It's Jay Kiel yall. Make this judge famous #Bianco #JayKiel #Riverside #SiezedBallots #California #newsom #Bonta www.riversidecountygop.com/endorsed-can...
0
0
0
0
Hashtag
#Bonta
Advertisement · 728 × 90
**What is #Bonta hiding??
CA asks court to halt Riverside sheriff's seizure of 2025 ballots - CalMatters - calmatters.org/politics/202...
0
0
0
0
Post 1/4
Rob Bonta doesn’t need the Feds to stop the Paramount-WBD disaster. 🏛️
California has the Cartwright Act—a legal hammer designed to smash "information monopolies" and predatory trusts before they gut our economy. 🔨 #Antitrust #Bonta
1
1
1
0
#Bianco 's #ballotseizure is a threat to democracy & another attempt by 🔴 ( #Nazi) #electiondeniers to #disenfranchise #voters.🔥There is no indication, anywhere in the United States, of widespread voter fraud," #Bonta said. "Counts, #recounts, #handcounts, audits, and court cases all support this."
2
1
0
0
Your fighting back matters! Our own AG Bonta blocks Trump's fishing expeditions into Campus data. oag.ca.gov/news/press-r...
#bonta #politics #uspol #democracy
1
1
0
0
Expect lawsuits to block the deal or demands to sell off "crown jewels" like CNN or the historic Warner studio lot to preserve competition. This is far from a done deal. 📺🚫 #Bonta #DOJ #CNN #BreakingNews
1
0
0
0
We also unveiled two bills, #SB1422 ( #Durazo ) which would end the currently imposed freeze on Medi-Cal enrollment for undoc. Californians, & #AB2161 ( #Bonta ) which would prevent Trump-style work requirements from being imposed on some Californians. #Health4All
0
0
1
0
Per Curiam 6-3 decision
![Justice Barrett concurrence (Roberts and Kavanaugh join)
Cite as: 607 U.S. _ (2026)
BARRETT, J., concurring
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
No. 25A810
ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA,
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER
[March 2, 2026]
JUSTICE BARRETT, with whom THE CHIEF JUSTICE and
JUSTICE KAVANAUGH join, concurring.
As the dissent observes, substantive due process is a controversial doctrine. Judges typically interpret express constitutional rights, such as the freedom of speech or religion.
But substantive due process asks us to find unexpressed rights in a constitutional provision that guarantees only
"process" before a person is deprived of life, liberty, or prop-erty. U.S. Const., Amdt. 14, §1. When rights are unstated, how do judges know what they are? The obvious risk is that judges will use their own values as a guide, thereby jeopardizing the People's right to self-governance. To mitigate this risk, the Court has crafted a demanding test for recognizing unexpressed rights: They must be "deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition" and "implicit in the concept of ordered liberty." Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702, 721 (1997) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Relevant here, the doctrine of substantive due process has long embraced a parent's right to raise her child, which includes the right to participate in significant decisions about her child's mental health. See Pierce v. Society of Sisters,
268 U.S. 510 (1925); Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390
(1923); Parham v. J. R., 442 U. S. 584 (1979).
The parent-applicants are likely to succeed on the merits under a straightforward application of these cases. California prohibits its public schools from informing parents of](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:j22jo3rt2jtdh2nbaemoprcf/bafkreigdsivul4alheyjl32zu4c5fhffowhick3g5ns5uvl3lmleepr6li)
Justice Barrett concurrence (Roberts and Kavanaugh join) Cite as: 607 U.S. _ (2026) BARRETT, J., concurring SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER [March 2, 2026] JUSTICE BARRETT, with whom THE CHIEF JUSTICE and JUSTICE KAVANAUGH join, concurring. As the dissent observes, substantive due process is a controversial doctrine. Judges typically interpret express constitutional rights, such as the freedom of speech or religion. But substantive due process asks us to find unexpressed rights in a constitutional provision that guarantees only "process" before a person is deprived of life, liberty, or prop-erty. U.S. Const., Amdt. 14, §1. When rights are unstated, how do judges know what they are? The obvious risk is that judges will use their own values as a guide, thereby jeopardizing the People's right to self-governance. To mitigate this risk, the Court has crafted a demanding test for recognizing unexpressed rights: They must be "deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition" and "implicit in the concept of ordered liberty." Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702, 721 (1997) (internal quotation marks omitted). Relevant here, the doctrine of substantive due process has long embraced a parent's right to raise her child, which includes the right to participate in significant decisions about her child's mental health. See Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 (1925); Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923); Parham v. J. R., 442 U. S. 584 (1979). The parent-applicants are likely to succeed on the merits under a straightforward application of these cases. California prohibits its public schools from informing parents of
![Justice Kagan dissent (Justice Jackson joins)
Justice Sotomayor would deny the application in full.
