Advertisement · 728 × 90
#
Hashtag
#ForPeopleAndPlanet
Advertisement · 728 × 90

Yo esto lo veo como que #TaxTheSuperRich #ForPeopleAndPlanet es tan evidente que hasta la Casa Real lo apoya.

6 0 0 0
Video

CLASP and our partners are dedicated to solving the world’s most pressing, interconnected crises: the climate emergency, poverty, inequality, and access to energy: #ForPeopleAndPlanet.

Explore our solutions: https://www.clasp.ngo/

1 0 0 0

Este finde se reúnen en Sudáfrica los jefes de estado del G20. No os perdáis la proyección que ha organizado @patrioticmillionaires.org como parte del movimiento global que demanda #TaxTheSuperRich #ForPeopleAndPlanet.
El 100% de las personas y el planeta lo necesitamos urgentemente #G20SouthAfrica

3 1 0 0

No me canso de decirlo, pero por si no ha quedado claro, #TaxTheSuperRich. #ForPeopleAndPlanet. Es la solución para reducir la desigualdad y generar recursos públicos que se inviertan en políticas públicas y lucha contra el cambio climático.

13 12 0 0

Dilo tata y ya sabéis, por si no ha quedado suficientemente claro #TaxTheSuperRich #ForPeopleAndPlanet

4 2 0 0

#TaxTheSuperRich #ForPeopleAndPlanet

3 0 0 0

Esto pasa cuando se desmantelan los servicios públicos. Hay que defender lo público, hacer que los superricos paguen los impuestos que les corresponde e invertir en las personas y en el planeta. En resumen: #TaxTheSuperRich #ForPeopleAndPlanet #MakeRichPollutersPay

4 1 0 0
Post image

The Educator Academy in the Amazon bridges the gap between biodiversity education and conservation action. Through fieldwork and professional development, teachers become agents of change aligned with the goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. #EducationTransforms #GBFGoals #ForPeopleAndPlanet

0 1 0 0

Este hilo! Vivimos en un mundo donde el 1% más rico tiene más riqueza que el 95% de la humanidad. Donde una comerciante en Uganda paga como Xosé un 40% de impuestos, mientras los milmillonarios pagan de media un 0,3%! #TaxTheSuperRich #ForPeopleAndPlanet.

5 0 0 0
Preview
Home - CLASP CLASP is the leading global authority on efficient appliances’ role in fighting climate change and improving people's lives.

CLASP and our partners are dedicated to solving the world’s most pressing, interconnected crises: the climate emergency, poverty, inequality, and access to energy: #ForPeopleAndPlanet
Explore our solutions: www.clasp.ngo

2 0 0 0
Post image

How do energy-efficient appliances drive impact? At the @iea.org Global Conference on Energy Efficiency, CLASP’s Bishal Thapa elaborated with Nicolas Nuttall.
Get our efficiency solutions: www.clasp.ngo

#ForPeopleAndPlanet

1 0 0 0
Video

To mobilize increased finance #ForPeopleAndPlanet, we have a three-fold message for attendees here at #UNOC3

🌊 Let's build partnerships
🌊 Engage the private sector
🌊 And support those furthest behind

0 0 0 0
Video

At the Asia Clean Energy Forum, our experts emphasized that energy efficiency is about more than saving watts & lowering emissions. It’s about reducing inequality, improving lives, & building systems that are resilient, affordable, & fair: lnkd.in/d5pvPuKS

#ACEF2025 @adb.org #ForPeopleAndPlanet

0 0 0 0
Post image

Join us at the @un.org Ocean Conference #UNOC3 where we’ll be building partnerships for #finance solutions that deliver #ForPeopleAndPlanet

Like the Global Fund for Coral Reefs co-led by @undp.org @unep.org UNCDF & partners to unlock domestic capital & attract private investment in the #BlueEconomy

0 0 0 0

We are here to transform societies, resist the fascists and the capitalists, rise with the people, and revive hope for a better future!
#EuropeanLeftAlliance #Porto2025 #ForPeopleAndPlanet #TaxTheRich #StopTheFarRight

2 0 0 0

#TaxTheSuperRich #ForPeopleAndPlanet es el primer paso que tenemos que dar para empezar a arreglar un sistema que está hecho para generar desigualdad extrema de manera intencionada.

