#UkParliament hashtag - Bluesky

Declassified Granted Parliamentary Press Access After Seven-Month Dispute Declassified has secured access to the UK Parliament after a seven-month dispute with Westminster authorities over its application for a press pass. The independent investigative outlet was initially denied accreditation in June, with officials citing limited space. However, internal emails later revealed that decision-makers had referenced the “particular standpoint” of Declassified’s reporting, including its investigations into alleged pro-Israel bias in Westminster. Officials also questioned whether the outlet’s focus on foreign affairs qualified as political coverage. The rejection sparked criticism from journalists, politicians, and press freedom advocates. Approximately 5,800 readers signed an open letter urging Parliament to reconsider the decision. The letter was backed by more than 100 public figures, including Members of Parliament, prominent journalists, comedians, and leaders of major press freedom organizations. Additionally, 27 MPs from across the political spectrum supported an Early Day Motion calling for the reversal of the decision. In response to mounting pressure, parliamentary authorities reviewed the case and ultimately granted Declassified a media pass. The dispute also led to procedural changes in how press credentials are handled. Authorities clarified application criteria, introduced a formal appeals process, and modified resubmission rules. Responsibility for approving passes was shifted away from the Sergeant At Arms, although Parliament stated this change was not directly linked to the controversy. Declassified’s co-director described the outcome as a significant moment for press freedom, emphasizing concerns about broader restrictions on civil liberties in the UK. The case highlights ongoing debates about media access, transparency, and equal treatment for independent news organizations within established political institutions.

1 month ago

Declassified Granted Parliamentary Press Access After Seven-Month Dispute

🤖 IA: It's not clickbait ✅
👥 Usuarios: It's not clickbait ✅

#pressfreedom #ukparliament #independentjournalism

View full AI summary:

0 0 0 0

Samantha Niblett MP

@samanthaniblett.bsky.social

1 month ago

A little bit of behind the scenes. ❤️

What a GLORIOUS day in London. ☀️

#SouthDerbyshire #WeNotMe #UkParliament #HousesofParliament #BigBen

3 0 2 0

Legal and International Steps Required to Remove Prince Andrew from the Line of Succession The UK government is considering whether Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, currently eighth in line to the British throne, could be removed from the royal line of succession following his recent arrest on suspicion of misconduct in public office. Although he has denied any wrongdoing and was released after 11 hours of questioning, the situation has reignited public and political debate about his constitutional status. While the likelihood of Andrew ever becoming king is remote—given that he follows Prince William, William’s three children, Prince Harry, and Harry’s two children in the line of succession—many argue that formally removing him would carry symbolic importance. A recent YouGov poll cited in the report indicates that 82% of the British public would support his removal. Legally, altering the line of succession in the United Kingdom would require an Act of Parliament passed at Westminster. However, the matter is more complex than domestic legislation alone. King Charles III is not only the monarch of the United Kingdom but also head of state of 14 other Commonwealth realms, including Australia, Canada, and New Zealand. Any change to the rules of succession would require the agreement of these countries as well, reflecting shared constitutional arrangements. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has reportedly expressed support for any move to remove Andrew from the line. The UK government has stated that it will consider potential legislative steps once the ongoing police investigation concludes. The situation highlights both the legal intricacies and international coordination involved in modifying royal succession laws.

1 month ago

Legal and International Steps Required to Remove Prince Andrew from the Line of Succession

🤖 IA: It's not clickbait ✅
👥 Usuarios: It's not clickbait ✅

#royalsuccession #princeandrew #ukparliament

View full AI summary:

0 0 0 0

UK MPs Order Release of Government Files on Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s Trade Envoy Appointment Members of Parliament have approved a motion compelling the UK government to release official documents related to Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s appointment as a trade envoy in 2001. The Liberal Democrats used a parliamentary mechanism known as a humble address to force ministers to disclose files, including any vetting documents associated with his appointment. The government supported the motion, with Trade Minister Sir Chris Bryant confirming that it would comply as quickly as possible, while cautioning that an ongoing police investigation could delay the process. Andrew, who served as special representative for international trade and investment from 2001 to 2011, was recently released under investigation following his arrest on suspicion of misconduct in public office. He has strongly denied any wrongdoing. Allegations under consideration by police include claims linked to his association with the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and accusations that he shared confidential government material. Recently released US court documents allege that in 2010 he forwarded official reports from overseas visits and information about investment opportunities to Epstein. Andrew has denied any improper conduct and any personal financial gain from his trade envoy role. During the Commons debate, Sir Chris Bryant sharply criticized Andrew’s conduct, accusing him of self-interest and entitlement. He argued that releasing the documents is necessary for transparency and accountability, particularly in light of Epstein’s crimes and the broader network of individuals accused of enabling abuse. Conservative and Liberal Democrat MPs stressed the importance of swift disclosure. The Business and Trade Select Committee indicated it may launch its own inquiry once legal proceedings conclude. The motion passed without opposition, increasing pressure for greater scrutiny of Andrew’s past public role.

