Advertisement · 728 × 90
#
Hashtag
#altana
Advertisement · 728 × 90

Significado de #altana Terraço ou varanda de uma estrutura elevada.. altana

0 0 0 0

Meaning of #altana Terrace or balcony of an elevated structure.. altana

0 0 0 0

Significado de #altana Terraza o balcón de una estructura elevada.. altana

0 0 0 0
Post image

Altana fortified church, Transylvania, Romania (Alzen, Siebenbürgen, Rumänien)
#Transylvania #Romania #Altana

6 0 0 0
Post image

Altana fortified church, Transylvania, Romania (Alzen, Siebenbürgen, Rumänien)
#Transylvania #Romania #Altana

21 1 0 0
Post image

Altana fortified church, Transylvania, Romania (Alzen, Siebenbürgen, Rumänien)
#Transylvania #Siebenbürgen #Altana

79 6 1 0
Post image

📢🚀 Die JCF-Industrietour 2025 macht Halt bei Altana! 🚀📢
Am 03.06.2025 besuchen wir Altana (@altanagroup) in Wesel. 🏢
Melde dich bis zum 20.05.2025 an und sei dabei:
🔗https://forms.gle/TGaxoxnQiF9nJVgB7
#JCFIndustrietour #JungesChemieForum #Networking #Chemie #Karriere #Altana

0 1 0 0

🌳 W XIX wieku altany ogrodowe były nieodłącznym elementem ogrodów w stylu romantycznym. Często stawiano je w oddaleniu od domu, by stworzyć „tajemniczy zakątek” idealny do czytania poezji, pisania listów lub... potajemnych spotkań 💌😉 #altana #ogrod #ciekawostka

1 0 0 0
Post image

To się nazywa #altana ogrodowa

1 0 0 0
older, I've kind of watched the world progress, studied more of history, and read some Mearsheimer, and I've actually kind of come to the exact opposite view
- meaning peace gives rise to free trade and not the other way around.
When there is an equilibrium in the whole global geopolitical great power competition, then what you see through history is that trade progresses between nations; and then in the moments of disequilibrium and big shifts in power, those become more violent. Then trade collapses. And so, my fear right now is that we're in a disequilibrium. You have a rising great power. You have multipolarity with Russia and the EU asserting themselves in different ways, and the US, at least on a relative basis as a declining power, is no longer the single global hegemony. Over the last 15 years, if

older, I've kind of watched the world progress, studied more of history, and read some Mearsheimer, and I've actually kind of come to the exact opposite view - meaning peace gives rise to free trade and not the other way around. When there is an equilibrium in the whole global geopolitical great power competition, then what you see through history is that trade progresses between nations; and then in the moments of disequilibrium and big shifts in power, those become more violent. Then trade collapses. And so, my fear right now is that we're in a disequilibrium. You have a rising great power. You have multipolarity with Russia and the EU asserting themselves in different ways, and the US, at least on a relative basis as a declining power, is no longer the single global hegemony. Over the last 15 years, if

what happened in Trump's first term, when there was a bunch of Chinese economic policy and trade barriers that were put up, was you saw a big shift in Chinese supply chains going to Mexico and Canada, where two things happened.
In one case, they would just do final assembly, so they'd ship all the
refrigerator parts to Mexico, turn it into a refrigerator, and then import it into the United States under USMCA and not pay
tariffs. The other version of it was through what's called the e-commerce de minimis threshold, where the premise was like, if the goods are under $800, we don't need to do a whole customs entry, pay tariffs, and put a trade compliance process in place. Let's just rip it into the country and get consumers what they want.
So then, unsurprisingly, you had these mega warehouses built up on the Mexican and Canadian borders, where

what happened in Trump's first term, when there was a bunch of Chinese economic policy and trade barriers that were put up, was you saw a big shift in Chinese supply chains going to Mexico and Canada, where two things happened. In one case, they would just do final assembly, so they'd ship all the refrigerator parts to Mexico, turn it into a refrigerator, and then import it into the United States under USMCA and not pay tariffs. The other version of it was through what's called the e-commerce de minimis threshold, where the premise was like, if the goods are under $800, we don't need to do a whole customs entry, pay tariffs, and put a trade compliance process in place. Let's just rip it into the country and get consumers what they want. So then, unsurprisingly, you had these mega warehouses built up on the Mexican and Canadian borders, where

competition, China now has between 60 percent and 98 percent of the world's critical minerals on lockdown, and they use that market position now to kill any emergent refining in a country or a company that they don't control.
So a new one pops up, and we're refining lithium, and we're doing Lithium oxides.
Well, you're going to see, and this has happened repeatedly, China floods the market, depresses the price, and puts that company out of business. They either go away, or the Chinese company buys them.
And so, the reason this really matters is that you can't make missiles, airplanes, guns, telephones, or GPS |without these minerals. Our everyday modern economy depends on all these critical minerals, and they all run through China.
So, can that be fixed in four years? No, not without a radical sort of World War Il-style change in our regulatory stance, our willingness to invest, and a massive cross-border partnership with our allies.

competition, China now has between 60 percent and 98 percent of the world's critical minerals on lockdown, and they use that market position now to kill any emergent refining in a country or a company that they don't control. So a new one pops up, and we're refining lithium, and we're doing Lithium oxides. Well, you're going to see, and this has happened repeatedly, China floods the market, depresses the price, and puts that company out of business. They either go away, or the Chinese company buys them. And so, the reason this really matters is that you can't make missiles, airplanes, guns, telephones, or GPS |without these minerals. Our everyday modern economy depends on all these critical minerals, and they all run through China. So, can that be fixed in four years? No, not without a radical sort of World War Il-style change in our regulatory stance, our willingness to invest, and a massive cross-border partnership with our allies.

think the Trump thesis here is, "Let's remove the barriers to building, let's create the barriers to what they view as unfair trade and economic abuses by adversaries. Let's let the market figure out the rest."
And you're asking, is there a third way? In general, my perspective is that the United States can't possibly out-centralize China.
It can't possibly out-execute top-down
¿conomic control better than China does.
Our comparative advantage, our right to win, is through innovation. So create a rule of law and a risk capital
environment, and a labor environment where the best ideas can win, people can take risks, and that can flush through the system - that has been our comparative advantage. I'm more sympathetic to an economic security framework that plays to our right to win than one that doesn't. I think the Biden kind of Freakonomics thing you described was very much like,
"Okay, let's sort of take other examples of

think the Trump thesis here is, "Let's remove the barriers to building, let's create the barriers to what they view as unfair trade and economic abuses by adversaries. Let's let the market figure out the rest." And you're asking, is there a third way? In general, my perspective is that the United States can't possibly out-centralize China. It can't possibly out-execute top-down ¿conomic control better than China does. Our comparative advantage, our right to win, is through innovation. So create a rule of law and a risk capital environment, and a labor environment where the best ideas can win, people can take risks, and that can flush through the system - that has been our comparative advantage. I'm more sympathetic to an economic security framework that plays to our right to win than one that doesn't. I think the Biden kind of Freakonomics thing you described was very much like, "Okay, let's sort of take other examples of

‘we work with governments of the West and allies to…find…dependencies and vulnerabilities in these [supply chain] networks, and to mitigate them…help them simulate policies…then we work with the private sector…

[O]ur mission is to fix globalization’

#Altana

www.theverge.com/decoder-podc...

1 0 0 0