12 3 0 1
The Australian Conservation Foundation Scorecard Explained

What is ACF's election scorecard?

The Australian Conservation Foundation's election scorecard is designed to help voters understand how well the climate and nature policies of political parties and candidates align with ACF's national agenda.

We have assessed the main parties (Labor, Liberal/National Coalition, Greens), incumbent independent MPs in the House of Representatives and independent candidates in electorates with high numbers of ACF supporters.

What it's not

ACF's scorecard is not an endorsement of any party or candidate. It's an issue-based assessment that shows how closely parties and candidates align with our policy agenda for protecting nature and acting on climate.

Methodology

1. Survey - we asked parties and candidates if they supported each of the 16 outcomes in ACF's national agenda.

2. Research - we analysed the parties and candidates' survey responses, public policies, voting records and statements and measured them against all 54 tests of success in ACF's national agenda.

In instances where candidates/parties have not responded to the survey, ACF has assessed their public statements and policies alone.

How we determined the final scores

ACF's national agenda outlines four key policy goals, 16 outcomes needed to achieve those goals, and 54 detailed tests of success.

Each outcome in ACF's national agenda is worth 3 to 5 points (based on ACF's priorities) on the scorecard. Points for outcomes are split across the relevant tests of success.
We awarded full, partial or no points, based on evidence from the surveys and our research.
We shared an interim score with candidates and parties to give them a chance to provide further information or context before we determined a final score.

Final scores were converted to: 
Supports - Green Dot (>70%) 
Partially supports - Orange Dot (50-70%) or Opposes - Red Dot (<50%)

To learn more about ACF or our scorecard visit acf.org.au/scorecard

The Australian Conservation Foundation Scorecard Explained What is ACF's election scorecard? The Australian Conservation Foundation's election scorecard is designed to help voters understand how well the climate and nature policies of political parties and candidates align with ACF's national agenda. We have assessed the main parties (Labor, Liberal/National Coalition, Greens), incumbent independent MPs in the House of Representatives and independent candidates in electorates with high numbers of ACF supporters. What it's not ACF's scorecard is not an endorsement of any party or candidate. It's an issue-based assessment that shows how closely parties and candidates align with our policy agenda for protecting nature and acting on climate. Methodology 1. Survey - we asked parties and candidates if they supported each of the 16 outcomes in ACF's national agenda. 2. Research - we analysed the parties and candidates' survey responses, public policies, voting records and statements and measured them against all 54 tests of success in ACF's national agenda. In instances where candidates/parties have not responded to the survey, ACF has assessed their public statements and policies alone. How we determined the final scores ACF's national agenda outlines four key policy goals, 16 outcomes needed to achieve those goals, and 54 detailed tests of success. Each outcome in ACF's national agenda is worth 3 to 5 points (based on ACF's priorities) on the scorecard. Points for outcomes are split across the relevant tests of success. We awarded full, partial or no points, based on evidence from the surveys and our research. We shared an interim score with candidates and parties to give them a chance to provide further information or context before we determined a final score. Final scores were converted to: Supports - Green Dot (>70%) Partially supports - Orange Dot (50-70%) or Opposes - Red Dot (<50%) To learn more about ACF or our scorecard visit acf.org.au/scorecard

The Australian Conservation Foundation Scorecard Explained with Alt-Text

#AusPol #AusVotes25 #PreferentialVoting #AustralianConservationFoundation
#ForPeopleAndPlanet
#AltText
#Community
#AccessibilityForAll
#MakeINFORMEDdecisions

acf-election-scorecard-from-abysmal-to-amazing

0 0 1 0
The Australian Conservation Foundation's Election Scorecard shown in table form where YES was marked with a green dot, PARTIALLY was marked with an orange dot, and NO was marked with a red dot. 