1 month ago

UK MPs Order Release of Government Files on Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s Trade Envoy Appointment

🤖 IA: It's not clickbait ✅
👥 Usuarios: It's not clickbait ✅

#ukparliament #princeandrew #tradeenvoy

View full AI summary:

0 0 0 0

Parliamentary Debate on Prince Andrew Signals Changing Attitudes Toward Royal Accountability Members of the UK Parliament have openly criticised Prince Andrew during a formal debate, marking a notable departure from longstanding conventions that traditionally shield the Royal Family from direct criticism in the House of Commons. The debate, initiated by the Liberal Democrats, called for the release of documents related to Andrew’s 2001 appointment as the UK’s trade envoy. Several MPs used strong language to describe their concerns about his conduct and questioned the oversight and transparency surrounding his decade-long tenure in the role. The discussion also revisited allegations that Andrew shared sensitive information with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, whose associations with prominent public figures have sparked ongoing controversy. While Andrew has denied wrongdoing and has not responded to recent BBC requests for comment regarding newly released US files connected to Epstein, MPs argued that the public deserves greater clarity about his official duties and how concerns were handled at the time. The debate itself was significant because parliamentary tradition, guided by Erskine May, discourages members from casting reflections on the sovereign or the Royal Family. Although not a strict prohibition, this guidance has historically limited direct criticism. In this instance, however, MPs appeared willing to challenge those conventions, reflecting shifting public attitudes toward accountability and transparency. Buckingham Palace has maintained its position of not commenting on matters that could affect ongoing police investigations, focusing instead on supporting due legal process. The debate concluded with MPs backing a motion to release relevant documents, underscoring growing pressure for transparency and demonstrating how public sentiment is influencing parliamentary norms.

1 month ago

Parliamentary Debate on Prince Andrew Signals Changing Attitudes Toward Royal Accountability

🤖 IA: It's not clickbait ✅
👥 Usuarios: It's not clickbait ✅

#princeandrew #ukparliament #royalfamily

View full AI summary:

0 0 0 0

Luke

@bentz161.bsky.social

1 month ago

We are seeing in real time what happens when those who commit war crimes, genocide and those part of a global pedophile/human & sex trafficking ring receive zero accountability from those in the positions to do so at global level.

#UnitedStates #Israel #EuropeanUnion #UKParliament #UnitedNations

8 4 0 2

Let’s Rethink Parliament: The Hidden Filters Let’s Rethink Parliament:The Hidden Filters Who enters Parliament isn’t accidental. This post looks at how working norms and incentives quietly shape who can say yes — and who opts out.

1 month ago

Long before the ballot paper, a quieter decision gets made.

“Could I actually live like this?”

Post 11 of Let’s Rethink Parliament looks at who the system attracts — and who it quietly pushes away 👇

#LetsRethink #UKParliament #Representation #Politics #SystemsThinking

0 0 0 0

Let’s Rethink Parliament: Who Chaos Attracts Let’s Rethink Parliament: Who Chaos Attracts. Parliament doesn’t just reflect who stands for election — it quietly filters who can stay. This post explores how working patterns shape representation.

1 month ago

Let’s Rethink Parliament: Who Chaos Attracts.

We say we want Parliament to reflect the country.

This post asks what the system quietly rewards — and what it pushes away 👇

#LetsRethink #UKParliament #Representation #WorkPatterns #SystemsThinking

0 0 0 0

Let’s Rethink Parliament: Inherited Chaos Let’s Rethink Parliament: Inherited Chaos. Late nights and unpredictable hours shape who thrives in Parliament. This post asks what happens when a working day evolves by habit, not design.

1 month ago

If we were designing Parliament today,
would we really choose midnight votes and unpredictable hours?

