Under the Open Practices Collection #AMPPS has a lot of papers that might be of interest: journals.sagepub.com/topic/collec... . You can browse the other collections as well. For very accessible AI ethics, I liked this paper...
Now published, the #DECIDEFramework in #AMPPS. Here we provide a suite of resources to support researchers with ethical considerations in digital behavioural research. journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....
How do we improve the implementation of open science? Let's start with the terms. Excellent new paper out in #AMPPS-- see this thread by @katiecorker.bsky.social! @psychscience.bsky.social
🚨 New study alert! We're excited to share our "Bestiary of Questionable Research Practices in Psychology" in #AMPPS. We tackle the credibility crisis in research by defining, collecting, and categorizing QRPs using a community consensus method. 🧵#OpenScience #QRPs @psychscience.bsky.social
🤝 MetaROR is (once again) happy to announce a new partner: Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science.
#AMPPS "publishes innovative developments in research methods, practices and conduct [...] within psychological science".
👇 See our full list of partners on our website
Replace me! Serving as EiC at #AMPPS has been wonderful-- great people, great ideas, great work! You should go for it.
Entering my final year as editor of @psychscience.bsky.social #AMPPS in 2025. I'd love for us to receive papers on open science practices in human neuroscience-- any of the sub-areas (social, affective, etc)! Send us a best practices paper. Also: which are the strong papers out there now?
オンライン調査におけるデータ品質のチェック状況について（2022）。注意チェックですら20%ちょいしかないって，逆に本当か？と疑ってしまうくらいだけど，2年前だとそんなもんか。
Gottfried (2024). Practices in Data-Quality Evaluation: A Large-Scale Review of Online Survey Studies Published in 2022 https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459241236414
#サイコロabst #AMPPS
査読において統計値の間の不整合を検出する「statcheck」を利用することの効果について実証的に検討した研究。
Nuijten & Wicherts (2024). Implementing Statcheck During Peer Review Is Related to a Steep Decline in Statistical-Reporting Inconsistencies https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459241258945
#サイコロabst #AMPPS
同じデータでも異なる分析を適用すれば異なる結論につながる。そこで，DeclareDesignによるシミュレーションで優先すべき分析を判断できる（多分）。
Bishop & Hulme (2024). When Alternative Analyses of the Same Data Come to Different Conclusions: A Tutorial Using DeclareDesign With a Worked Real-Wo... https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459241267904
#サイコロabst #ResTools #AMPPS
測定の標準誤差と推定の標準誤差の意味や解釈について整理した論文。
Stanley & Spence (2024). The Comedy of Measurement Errors: Standard Error of Measurement and Standard Error of Estimation https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459241285885
#サイコロabst #ResTools #AMPPS
マルチレベル構造を持つデータの分析における問題と文献の誤った解釈が再現性のない研究が生み出される背景にあるのでは？という論文（多分）。
Gelman & Brown (2024). How Statistical Challenges and Misreadings of the Literature Combine to Produce Unreplicable Science: An Example From Psychology https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459241276398
#サイコロabst #ResTools #AMPPS
経験サンプリングで収集されたデータの事前処理についてのフレームワークと研究者向けの様々なツールを示したよという論文。
Revol et al. (2024). Preprocessing Experience-Sampling-Method Data: A Step-by-Step Framework, Tutorial Website, R Package, and Reporting Templates https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459241256609
#サイコロabst #ResTools #AMPPS
経験サンプリング研究のための10の論点についてまとめた。（a）他のアプローチとの比較（b）項目内容（c）選択肢（d）時間スケール（e）変化特性と定常性（f）検定力と効果量（g）欠損、脱落、遵守（h）データ評価と管理（i）信頼性（j）再現性と一般化可能性。
Fritz et al. (2024). So You Want to Do ESM? 10 Essential Topics for Implementing the Experience-Sa... https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459241267912
#サイコロabst #ResTools #AMPPS
オープンエンドなデータ（自由記述）のコーディングにおける報告には現状大きな課題があるので、定量的なコーディングについて透明性をもって報告するためのガイドラインを提案した。
Conry-Murray et al. (2024). Validity and Transparency in Quantifying Open-Ended Data https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459241275217
#サイコロabst #ResTools #AMPPS
Could we be hypothesizing/expecting/preregistering impossible effect size? Yes, for sure. Check out this new paper van Tilburg X2 at #AMPPS: journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/... @psychscience.bsky.social
AND they will also begin officially accepting *registered reports* for original research, replication studies, and secondary data analyses. We are so excited to see CPS join #AMPPS and @PsychScience in leading the field in open science practices.
I'm very excited to announce that starting April 1, #AMPPS @PsychScience will require transparent peer review. You can read the details here in the update submission guidelines. www.psychologicalscience.org/publications/ampps/ampps...
A little thread on...