Which parties and candidates have committed to:

Save nature
Champion renewables
Reject nuclear
No new coal and gas

AUSTRALIAN LABOR PARTY
Save nature No
Champion renewables Yes
Reject nuclear Yes
No new coal and gas No

GREENS
Save nature Yes
Champion renewables Yes
Reject nuclear Yes
No new coal and gas Yes

LIBERAL & NATIONAL COALITION
Save nature No
Champion renewables No
Reject nuclear No
No new coal and gas No

ALLEGRA SPENDER - YES to all 
ANDREW GEE - NO to all
ANDREW WILKIE - YES to all
BOB KATTER - NO to all
CAZ HEISE - YES to all
DAI Le - NO to all

DEB LEONARD
Save nature Yes
Champion renewables Yes
Reject nuclear Partially 
No new coal and gas Yes

HELEN HAINES - Yes to all
JESS Ness - YES to all

KATE CHANEY
Save nature No
Champion renewables Yes
Reject nuclear Yes
No new coal and gas Partially 

KATE DEZARNAULDS
Save nature No
Champion renewables Yes
Reject nuclear Yes
No new coal and gas Partially 

MONIQUE RYAN - YES to all
NICOLETTE BOELE - YES to all

REBEKHA SHARKIE
Save nature Yes
Champion renewables Partially
Reject nuclear No
No new coal and gas Partially

RUSSELL BROADBENT - NO to all

SOPHIE SCAMPS
Save nature Yes
Champion renewables Yes
Reject nuclear Partially 
No new coal and gas Yes

ZALI STEGGALL - YES to all
ZOE Daniel - YES to all

The Australian Conservation Foundation's Election Scorecard shown in table form where YES was marked with a green dot, PARTIALLY was marked with an orange dot, and NO was marked with a red dot. Which parties and candidates have committed to: Save nature Champion renewables Reject nuclear No new coal and gas AUSTRALIAN LABOR PARTY Save nature No Champion renewables Yes Reject nuclear Yes No new coal and gas No GREENS Save nature Yes Champion renewables Yes Reject nuclear Yes No new coal and gas Yes LIBERAL & NATIONAL COALITION Save nature No Champion renewables No Reject nuclear No No new coal and gas No ALLEGRA SPENDER - YES to all ANDREW GEE - NO to all ANDREW WILKIE - YES to all BOB KATTER - NO to all CAZ HEISE - YES to all DAI Le - NO to all DEB LEONARD Save nature Yes Champion renewables Yes Reject nuclear Partially No new coal and gas Yes HELEN HAINES - Yes to all JESS Ness - YES to all KATE CHANEY Save nature No Champion renewables Yes Reject nuclear Yes No new coal and gas Partially KATE DEZARNAULDS Save nature No Champion renewables Yes Reject nuclear Yes No new coal and gas Partially MONIQUE RYAN - YES to all NICOLETTE BOELE - YES to all REBEKHA SHARKIE Save nature Yes Champion renewables Partially Reject nuclear No No new coal and gas Partially RUSSELL BROADBENT - NO to all SOPHIE SCAMPS Save nature Yes Champion renewables Yes Reject nuclear Partially No new coal and gas Yes ZALI STEGGALL - YES to all ZOE Daniel - YES to all

The Australian Conservation Foundation Scorecard with Alt-Text

#AusPol #AusVotes25 #PreferentialVoting #AustralianConservationFoundation
#ForPeopleAndPlanet
#AltText
#Community
#AccessibilityForAll
#MakeINFORMEDdecisions

acf-election-scorecard-from-abysmal-to-amazing

4 4 2 0

Balthasars Grüne Links wurde soeben publiziert! paper.li/bglaettli/gruene Beiträge u.a. von @MagaliDimarco @UCamlibel #greenrecoverynow #forpeopleandplanet

0 0 0 0