Post 9 of Let’s Rethink Parliament looks at the working day nobody designed 👇
#LetsRethink #UKParliament #WorkPatterns #Democracy #SystemsThinking

0 0 0 0

Let’s Rethink Parliament: The Momentum Mismatch Let’s Rethink Parliament: The Momentum Mismatch Committees are designed for serious scrutiny — but often operate under pressure. This post explores how time, urgency, and momentum quietly sideline them..

1 month ago

The Momentum Mismatch

Parliament already built the tools for serious scrutiny.

This post isn’t about failure —
it’s about what happens when urgency outruns examination.

Let’s Rethink Parliament — Post 8 👇

#LetsRethink #UKParliament #Committees #Democracy #SystemsThinking

0 0 0 0

Let’s Rethink Parliament: The Silent Engine Let’s Rethink Parliament: The Silent Engine. Committees are where Parliament slows down to think. This post explores how they work, why they matter, and why they’re often overlooked.

1 month ago

The Silent Engine

If Parliament sometimes looks unserious, it isn’t because seriousness is absent.

It’s because the places designed for it aren’t where attention naturally settles.

Let’s Rethink Parliament — Post 7 👇
#LetsRethink #UKParliament #Democracy #Governance #SystemsThinking

0 0 0 0

Let’s Rethink Parliament: Outcomes Over Optics Let’s Rethink Parliament: Outcomes, Not Optics. Parliament is highly visible — but its most important outcomes are often quiet. This post asks what gets lost when optics crowd out stewardship.

1 month ago

Outcomes, Not Optics.

The hardest work in Parliament often leaves the smallest trace.

This post isn’t about targets or metrics —
it’s about what quietly disappears when outcomes are hard to see.

Let’s Rethink Parliament — Post 6 👇
#LetsRethink #UKParliament #Politics #SystemsThinking #Governance

0 0 0 0

Let’s Rethink Parliament: The Transparency Trap Let’s Rethink Parliament: The Transparency Trap. Cameras brought transparency to Parliament — but also changed how work is seen and rewarded. This post asks what that’s done to time, focus, and outcomes.

1 month ago

We can now watch Parliament as it happens.
Clips circulate. Reactions land fast.

This post asks a quieter question:
has visibility reshaped how politicians think about time and outcomes?

Let’s Rethink Parliament — Post 5 👇
#LetsRethink #UKParliament #Politics #SystemsThinking #Media

0 0 0 0

✨ Bambi Alice | The DreamGate

@candyflosscity.bsky.social

1 month ago

For your Attn: @baronesskeeley.bsky.social

The Wall of Attrition — Article 6 (Access to Justice)
Today, the State’s failure moved from ‘inaction’ to ‘obstruction’

🔗 x.com/candyflossci...

— Jessica White aka. Bambi Jess
#UKParliament #DigitalErasure #Trans #TransRights #HumanRights #BreakingNews

0 0 0 0

Let’s Rethink Parliament: The MP’s Invisible Workload Let’s Rethink Parliament: Not All MPs Work the Same Way — And We All Pretend They Do. Some MPs are highly visible, others work quietly. This post explores why Parliament struggles to talk about contribution — and what that does to trust.

1 month ago

Some MPs are instantly recognisable.
Others are harder to place — even if they’re working just as hard.

This post isn’t about blame.
It’s about how Parliament signals what matters.

Let’s Rethink Parliament — Post 4 👇

#LetsRethink #UKParliament #Politics #SystemsThinking #Democracy

0 0 0 0

@nafala25.bsky.social

1 month ago

It smell Bribery & Corruption
#ukparliament
@news.rte.ie
@lbc.co.uk
@bbcnewsnight.bsky.social

0 0 0 0

Let’s Rethink Parliament: How Often Does Parliament Really Sit? The House of Commons sits around 150 days a year. That scarcity quietly shapes behaviour, incentives, and how politics actually works.

1 month ago

Parliament doesn’t pause — but its calendar does.

When time is scarce, behaviour changes.
Delay becomes leverage.
Performance crowds out patience.

New post in the Let’s Rethink Parliament series 👇

#LetsRethink #UKParliament #Politics #SystemsThinking

0 0 0 0

@aegeanobsessed.bsky.social

1 month ago

The UK now has
The Conservatives
Labour
Conform
The Greens
The LibDems
Your Shambles
Lowe's Restoration Comedy Party
and an electoral system built around two parties
#UKParliament #ElectoralReform #Newscast #TheRestisPolitics #TheNewsAgents

0 0 0 0