Cite as: 607 U.S._
(2026)
1
KAGAN, J., dissenting
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
No. 25A810
ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. u. ROB BONTA,
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER
(March 2, 2026]
SCRUSTICE KAGAN, with whom JUSTICE: JAcKSoN joins, dis-
Today's decision shows, not for the first time, how our emergency docket can malfunction. A case raising novel legal questions and arousing strong views comes to this Court via an application about whether to stay a district court's injunction pending appeal. The ordinary appellate process has barely started; only a district court has ruled on the case's merits. The Court receives scant and, frankly, inadequate briefing about the legal issues in dispute. It does not hold oral argument or deliberate in conference, as reg. ular procedures dictate. It considers the request on a short fuse—a matter of weeks. And then the Court grants relief by means of a terse, tonally dismissive ruling designed to conclusively resolve the dispute. The Court does all this even though the application of existing law to the case raises tricky questions, and so cries out for reflection and explanation. The Court is impatient: It already knows what it thinks, and insists on getting everything over quickly.
See also, e.g., Department of State v. AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition, 606 U.S._
_ (2025) (KAGAN, J., dissent-
ing from grant of stay application) (slip op., at 2-3); Trump
v. Wilcox, 605 U.S. -
_ (2025) (KAGAN, J., dissenting
from grant of stay application) (slip op., at 2-3, 8).
Indeed, the precipitousness of the Court's decision today has yet a further-and wholly new-dimension: In granting](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:j22jo3rt2jtdh2nbaemoprcf/bafkreif76yao7a5xg744rqiujbptmlhqxyn3zhxd4z7zu4jqngdguqhhxu)
Justice Kagan dissent (Justice Jackson joins) Justice Sotomayor would deny the application in full. Cite as: 607 U.S._ (2026) 1 KAGAN, J., dissenting SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. u. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER (March 2, 2026] SCRUSTICE KAGAN, with whom JUSTICE: JAcKSoN joins, dis- Today's decision shows, not for the first time, how our emergency docket can malfunction. A case raising novel legal questions and arousing strong views comes to this Court via an application about whether to stay a district court's injunction pending appeal. The ordinary appellate process has barely started; only a district court has ruled on the case's merits. The Court receives scant and, frankly, inadequate briefing about the legal issues in dispute. It does not hold oral argument or deliberate in conference, as reg. ular procedures dictate. It considers the request on a short fuse—a matter of weeks. And then the Court grants relief by means of a terse, tonally dismissive ruling designed to conclusively resolve the dispute. The Court does all this even though the application of existing law to the case raises tricky questions, and so cries out for reflection and explanation. The Court is impatient: It already knows what it thinks, and insists on getting everything over quickly. See also, e.g., Department of State v. AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition, 606 U.S._ _ (2025) (KAGAN, J., dissent- ing from grant of stay application) (slip op., at 2-3); Trump v. Wilcox, 605 U.S. - _ (2025) (KAGAN, J., dissenting from grant of stay application) (slip op., at 2-3, 8). Indeed, the precipitousness of the Court's decision today has yet a further-and wholly new-dimension: In granting
consider this application for a reason. It’s part of an alarming trend. It’s a California case but it’s important. But I suspect it won’t get nearly the attention it deserves.
To put it bluntly: #abortion legal reporters should be reporting on this too.
