eight focus group discussions were conducted with 38 participants, including individuals with serious mental disorders and their caregivers. The FGDs were guided using a semi-structured topic guide which included broad questions on smartphone usage to contextualise digital access with primarily focusing on perceptions of using mobile technology for mental health care. Focus groups were held in Bangla, audio record and transcribed and translated in English. Data were analysed using thematic analysis in NVivo 14. Results: Participants (mean age 37 ± 13.7 years) were mostly female (79%), and 45% personally owned smartphones, although 92% reported smartphone access within the household. The findings revealed a general lack of awareness and understanding of digital mental health tools among slum residents. However, there was a notable appetite in these tools, recognising their potential to provide timely and cost-effective support, reduce hospital visits, and make healthcare more accessible. Participants highlighted the convenience and communication benefits of smartphones but expressed concerns about misuse such as excessive use, particularly among adolescents. Barriers to the utilisation of digital mental health tools included limited technological literacy and accessibility issues. Despite these challenges, participants acknowledged the potential of these tools to bridge the gap in mental health services, especially for those unable to travel. The importance of providing proper guidance and education to maximize the effectiveness of digital tools was emphasized. Conclusions: Digital mental health tools hold promises for improving mental health care in underserved slum communities. This study underscores the need for further research and investment in tailored digital mental health solutions to address the unique needs of slum populations in LMICs.
