#DonaldTrump #TrumpWantsToStopMail-InVoting #TrumpVotesByMail #Disenfranchisement #GOP #USCourts #FormerMaricopaCountyAZRecorderStephenRicher #PASecretaryOfCommonwealthAlSchmidt
Politico:
www.politico.com/news/2026/04...
tRump just signed an EO to make a "nationwide qualified voter" list. Talk about disenfranchisement!!!
#voter #disenfranchisement #qualifiedvoterlist #trumpexecutiveorder
youtube.com/watch?v=hMkmvB1i_-Y&pp=wgIGCgQQAhgB0gcJCREBmk6bhtou
JUST SAY NO TO “THE SAVE TRUMPS A**” voter elimination and #disenfranchisement act!!!
#Disenfranchisement #SeizingBallots #GubernatorialCandidate #GOP #SowingElectionDoubt #RiversideCountySheriffChadBianco #JudgeJayKiel #RiversideCounty #California
Riverside County, CA Sheriff Chad Bianco, GOP candidate for Gov., seizes 600,000+ ballots:
calmatters.org/politics/202...
3 diff orgs examined the financial impacts of legislation requiring documentary proof of citizenship in Arizona & Kansas found that in addition to blocking eligible voters from the rolls, the SAFE Act had most likely cost Kansas’ government as much as $353,000.
#Disenfranchisement #AmericanGrifters
A Voter-Suppression Audit of The SAVE (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility) Act Researched and written by andy J.S. Decepida Framing the Question The cleanest way to evaluate the SAVE Act is not to begin with partisan outrage, even if outrage is warranted. It is to ask a simpler question: does the bill solve a real problem in a proportionate way, or does it impose broad new burdens on lawful voters in the name of a problem that is already rare and already illegal? The strongest evidence points to the second conclusion.1,2,11‑14 The SAVE Act family of bills, culminating in the 2026 House-passed SAVE America Act, does far more than require proof of citizenship. It redesigns federal voter registration into a document-dependent, in-person, high-liability system. It requires documentary proof of citizenship to register, pushes mail registration into an in-person document-delivery process, requires states to run voter rolls through the federal SAVE database to identify and remove suspected noncitizens, exposes election officials to private lawsuits and criminal penalties, and, in the 2026 version, adds a national photo-ID rule for voting, including vote-by-mail, while explicitly excluding student IDs.1,2 That structure matters. A bill can be formally neutral and still be functionally suppressive. If lawmakers choose administrative mechanisms that are known to fall hardest on younger voters, poorer voters, movers, rural voters, Native voters, naturalized citizens, and voters whose names or records do not line up neatly across government files, then the law’s foreseeable effect is disenfranchisement, whether or not the bill says so out loud.1,8,10,16,25,26
The fairest progressive case against the SAVE Act is therefore not that Republicans have confessed, in so many words, to wanting fewer Democratic votes. The stronger case is that they have chosen a policy design whose burdens are broad, predictable, and unnecessary, even after years of evidence showing that documentary-proof-of-citizenship regimes block eligible citizens at scale while addressing only a vanishingly small amount of actual unlawful voting.10‑13,15 What the Bill Actually Does The core architecture of the SAVE Act has three parts: First, it moves citizenship verification to the front end of registration. Under the bill, registering to vote in federal elections would require documentary proof of United States citizenship, not merely an attestation under penalty of perjury on the federal form. Acceptable documentation can include a passport, certain citizenship or naturalisation records, or specified combinations of photo identification and birth records. The 2026 House-passed version also requires applicants using the national mail registration form to present that proof in person to election officials by the registration deadline. In same-day registration states, that means the proof must be produced at the polling place.1,2 Second, it creates a back-end programme of mass database checking. The 2026 bill requires states to use the Department of Homeland Security’s SAVE database to identify registrants thought to be noncitizens and then to remove them through a notice-and-proof process. In other words, the bill is not only about registration. It is also about purges, database matching, and ongoing eligibility surveillance.1,2
