Heute schließen wir die gemeinsame Reihe zur Session „(In)visible #women in #history of #archaeology“ #s334 der #EAA2023 mit einem Betrag auf dem Projekt @beyondnotables zu Wikidata ab: https://aktarcha.hypotheses.org/6860
In vorletzten Beitrag unserer Reihe zur Session „(In)visible women in history of archaeology“ #s334 der #EAA2023 geht es um "Frauen und die sardische Archäologie": https://aktarcha.hypotheses.org/6784
In unserer Reihe zur Session „(In)visible women in history of archaeology“ #s334 der #EAA2023 erscheint heute Teil 2 von "Frühe Frauen in der prähistorischen Archäologie: Berlin, 1880er bis 1930er Jahre": https://aktarcha.hypotheses.org/6625
Auch wir haben unseren Beitrag zur Session „(In)visible women in history of archaeology“ #s334 der #EAA2023 verschriftlicht. Heute erscheint Teil 1 von "Frühe Frauen in der prähistorischen Archäologie: Berlin, 1880er bis 1930er Jahre: https://aktarcha.hypotheses.org/6617
Heute geht es im Beitrag zur Session „(In)visible women in history of archaeology“ #s334 der #EAA2023 um Regina Volkaitė-Kulikauskienė (1916–2007), Rimutė Rimantienė (1920–2023) und Marija Alseikaitė-Gimbutienė (1921–1994), 3 #Archäologinnen Litauens: https://aktarcha.hypotheses.org/6549
In unserer Reihe zur Session „(In)visible women in history of archaeology“ #s334 der #EAA2023 stellen wir heute Caroline Amy Hutton (1860-1931) vor, die als wegweisende britische #Archäologin in Griechenland tätig war: https://aktarcha.hypotheses.org/5955
Heute geht es im Beitrag zur Session „(In)visible women in history of archaeology“ #s334 der #EAA2023 um Anna Apostolaki (1881–1958), eine „sichtbare“ griechische #Archäologin: https://aktarcha.hypotheses.org/5502
Heute beginnt in unserem Blog eine Reihe von Artikeln zur Session „(In)visible women in history of archaeology“ #s334 auf dem 29. Annual Meeting der @archaeologyEAA #EAA2023: https://aktarcha.hypotheses.org/5942
In unserem heutigen Blogbeitrag zu frühen #Archäologinnen blicken wir auf die Session „(In)visible women in history of archaeology“ #s334 auf dem 29. EAA Annual Meeting #EAA2023 @archaeologyEAA @age_eaa in Belfast zurück: https://aktarcha.hypotheses.org/3213
Tagungsrückblick #EAA2023: @archaeologiskop hat die Session #s334 „(In)visible Women in History of Archaeology“ in 2 Threads zusammengefasst. Hier die Links dazu:
https://t.co/9sV9PBgBR0
und
https://t.co/AzKBFZay7L
It was striking to see: Even if every female archaeologist’s life and professional biography was different, they had still in common that all had to find their individual ways into a profession that was not made for them #s334 #EAA2023 14/15
Big thanks to all co-organizers of the session, and especially to the volunteer who helped us the whole day!
We are now discussing publication options for the session “(In)visible Women in History of Archaeology” #s334 #EAA2023. If we have news on that, we will share them 15/15
They point out that their assumptions, the women on the 1949 ‚Limes‘ Congress photo were spouses or wives of participating archaeologists were wrong: Most women in the picture were at the congress as researchers and on their own #s334 #EAA2023 12/15
Finally, Marta Santos Retolaza et al presented the International Summer Courses of Ampurias since 1947. While fieldwork in Spanish archaeology were almost exclusively for men, this Summer Courses provided safe spaces for women to engage in field archaeology #s334 #EAA2023 13/15
One female archaeologist they introduced was Ruth Kossack, wife of archaeologist Georg Kossack (1923-2004). She helped him in his work e.g. with translations. A picture taken at his PhD shows them both https://t.co/Qx6fo7vXUY #s334 #EAA2023 10/15
They also showed examples of how archives can be used to re-discover women in archaeology #s334 #EAA2023 9/15
Gabriele Rasbach, Kerstin Hofmann @KerstinPHofmann and Sandra Schröer introduced Propylaeum Vitae @Propylaeum_FID, a biographical information system for archaeology https://sempub.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/propylaeum_vitae/de #s334 #EAA2023 8/15
Mauro Puddu was talking about the importance of local authorities in archaeology, who might not be trained archaeologists, but know the landscape and its features. Those local experts might as well be women #s334 #EAA2023 7/15
Next, Tove Hjørungdal presented two very visible women in Swedish archaeology: Lili Kaelas (1919-2007) and Märta Strömberg (1921-2012), both working in megalith research. She also showed a tradition of female scholars in megalith investigation #s334 #EAA2023 6/15
Reena Perschke introduced us to Erika Trautmann (1897-1968), and her work on petroglyphs. She managed to get her own expeditions in the 1930s & 1940s, but was also deeply involved in national-socialist academia of the 3rdReich #s334 #EAA2023 4/15
Ana Solter searched for female archaeologists in Croation Archaeology. About many women in archaeology, we have notes from Viktor Hoffiller (1877-1954), director of the National Museum. According to him, many were suffering from “nerves” #s334 #EAA2023 3/15
After a short break, Ammandeep Mahal @beyondnotables introduced us to WikiData, and explained how they can be used to research and archive data on women in archaeology. The database of the Beyond Notability Project can be found at https://t.co/6QPiIAYjkw #s334 #EAA2023 2/15
On Friday 1st Sept the session “(In)visible Women in History of Archaeology” #s334 #EAA2023 took place – co-organized by @archaeologiskop @ElsbethBoesl @AktArcha, Ammandeep Mahal @beyondnotables, Laura Coltofean-Arizancu & Tove Hjørungdal. Here is a summary of the day(🧵2/2) 1/15
Unfortunately, the talk on women archaeologists of Ukraine had to be cancelled last minute. The speaker wanted to join digitally, but as her town got under the treat of rocket fire, internet went down. The session participants agreed to send their best wishes #s334 #EAA2023 21/22
The abstract of her paper (and of all the other papers in session #s334) can be found in the abstract book PDF pages 446-453, available for download at the #EAA2023 conference website https://www.e-a-a.org/EAA2023/Programme.aspx?Program=3 22/22
(to be continued in 🧵nr. 2)
In early 20thcentury, prehistoric archaeology became an academic field. Women, who rarely had the chance to get university degrees, were left behind in that process #s334 #EAA2023 20/22
Next, we went to Berlin. @ElsbethBoesl presented the case of women in prehistoric archaeology from 1880s to 1930s. She argues that prehistoric archaeology was shaped by citizen science and archaeological societies, were women had many opportunities to engage #s334 #EAA2023 19/22
Paloma Zarzuela shows how interviews can be used as methodological approach to understand the past & present of women in archaeology #s334 #EAA2023 18/22
