#𝗖𝗖𝗪𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟱 𝗛𝗶𝗴𝗵𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁𝘀 – 𝗦𝗲𝗲 𝗧𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗺 𝘅 𝗢𝗯𝘃𝗶𝗼𝘀 𝘅 𝗦𝗧𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗠𝗪𝗜𝗗𝗘 𝗖𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗮𝗯𝗼𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 | STREAMWIDE #𝗖𝗖𝗪𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟱 𝗛𝗶𝗴𝗵𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁𝘀 – 𝗦𝗲𝗲 𝗧𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗺 𝘅 𝗢𝗯𝘃𝗶𝗼𝘀 𝘅 𝗦𝗧𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗠𝗪𝗜𝗗𝗘 𝗖𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗮𝗯𝗼𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 At CCW 2025, we were proud to present our collaboration with See Telecom and Obvios – a joint offer bringing resilient, secure, a...

#𝗖𝗖𝗪𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟱 𝗛𝗶𝗴𝗵𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁𝘀 – 𝗦𝗲𝗲 𝗧𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗺 𝘅 𝗢𝗯𝘃𝗶𝗼𝘀 𝘅 𝗦𝗧𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗠𝗪𝗜𝗗𝗘 𝗖𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗮𝗯𝗼𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻

#CriticalCommunications #MissionCritical #MCDATA #MCVIDEO #MCPTT #5G #Dôme5G #TunnelSafety #TeamOnMission #Streamwide #Obvios #SeeTelecom www.linkedin.com/posts/stream...

LA Tunnel Collapse! 🚨 31 rescued, NO injuries! 🙌 Learn critical safety: Know your ground, use protective systems, be emergency ready!

AP Safety Training offers trenching/excavation solutions. Protect your team! Link in bio.

#SafetyFirst #TunnelSafety #Construction

🔍 Thermal Inspection in the technical rooms of our road tunnels🔥 Several hotspots were detected⚠️
Our findings highlight the importance of preventive inspections in reducing electrical and fire risks in tunnel infrastructure. 🛠️ Corrective actions are now being planned! ✅ #BM #Maintain #tunnelsafety

Ambulance Commanders’ Reluctance to Enter Road Tunnels in Simulated Incidents and the Effects of a Tunnel-Specific e-Learning Course on Decision-Making: Web-Based Randomized Controlled Trial Background: The optimal response to a major incident in a road tunnel involves efficient decision-making among the responding emergency services (fire and rescue services, police, and ambulances). The infrequent occurrence of road tunnel incidents may entail unfamiliarity with the tunnel environment and lead to uncertain and inefficient decision-making among emergency services commanders. Ambulance commanders have requested tunnel-specific learning materials to improve their preparedness. Objective: We aimed to assess decision-making among ambulance commanders in simulated road tunnel incidents after they had participated in a tunnel-specific e-learning course designed to support timely and correct decisions in this context. Methods: We conducted a web-based intervention study involving 20 participants from emergency medical services in Sweden who were randomly allocated to a test or control group. The control group (n=10, 50%) received a lecture on general incident management, while the intervention group (n=10, 50%) completed an e-learning course consisting of 5 modules focused on tunnel structure, safety, and collaboration in response. The participants took part in 2 simulation-based assessments for ambulance commander decision-making in major road tunnel incidents 1 month and 6 months after their allocated study intervention. In each simulation, the participants decided on the best course of action at 15 independent decision points, designed as multiple-choice questions. The primary outcome was the correct response to the question regarding how to appropriately enter the road tunnel. The secondary outcome measurements were correct or incorrect responses and the time taken to decide for each of the 15 decisions. Limited in-depth follow-up interviews were conducted with participants (n=5, 25%), and collected data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results: All 20 participants completed the first simulation, and 16 (80%) completed the second. The main finding was that none (0/20, 0%) of the participants correctly answered the question on entering the tunnel system in the 1-month assessment. There were no significant differences between the groups (P=.59; 2-sample test of proportions) in the second assessment. The e-learning course was not associated with more correct answers at the first assessment, including accounting for participant factors (mean difference between groups: –0.58 points, 95% CI –1.88 to 0.73; P=.36). The e-learning course was also not associated with a shorter time to completion compared to the nonintervention group in either assessment. Interviews identified 3 categories linked to the main outcome: information (lack of), risk (limited knowledge and equipment), and mitigation (access to maps and aide-mémoire). Conclusions: Participation in a tunnel-specific e-learning course did not result in a measurable change in ambulance commanders’ decision-making behavior during simulated road tunnel incidents. The observed hesitation to enter the road tunnel system may have several plausible causes, such as the lack of actionable intelligence and tunnel-specific plans. This novel approach to assessing commander decision-making may be transferable to other educational settings.

JMIR Formative Res: Ambulance Commanders’ Reluctance to Enter Road Tunnels in Simulated Incidents and the Effects of a Tunnel-Specific e-Learning Course on Decision-Making: Web-Based Randomized Controlled Trial #EmergencyResponse #AmbulanceServices #TunnelSafety #DecisionMaking #Elearning

Generative AI Transforms Tunnel Safety With Smart Inspections and Autonomous Drones Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology has developed generative AI-powered inspection technology that creates synthetic images of tunnel damage to address data scarcity and enhan...

Generative AI Transforms Tunnel Safety With Smart Inspections and Autonomous Drones 🚀🤖🛣️ www.azoai.com/news/2025031... #AI #GenerativeAI #SmartCities #Infrastructure #TunnelSafety #AutonomousDrones #CivilEngineering #UrbanTech #InspectionTech