Third, it adds punitive enforcement. The bill expands the private right of action under federal voter-registration law and adds criminal penalties that can apply to election officials who register applicants lacking the required documentary proof. This is not a decorative add-on. It predictably pushes administrators toward defensive denial, because the personal and institutional cost of wrongly approving a registration becomes much higher than the cost of wrongly rejecting or delaying one.1,29 The 2026 version then goes further still. It creates a federal photo-ID requirement for in-person voting, allows only narrow provisional-ballot cures for voters who arrive without the required ID, requires mail voters to include either an ID copy or the last four digits of a Social Security number plus an affidavit, and explicitly bars student IDs from the category of acceptable IDs that states may designate. That is not a modest tightening of existing practice. It is a national expansion of both registration burdens and ballot-casting burdens.1 Why the Stated Problem Does Not Justify the Remedy Supporters of the bill say it is needed because noncitizens may register and vote under the existing federal form and because the National Voter Registration Act prevents states from demanding documentary proof at the point of registration. The legal background is real enough. The Supreme Court’s decision in Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council held that states must accept and use the federal form even if it does not require documentary proof of citizenship, and supporters of the SAVE Act plainly want Congress to rewrite that federal baseline.2,7
But that still leaves the core policy question untouched: how big is the underlying problem? The best evidence says it is vanishingly small. Noncitizen voting in federal elections is already illegal. Noncitizen registration and voting claims have been investigated repeatedly by election officials, policy groups, and researchers, and the consistent finding is not that such conduct never occurs, but that it is extremely rare. The Bipartisan Policy Center, the Migration Policy Institute, the Brennan Center, the Centre for Election Innovation and Research, and even libertarian critics of Trump-era fraud claims have all converged on the same bottom line: the scale of documented noncitizen voting is tiny relative to the electorate, and sensational claims routinely collapse under scrutiny.12‑14,30 That matters because the SAVE Act does not target a narrow, high-risk subset of registrations. It imposes a universal front-end proof burden on the entire electorate. When the verified problem is rare, but the remedy is broad, costly, and exclusion-prone, the burden of justification gets much heavier. The drafters of the bill have not met that burden.10‑13 Kansas supplies the clearest real-world warning. Its documentary-proof-of-citizenship regime did not reveal a hidden mass of unlawful voting. Instead, it blocked or suspended tens of thousands of eligible citizens. Nonpartisan summaries have put the figure around 31,000 would-be registrants; litigation-era expert analysis found more than 35,000 affected registrations between 2013 and 2016, with especially heavy effects on younger and unaffiliated voters. That is the wrong ratio by any serious democratic standard: a massive burden on lawful citizens to address a minuscule amount of unlawful activity.10,11,15
{𝗮𝙅𝙎𝘿} 🚨🗳️🔥 #GOP are not just trying to tilt the electoral field for the GOP. The SAVE Act weaponizes paperwork, cost, and bureaucracy against younger, lower-income, Native, naturalized, trans, and name-changed voters already pushed to the margins.
#SAVEAct #Disenfranchisement #VoteSuppression ⤵
#disenfranchisement #VRA #votingRights #voterID #constitutionalDemocracyWithoutEither
#tyranny #plutocracy #feudalism [5/5]
#GOP #Midterms Strategy: Steal The Vote youtu.be/k4-1lIt75F8?... #VotingQueues #Postmarks #ElectionScheming #MAGA #Project2026 #USPSFunding #Disenfranchisement #VotingRights
It's a list of key negatives of the "SAVE" act.
#NoSaveAct #NOKINGS #disenfranchisement #discrimination #UnitedStates
Exactly. #Disenfranchisement #AlwaysTimeForWar #GotPapers?
Voter fraud is so rare that Donald Trump has been convicted of more felonies than the total number of confirmed cases of illegal voting in U.S. federal elections in the last 20 years.
#elections #voting #fraud #lies #SAVEact #disenfranchisement
But also young voters, nonwhite voters, female voters, voters born abroad, etc. Because the Roberts Court already disemboweled the Voting Rights Act, and because they can.
