Advertisement · 728 × 90
#
Hashtag
#AustralianConservationFoundation
Advertisement · 728 × 90

#auspol #AustralianConservationFoundation #ACF

4 1 0 0
Preview
Ancient rock art site under threat as Australian government provisionally extends 'carbon bomb' gas project The 50,000-year-old carvings on the Burrup Peninsula include the earliest-known depictions of a human face

"Protecting Indigenous cultural heritage is the right thing to do and makes good business sense." ~ Responsible Investment Association Australasia

#corporateresponsibilty #WoodsideEnergy #AustralianConservationFoundation #WesternAustralia #AustralianFederalGovernment #archaeology #indigenousculture

0 0 0 0
Preview
Conservation foundation alleges illegal land clearing on NSW properties The Australian Conservation Foundation says vulnerable species like the malleefowl and pink cockatoo are suffering a "death by a thousand cuts" due to land clearing.

Conservation foundation alleges illegal land clearing on NSW properties #landclearing #australianconservationfoundation #malleefowl

0 0 0 0
The Australian Conservation Foundation Scorecard Explained

What is ACF's election scorecard?

The Australian Conservation Foundation's election scorecard is designed to help voters understand how well the climate and nature policies of political parties and candidates align with ACF's national agenda.

We have assessed the main parties (Labor, Liberal/National Coalition, Greens), incumbent independent MPs in the House of Representatives and independent candidates in electorates with high numbers of ACF supporters.

What it's not

ACF's scorecard is not an endorsement of any party or candidate. It's an issue-based assessment that shows how closely parties and candidates align with our policy agenda for protecting nature and acting on climate.

Methodology

1. Survey - we asked parties and candidates if they supported each of the 16 outcomes in ACF's national agenda.

2. Research - we analysed the parties and candidates' survey responses, public policies, voting records and statements and measured them against all 54 tests of success in ACF's national agenda.

In instances where candidates/parties have not responded to the survey, ACF has assessed their public statements and policies alone.

How we determined the final scores

ACF's national agenda outlines four key policy goals, 16 outcomes needed to achieve those goals, and 54 detailed tests of success.

Each outcome in ACF's national agenda is worth 3 to 5 points (based on ACF's priorities) on the scorecard. Points for outcomes are split across the relevant tests of success.
We awarded full, partial or no points, based on evidence from the surveys and our research.
We shared an interim score with candidates and parties to give them a chance to provide further information or context before we determined a final score.

Final scores were converted to: 
Supports - Green Dot (>70%) 
Partially supports - Orange Dot (50-70%) or Opposes - Red Dot (<50%)

To learn more about ACF or our scorecard visit acf.org.au/scorecard

The Australian Conservation Foundation Scorecard Explained What is ACF's election scorecard? The Australian Conservation Foundation's election scorecard is designed to help voters understand how well the climate and nature policies of political parties and candidates align with ACF's national agenda. We have assessed the main parties (Labor, Liberal/National Coalition, Greens), incumbent independent MPs in the House of Representatives and independent candidates in electorates with high numbers of ACF supporters. What it's not ACF's scorecard is not an endorsement of any party or candidate. It's an issue-based assessment that shows how closely parties and candidates align with our policy agenda for protecting nature and acting on climate. Methodology 1. Survey - we asked parties and candidates if they supported each of the 16 outcomes in ACF's national agenda. 2. Research - we analysed the parties and candidates' survey responses, public policies, voting records and statements and measured them against all 54 tests of success in ACF's national agenda. In instances where candidates/parties have not responded to the survey, ACF has assessed their public statements and policies alone. How we determined the final scores ACF's national agenda outlines four key policy goals, 16 outcomes needed to achieve those goals, and 54 detailed tests of success. Each outcome in ACF's national agenda is worth 3 to 5 points (based on ACF's priorities) on the scorecard. Points for outcomes are split across the relevant tests of success. We awarded full, partial or no points, based on evidence from the surveys and our research. We shared an interim score with candidates and parties to give them a chance to provide further information or context before we determined a final score. Final scores were converted to: Supports - Green Dot (>70%) Partially supports - Orange Dot (50-70%) or Opposes - Red Dot (<50%) To learn more about ACF or our scorecard visit acf.org.au/scorecard

The Australian Conservation Foundation Scorecard Explained with Alt-Text

#AusPol #AusVotes25 #PreferentialVoting #AustralianConservationFoundation
#ForPeopleAndPlanet
#AltText
#Community
#AccessibilityForAll
#MakeINFORMEDdecisions

acf-election-scorecard-from-abysmal-to-amazing

0 0 1 0
The Australian Conservation Foundation's Election Scorecard shown in table form where YES was marked with a green dot, PARTIALLY was marked with an orange dot, and NO was marked with a red dot. 

