Advertisement · 728 × 90
#
Hashtag
#Contreversy
Advertisement · 728 × 90
Post image

Raconte moi la fois où quelqu’un de ton entourage a été serpent avec toi 🐍

Cindy Cinnamon Photographie
www.CindyCinnamon.com
Fujifilm X-T50
Sigma 100-400mm
ISO 2000 - 600mm - F6,3 - 1/1000

#Photo #XT50 #Sigma #Nature #WildLife #Snake #Couleuve #Serpent #Reptile #Contreversy #Quebec #Canada

5 1 0 0
Preview
a man wearing headphones and glasses has a smiley face on his face ALT: a man wearing headphones and glasses has a smiley face on his face

youtu.be/VY7N8Cg-ow4?...

#royaltyishere #internetanarchist #contreversy

I haven't seen #zestyjesus face in a while, I thought he was #jerma

Might be the eyes and jaw, and when his hair is short.

0 0 1 0
Preview
a woman in a red shirt is making a funny face and saying `` sure , jan '' . ALT: a woman in a red shirt is making a funny face and saying `` sure , jan '' .

youtube.com/shorts/txKNe...

tbh, only thing you should reply to Peta posts (besides polite stuff like "I disagree, have a nice day") is stuff like this gif;

#umamusume #peta #contreversy #larrywasnotthere

0 0 0 0

I forgot the tags

#grokai #grok #elonmust #twitter #x #contreversy

0 0 0 0

Microsoft: Don't say "AI Slop"

Me: I'm more used to call it "AI BS" tbh, is it good for y'all at the office?

#microsoft #genai #meme #slop #contreversy

0 0 0 0
the crunchyroll monopoly
the crunchyroll monopoly YouTube video by Doron’s World

youtube.com/shorts/wxP3N...

Be angrier

Be more pissed off

We must do it for free access

#crunchyroll #contreversy #freewithads

0 0 0 0
He is always talking about the actual language in it. That it's an "initiative", that is, a suggestion but badly/vaguely worded. He talks about outside licenses. And he talks about how government, even the progressive EU, tried, is trying, or made laws that completely disregard how what they govern works. He looks at what Ross actually says and regards his actual points. In addition to being vague, when you're addressing ignorant lawmakers, you really need to be specific, but while you need to consider they might be ignorant, they are not dumb and you should not talk down to them, which Ross does.
He supports the idea and makes a lot points the initiative should be specific about. He talks about his deep experience in live service games, and his hatred for some of them, something I haven't seen anyone else talk about. I also didn't see anyone address the possibility for abuse that he presents.
My own point: while Ross and his defenders said that it should have been an easy shoe in to law but also that it's obviously a suggestion and when it gets into government consideration, it'll be under meticulous scrutiny before it's law, a contradiction I didn't see addressed. I disagree with Thor on that even live service or server-based games should be preserved in some capacity even if you can't recreate the original experience. But this should be with some caveats -- like being public after a certain amount of time, maybe after the "copyright" for it expires -- and under specific organizations like a museum or a Library of Congress type thing.
In the end, he's all about game preservation and he's in favor of player communities but only attacking the language the initiative is written in.
I come from Thor's camp but I did try to look at it critically, as if I'm in Ross' side and try to find holes in Thor's arguments, but please, spear me for anything I missed or got wrong, with references, of course.

He is always talking about the actual language in it. That it's an "initiative", that is, a suggestion but badly/vaguely worded. He talks about outside licenses. And he talks about how government, even the progressive EU, tried, is trying, or made laws that completely disregard how what they govern works. He looks at what Ross actually says and regards his actual points. In addition to being vague, when you're addressing ignorant lawmakers, you really need to be specific, but while you need to consider they might be ignorant, they are not dumb and you should not talk down to them, which Ross does. He supports the idea and makes a lot points the initiative should be specific about. He talks about his deep experience in live service games, and his hatred for some of them, something I haven't seen anyone else talk about. I also didn't see anyone address the possibility for abuse that he presents. My own point: while Ross and his defenders said that it should have been an easy shoe in to law but also that it's obviously a suggestion and when it gets into government consideration, it'll be under meticulous scrutiny before it's law, a contradiction I didn't see addressed. I disagree with Thor on that even live service or server-based games should be preserved in some capacity even if you can't recreate the original experience. But this should be with some caveats -- like being public after a certain amount of time, maybe after the "copyright" for it expires -- and under specific organizations like a museum or a Library of Congress type thing. In the end, he's all about game preservation and he's in favor of player communities but only attacking the language the initiative is written in. I come from Thor's camp but I did try to look at it critically, as if I'm in Ross' side and try to find holes in Thor's arguments, but please, spear me for anything I missed or got wrong, with references, of course.

Post image Post image

After reading through this and watching the videos, I don't think he misunderstood it or misrepresented it.
#ContinuedInAltText
#StopKillingGames #Contreversy

0 0 0 0
Pr0n stars to demo against .xxx What do we want? When do we want it...

Pr0n stars to demo against .xxx#Icann #gtld #contreversy

reg.cx/1N8d

0 0 0 0