#Mirabelli v. #Bonta #CA #SDP #rights
1
1
0
0
Côté jeux de plateau, une nouvelle mouture pour #Krosmaster ! Avec une boîte vous invitant à faire affronter 2 équipes dans les rues commerçantes de #Bonta !
Côté figurines ?
Judith, Jahash, Joris, Bakara, Kerubim, Lilotte, Khan et Marilyn ! 😄
0
0
1
0
better-experience.blogspot.com/2026/01/the-...
#ZOLTÁN #BONTA
multi-search-tag-explorer.aepiot.com/advanced-sea...
allgraph.ro
0
0
0
0
#neurology #Ipsen #Dysport #abobotulinumtoxinA #neurologicaldisease #clinicaldata #stroke #neurologicaldisorders #EPITOMEstudy #poststrokespasticity #PSS #strokepatients #realworlddata #strokesurvivors #botulinumtoxintypeA #BoNTA #PSStreatment #BoNTAinjectable #biopharmaceuticals
zurl.co/nLqKq
0
0
0
0
#elonmusk #nazi #elon #musk #coward #money #hitlergruß #nazis #Grok #MechaHitler #xAI #chatbot #TSLA #Tesla #tech #technology #fascist #fascism #SpaceX #kleptocracy #oligarchy #techbros #KKK #hate #cali #bonta #california #racism #racist #eugenics #immigrants #us #usa
www.kqed.org/news/1206980...
0
0
0
0
U.S.-based Sling TV to Pay $530,000 Settlement for Violating California Privacy Law California Attorney General Rob Bonta has announced a $530,000 Sling TV privacy fine against Sling TV LLC and Dis...
#Cyber #News #Firewall #Daily #California #Attorney […]
[Original post on thecyberexpress.com]
0
1
0
0
2
1
0
0
Will #Gavin support a lawsuit challenge claiming this is racial gerrymandering in TEXAS? (SCOTUS isn’t concerned w/political gerrymandering).
Would CA AG Rob Bonta have standing?
#Bonta #CA-AttorneyGeneral
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
#Trump Administration Threatens to Arrest #Newsom & #Bonta: www.facebook.com/SFNewsfeedus... @kalwradio.bsky.social @kalxberkeley.bsky.social @thrillist.bsky.social @onlyinsf.bsky.social @wicemgindrey.bsky.social @cagovernornewsom.bsky.social @governor.ca.gov @agrobbonta.oag.ca.gov @indybay.org
0
0
0
0
California Attorney General Says He’s Considering a New Way to Stop Trump’s Hollywood Tariff ...
www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/politics-news/calif...
#News #Politics #News #donald #trump #Rob #Bonta #tariffs
Result Details
0
0
0
0
#Bonta Challenges #Trump & #DOGE on Privacy & Buyout Plan: www.facebook.com/SFNewsfeedus... @cagov.bsky.social @wicemgindrey.bsky.social @gindreywicem.bsky.social @kalwradio.bsky.social @kalxberkeley.bsky.social @indybay.org @sfgov.sf.gov @afscme.bsky.social @sfgovtv.sf.gov @sfgov.bsky.social
2
1
0
0
First Choice v. Platkin (24-781 @3rdCir): Whether #FirstAmendment investigatory subpoena creates jurisdictional ripeness barrier when state demands donor names from faith-based center. Challenges #Bonta precedent on associational privacy. https://tinyurl.com/2advmg8o
0
0
1
0
First Choice v. Platkin (24-781 @3rdCir): Whether #FirstAmendment investigatory subpoena creates jurisdictional ripeness barrier when state court hasn't fully adjudicated constitutional claims. Challenges #Bonta precedent on donor privacy. https://tinyurl.com/2advmg8o
0
0
1
0
More need to read this @lataco.bsky.social article about #AttorneyGeneral #Bonta
“…nearly two years later, not a single person has been exonerated or resentenced through the AG’s Post Conviction Justice Unit (PCJU). In fact, the unit hasn’t even started accepting applications.”
#PostConviction
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0