Which parties and candidates have committed to:

Save nature
Champion renewables
Reject nuclear
No new coal and gas

AUSTRALIAN LABOR PARTY
Save nature No
Champion renewables Yes
Reject nuclear Yes
No new coal and gas No

GREENS
Save nature Yes
Champion renewables Yes
Reject nuclear Yes
No new coal and gas Yes

LIBERAL & NATIONAL COALITION
Save nature No
Champion renewables No
Reject nuclear No
No new coal and gas No

ALLEGRA SPENDER - YES to all 
ANDREW GEE - NO to all
ANDREW WILKIE - YES to all
BOB KATTER - NO to all
CAZ HEISE - YES to all
DAI Le - NO to all

DEB LEONARD
Save nature Yes
Champion renewables Yes
Reject nuclear Partially 
No new coal and gas Yes

HELEN HAINES - Yes to all
JESS Ness - YES to all

KATE CHANEY
Save nature No
Champion renewables Yes
Reject nuclear Yes
No new coal and gas Partially 

KATE DEZARNAULDS
Save nature No
Champion renewables Yes
Reject nuclear Yes
No new coal and gas Partially 

MONIQUE RYAN - YES to all
NICOLETTE BOELE - YES to all

REBEKHA SHARKIE
Save nature Yes
Champion renewables Partially
Reject nuclear No
No new coal and gas Partially

RUSSELL BROADBENT - NO to all

SOPHIE SCAMPS
Save nature Yes
Champion renewables Yes
Reject nuclear Partially 
No new coal and gas Yes

ZALI STEGGALL - YES to all
ZOE Daniel - YES to all

The Australian Conservation Foundation's Election Scorecard shown in table form where YES was marked with a green dot, PARTIALLY was marked with an orange dot, and NO was marked with a red dot. Which parties and candidates have committed to: Save nature Champion renewables Reject nuclear No new coal and gas AUSTRALIAN LABOR PARTY Save nature No Champion renewables Yes Reject nuclear Yes No new coal and gas No GREENS Save nature Yes Champion renewables Yes Reject nuclear Yes No new coal and gas Yes LIBERAL & NATIONAL COALITION Save nature No Champion renewables No Reject nuclear No No new coal and gas No ALLEGRA SPENDER - YES to all ANDREW GEE - NO to all ANDREW WILKIE - YES to all BOB KATTER - NO to all CAZ HEISE - YES to all DAI Le - NO to all DEB LEONARD Save nature Yes Champion renewables Yes Reject nuclear Partially No new coal and gas Yes HELEN HAINES - Yes to all JESS Ness - YES to all KATE CHANEY Save nature No Champion renewables Yes Reject nuclear Yes No new coal and gas Partially KATE DEZARNAULDS Save nature No Champion renewables Yes Reject nuclear Yes No new coal and gas Partially MONIQUE RYAN - YES to all NICOLETTE BOELE - YES to all REBEKHA SHARKIE Save nature Yes Champion renewables Partially Reject nuclear No No new coal and gas Partially RUSSELL BROADBENT - NO to all SOPHIE SCAMPS Save nature Yes Champion renewables Yes Reject nuclear Partially No new coal and gas Yes ZALI STEGGALL - YES to all ZOE Daniel - YES to all

The Australian Conservation Foundation Scorecard with Alt-Text

#AusPol #AusVotes25 #PreferentialVoting #AustralianConservationFoundation
#ForPeopleAndPlanet
#AltText
#Community
#AccessibilityForAll
#MakeINFORMEDdecisions

acf-election-scorecard-from-abysmal-to-amazing

4 4 2 0
Preview
Koala populations under threat in Australia A blog about gourmet travel of interest to those who love wine and food.

How #Australia is failing its #koalas. #wildlife #tourism #development #government #nature #AustralianConservationFoundation www.gourmetontheroad.com/2025/01/koal...

0 0 0 0
Preview
Koala The koala is one of Australia's most iconic species. A tree-climbing marsupial, koalas are under threat from tree-clearing, and development for housing and farms.

Koala
www.acf.org.au/koala
#AustralianConservationFoundation

0 0 1 0
Post image

#australianconservationfoundation #anthonyalbanese @australianlabor.bsky.social

0 0 0 0