While Ono's UM departure welcomed by critics, there's a worry of brand damage
Some University of Michigan faculty and students on Monday welcomed President Santa Ono's decision to leave the institution, arguing that he tried to "centralize" decision-making at UM and didn't fight the Trump administration's higher education policies.
But one alumnus worried that Ono's announcement on Sunday that he plans to step down after being selected as the sole finalist for the University of Florida's presidency will hurt Michigan's brand as a prestigious university.
Scott Greer, a UM professor of health management and policy and a political scientist, said the UM community had "tremendously high hopes" for Ono when he first arrived.
"A lot of people really wanted him to succeed," Greer said. "And it became disappointing for, I think, practically every stakeholder very, very quickly."
There was much discussion among UM faculty of holding a vote of no confidence in Ono for "failing to provide leadership," said Rebekah Modrak, a professor in the Penny W. Stamps School of Art & Design. Until May 1, Modrak chaired the Senate Advisory Committee on University Affairs, which is the nine-member executive arm of UM's central faculty governance system.
The vote didn't happen, but nearly 93% of the UM Faculty Senate voters supported a motion to enter into a mutual defense pact with other Big Ten schools.
Ono's imminent departure from Ann Arbor is coming after less than three years at the helm — the shortest in the university's history — and follows campus unrest over the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza and the dismantling of the Office of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion. Recently, four Democratic regents urged Ono to resist President Donald Trump's threats to strip colleges of research dollars unless they ended their DEI efforts, scrub the curricula of far-left ideology and aggressively combat antisemitism.
More: Finley: The insult that cost the University of Michigan its president
Some faculty on Monday argued that higher education is under attack and said Ono wasn't "a wartime leader" and failed to "defend academic freedom." One graduate student said Ono opposed the student movement seeking to isolate Israel amid the Israel-Hamas war and is glad that Ono is leaving.
But Rabbi Davey Rosen, chief executive officer of University of Michigan Hillel, noted that Ono led Michigan "during a very difficult period for Jewish students."
"Over the past several months, President Ono has made it clear that antisemitism has no place at Michigan and taken a series of steps to make sure that UM remains a place in which Jewish students are free from harassment, intimidation and attacks," Rosen said in a statement. "We hope that this is something that the next president continues to build on."
In a message to the UM community Sunday, Ono wrote that he expects to assume the new role at the University of Florida later this summer once the appointment is approved by the University of Florida's board of governors. He called serving as UM's president during the past three academic years a distinct honor.
“Every day, I have been inspired beyond words by the vibrancy, brilliance, and dedication of our faculty, staff, students, and alumni,” he wrote. “I will miss the extraordinary intellectual vitality that fills our classrooms and laboratories, the sublime sounds of our musical and theatrical performances, and the roar of fans cheering on the Wolverines — or singing ‘Mr. Brightside’ together in joyful unity.”
UM spokesperson Kay Jarvis said Ono is declining interview opportunities at this time.
Recent presidents, including Mary Sue Coleman and James Duderstadt, led the university for 13 years and eight years, respectively. Lee Bollinger left the UM presidency in 2001 to lead Columbia University, a prestigious Ivy League institution.
Hurting 'the brand'
John Mularoni, a 1981 UM graduate and a retired communications consultant, said he worries about "this focus on politics hurting the University of Michigan brand."
He read a Detroit News column on Monday that reported that meddling by the Democratic majority Board of Regents led to Ono’s departure.
“There are a lot of people who are nonideological and non-lefties who went to Michigan,” said Mularoni, who is 67 and lives in Bloomfield Hills. “The fact that Ono faced pressure on DEI and politics will hurt the brand. He is going to a Florida college system that is focused on academics, not politics. It’s a reflection on Michigan and the liberal, Democratic majority on the Board of Regents, not Ono.”
But Modrak argued that Ono was missing in action as the Trump administration took actions that undermined what she and others considered academic freedom.
"In winter semester, as many faculty and universities were working furiously to create coalitions to defend higher education and research funding for life-saving, culture-changing, and economy-building research, President Ono went AWOL," she said in a statement. "He canceled both of his President's Council meetings. He didn't show up for an appointment to meet with SACUA."
Modrak said she spent most of her year as chair defending the institution "from Ono's assaults on campus speech and his punitive turn toward student activism, his reduction of our campus to a surveillance state by hiring plain clothes officers to trail and photograph students and the installation of thousands of high-powered surveillance cameras on our public square and across campus, his failure to defend academic freedom, his choice to remove our Office of DEI and fire valuable staff," and other actions by Ono.
Ono and the regents have argued that they defended freedom of expression while pursuing students and others who crossed the line. A new free speech policy, approved in January 2024, noted: "Our deep commitment to free expression does not extend to speech or conduct that violates the law or University policy, including targeted speech that involves bullying, defamation, destruction of property, harassment, violence, or threats."
The homes of several UM leaders, including Ono, were vandalized with pro-Palestinian messages, while the law office and home of Regent Jordan Acker, who is Jewish, were vandalized.
Modrak noted that Ono was unable to "build bridges," failed to meet with survivors of sexual abuse and was unwilling to "attempt to listen to the students protesting the war on Gaza."
Silke-Maria Weineck, a professor of German studies and comparative literature at the university, said Ono has not engaged in "shared governance."
"He has completely ignored faculty governance's input and student governance input," she said.
Weineck said Ono closed the DEI office "without any consultation with the faculty." She also said Ono's policies "centralized power" in UM's administration.
Weineck noted that this is "an incredibly dangerous moment for universities."
"You need a fighter," she said. "You need a really savvy and courageous fighter, and that is not who Ono is."
Greer, the professor of health management and policy, said most faculty are "very relieved to see him go."
"His behavior in the last six months makes a great deal more sense if you know he was auditioning for a red state job with a high salary and not a lot of dignity," he said, referring to Florida.
The Alumni Association of the University of Michigan "doesn’t have anything to add" regarding the news of Ono's departure, spokesman Rob Clendening said.
Students react to Ono's departure
“I say good riddance,” said Ember McCoy, 33, of Ann Arbor, and a UM graduate student who has opposed Attorney General Dana Nessel's criminal charges against pro-Palestinian student protesters, charges that were dropped Monday.
He views Ono as part of the campaign opposed to the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement seeking to isolate Israel. But he said Ono's departure "doesn't solve all of our problems."
"The regents are very much invested in remaining invested in Israel and repressing the movement on campus and across the community. I’m glad he’s gone, and I would like to think that activism on campus played a role in making him unhappy here. But ... whoever is picked for president next could be the same or worse.”
Tiffany Pang, 24, of Ann Arbor, who graduated this year from UM with a degree in economics, said Ono’s departure was sudden.
“I was surprised,” she said, wearing her cap and gown outside of the Michigan Union late Monday morning. “He hasn’t been here very long.”
Pang said a lot of students like her were not happy with the university’s decision to dissolve the school’s diversity and inclusion programs in response to an executive order by President Donald Trump that pledged to end federal aid for institutions that didn't end their DEI programs.
“I think maybe his leaving is good news," Pang said.
asnabes@detroitnews.com
cramirez@detroitnews.com
This article originally appeared on The Detroit News: While Ono's UM departure welcomed by critics, there's a worry of brand damage