Advertisement · 728 × 90
#
Hashtag
#EcoFascists
Advertisement · 728 × 90
We’re hearing about a whole range of ecological measures.

We need to buy eco-friendly cleaning products, insulate our homes, change our boilers and have a Canadian well, buy less plastic, sort our waste, drive eco-friendly cars, limit our speed on the roads, do not fly, limit our water consumption when we shower or flush the toilet, limit your consumption of concrete, have a compost in our garden, limit our consumption of meat, use Aleppo soap and limit our consumption of sun creams, use a solar oven, invest in ecological energy (wind turbines, photovoltaic panels, etc.), buy second-hand. Electricity, oil and food prices are rising under the pretext of ecology.

Mining, lithium extraction, nuclear power plant waste, large factories, construction, petroleum, intensive agriculture (soil pollution, exorbitant water consumption) and so on. Multinationals pollute far more than private individuals, and are not subject to any ecological measures to limit their pollution. The world’s richest people, especially via multinationals, are responsible for the world’s biggest ecocides: they destroy forests such as the Amazon rainforest, pollute rivers, destroy the seabed, impose conditions on farmers such that they destroy the land, which is in danger of becoming sterile due to the use of chemicals, and mistreat animals. What’s more, chemicals such as pesticides are causing the extinction of entire animal species. They should be judged internationally, not according to the laws they decide at national level in each country.

“The poorest half of the global population accounts for only 3% of carbon emissions associated with private capital ownership, while the top 10% account for 77% of emissions. The wealthiest 1% alone account for 41% of private capital ownership emissions, almost double the amount of the entire bottom 90% combined”.

Highlights from the World Inequality Report 2026 (WIR 2026) – World inequality report: https://wir2026.wid.world/insight/executive-summary/ 

The …

We’re hearing about a whole range of ecological measures. We need to buy eco-friendly cleaning products, insulate our homes, change our boilers and have a Canadian well, buy less plastic, sort our waste, drive eco-friendly cars, limit our speed on the roads, do not fly, limit our water consumption when we shower or flush the toilet, limit your consumption of concrete, have a compost in our garden, limit our consumption of meat, use Aleppo soap and limit our consumption of sun creams, use a solar oven, invest in ecological energy (wind turbines, photovoltaic panels, etc.), buy second-hand. Electricity, oil and food prices are rising under the pretext of ecology. Mining, lithium extraction, nuclear power plant waste, large factories, construction, petroleum, intensive agriculture (soil pollution, exorbitant water consumption) and so on. Multinationals pollute far more than private individuals, and are not subject to any ecological measures to limit their pollution. The world’s richest people, especially via multinationals, are responsible for the world’s biggest ecocides: they destroy forests such as the Amazon rainforest, pollute rivers, destroy the seabed, impose conditions on farmers such that they destroy the land, which is in danger of becoming sterile due to the use of chemicals, and mistreat animals. What’s more, chemicals such as pesticides are causing the extinction of entire animal species. They should be judged internationally, not according to the laws they decide at national level in each country. “The poorest half of the global population accounts for only 3% of carbon emissions associated with private capital ownership, while the top 10% account for 77% of emissions. The wealthiest 1% alone account for 41% of private capital ownership emissions, almost double the amount of the entire bottom 90% combined”. Highlights from the World Inequality Report 2026 (WIR 2026) – World inequality report: https://wir2026.wid.world/insight/executive-summary/ The …

Useful Ecology: www.aurianneor.org/useful-ecolo...

#air #climatechange #developedcountries #developingcountries #development #developmentaid #ecofascists #ecology #ecosystems #ecoterrorism #factories #fossilfuels #invest #multinationals #ozone #pollution #rich #taxes #unbreathable

1 0 0 0
Terrorism is the use of terror for ideological, political or religious ends. The word “terrorisme” was first used in November 1794, when it was used to describe the “doctrine of the partisans of the Terror”, those who, some time earlier, had exercised power by waging an intense and violent struggle against the counter-revolutionaries. It was a way of exercising power, not a means of acting against it. The word evolved during the 19th century to mean action against the state rather than action by it

Terrorism – Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism


Terrorism therefore stems from action by the State against its own people. Eco-terrorists are defined as “threats, intimidation and acts of violence against property or persons (civilians, police or military) committed in the name of ecologism”.

Eco-terrorism – Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eco-terrorism


But doesn’t terrorism come from those in power who use the police and the army against the people who follow the advice of scientists to avoid the deaths and migrations linked to global warming? This is illegitimate violence. Instead of sending the police and army against people who take action to promote ecology, it would be better to suggest a referendum so that the people can make their voices heard.


These people in power could have acted in the 1990s to prevent the current disasters and can still act to prevent them in the future. This inaction in the face of global warming and despite the warnings of the scientific community is a form of terrorism that is amplified when these people use the police and the army against desperate environmental activists to make their voices heard. In effect, the people are allowed to elect but not to decide. Instead, our leaders encourage pollution. The Légion d’honneur for Total’s boss, the difficulty for farmers and fishermen to convert to organic farming in the face of a system that only allows them to survive by polluting, and so on.


Rather than att…

Terrorism is the use of terror for ideological, political or religious ends. The word “terrorisme” was first used in November 1794, when it was used to describe the “doctrine of the partisans of the Terror”, those who, some time earlier, had exercised power by waging an intense and violent struggle against the counter-revolutionaries. It was a way of exercising power, not a means of acting against it. The word evolved during the 19th century to mean action against the state rather than action by it Terrorism – Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism Terrorism therefore stems from action by the State against its own people. Eco-terrorists are defined as “threats, intimidation and acts of violence against property or persons (civilians, police or military) committed in the name of ecologism”. Eco-terrorism – Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eco-terrorism But doesn’t terrorism come from those in power who use the police and the army against the people who follow the advice of scientists to avoid the deaths and migrations linked to global warming? This is illegitimate violence. Instead of sending the police and army against people who take action to promote ecology, it would be better to suggest a referendum so that the people can make their voices heard. These people in power could have acted in the 1990s to prevent the current disasters and can still act to prevent them in the future. This inaction in the face of global warming and despite the warnings of the scientific community is a form of terrorism that is amplified when these people use the police and the army against desperate environmental activists to make their voices heard. In effect, the people are allowed to elect but not to decide. Instead, our leaders encourage pollution. The Légion d’honneur for Total’s boss, the difficulty for farmers and fishermen to convert to organic farming in the face of a system that only allows them to survive by polluting, and so on. Rather than att…

Ecoterrorism: www.aurianneor.org/ecoterrorism/

#aurianneor #climatechange, #democracy, #ecofascists, #ecologists #ecology, #ecoterrorism, #green, #immigration, #oligarchy, #organic #organicfarming, #police, #politics, #pollution, #power, #purchasingpower, #scientists, #terrorism, #violence, #wealth

3 0 0 0
Preview
(Instructional Video / Right Wing Extremism) Eco-Fascists Share Stochastic Video Explaining How to Detonate a Humidifier in a Crowded Building (Using Children's Sesame Street's Big Bird)- 18 December ... (Instructional Video) Eco-Fascists Share Stochastic Video Explaining How to Detonate a Humidifier in a Crowded Building

#EcoFascists Share #Stochastic #ideo Explaining How to #Detonate a #Humidifier in a Crowded Building #Racist #Propaganda
Read more: trackingterrorism.org/chatter/how-...

0 0 0 0