#VRA #votingRights #faceAct #disenfranchisement #plutocracy [2/3]
The reason Mike Johnson cannot name a single fraud case the SAVE act would stop is because the SAVE act is not a bill to stop voter fraud it's a bill to suppress the vote.
#politics #voting #SAVEact #fraud #rights #disenfranchisement
Thanks to @catsandbuds.bsky.social
#SAVEAct #Disenfranchisement
#34CountFelon
Congress is moving the SAVE Act suite of bills, which would disenfranchise millions of eligible Americans from registering to vote. #SaveAct #VoterID #Disenfranchisement
What is the SAVE America Act? 19thnews.org/2026/03/save...
The official vote to end any possibility of bringing democracy to the US is about to occur.
#voterSuppression #disenfranchisement #voteElimination
“SAVE America Act” agenda, has drawn support from advocates of tighter eligibility verification, as well as criticism from Democrats, voting access groups and policy analysts who warn about administrative burdens and potential #disenfranchisement OF THE POOR WHO CAN'T AFFORD IDs OR PASSPORTS TO VOTE
Requiring money to be paid in order to vote is illegal. It's called a poll tax. Specifically barred by our laws and constitution. @scotusblog.com
#scotus
@scotusplaces.bsky.social
#polltax
#saveact
#voting
#disenfranchisement
#gotv
The Republicans' latest bill to disenfranchise voters has already been confirmed dead by the Senate, but the fact that they even thought to propose it says a lot about their confidence in their chances this November.
Source
#SaveAct #Disenfranchisement #Midterms #Repubs #Filibuster
Just found out that even with a driver's license, you can't register to vote if you don't have a passport, and almost half of Americans don't even have one. Mind blown!
Credit: @briantylercohen.bsky.social | Source
#VotingRights #IDRequirements #ElectionReform #Disenfranchisement
The history behind Montana senator's mysterious scheme
MAGA getting exactly what they voted for... now they can't vote. Just accept what pedo Daddy has selected for you. We tried to warn you.
#corruption #disenfranchisement #Montana #undemocratic #Alme #Daines #Gianforte
www.alternet.org/daines/
I’ve been researching this for almost a year. They’ve been planning this for almost 50. We can’t just wait and see. We are out of time.
#votersrights #texas #voterrollpurge #eagleai #disenfranchisement
After the primary yesterday, I was chatting with the lady I worked with (outside, election nerds). She said if the SAVE act passes, she will need:
-Birth certificate
-Marriage cert #1
-Death cert of her first husband -Marriage cert #2 with her new husband
-Re-register to vote
#Disenfranchisement
"If my mind can conceive it, if my heart can believe it, I know I can achieve it because I am somebody!"
--
People say Jesse was too much about himself. No comparisons with the one that's true about. #Jesse's background was #disenfranchisement all the way into the home. Ignored by his #father,...
#DonaldTrump #l#KristiNoem #VotingRights #Disenfranchisement #MidTermElections #2026Elections
The Hill:
"Noem boasts of Trump administration ensuring 'we have the right people voting' ahead of midterms:
thehill.com/homenews/cam...
#potus #american #liberals
It's TIME TO TAKE THEM ALL OUT.
Vance pushed legislation thru to require us citizens to have US PASSPORTS TO VOTE!
#Disenfranchisement 100%
For the #GOPChrimeSyndicate as run by #GOPCriminals it is all about #Disenfranchisement
And in this round, they are targeting Women. Because women are much much less likely to vote for #GOPCriminals
Pure voter Disenfranchisement. Women, this time are the target.
Vote out scurrilous #SAVE Act
H.R. 22: SAVE Act
April 10, 2025 at 11:21 a.m.
#voting #midterms #SaveAmericaAct #disenfranchisement
"To amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes."
THUMP &《GHOULSofROME》controllers are gonna try DISENFRANCHISE Nghz
…using mind-games & word-trapps
ーdon't play their game
#THUMP has no mandate; he's unelected
they hijacked the original #AfroIndigenos government in 1776
#Disenfranchisement
youtu.be/ytluKYE_3h0?...
