Tell Whole Foods to Label for GMO Ingredients in Products, as It Had Planned - Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog (Beyond Pesticides, July 23, 2018) Whole Foods Quietly Put Its Comprehensive GMO Labeling Policy on Hold. As USDA’s proposal to use smiley face labels for genetically engineered (GE) foods or genetically engineered organisms (GMOs) nears implementation, it is more essential than ever that retailers step up to identify genetically engineered foods in their stores. Five years ago, Whole Foods Market announced a plan to label food with GE ingredients sold in its stores. Whole Foods’ plan requires a label for all GE food sold in its stores by the end of 2018, noting that the move was made in response to customers’ increased demand for labeled products. “Some of our manufacturers say they’ve seen a 15 percent increase in sales of products they have labeled [as non–GMO],” explains A.C. Gallo, Whole Foods president and chief operating officer. The chain’s labeling requirements include all of its North American stores, as its European supermarkets already require this label. Consumers Reports found that 92% of people surveyed (2014) want their food labeled for ingredients that are genetically engineered. Tell Whole Foods and Owner Amazon to Get Back on Track in Labeling GMOs. In an email to suppliers on May 18, 2018, Whole Foods’ […]

Tell Whole Foods to Label for GMO Ingredients in Products, as It Had Planned#wholefoods #labelgmos

bit.ly/2LDS7wO

Tell @WhiteHouse @POTUS to honor his '08 campaign pledge to #labelGMOs - VETO the #DARKAct! via @CFSTrueFood

Senate Blocks Vote on Bill To Stop GE Labeling - Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog (Beyond Pesticides, March 17, 2016)  Yesterday,  the U.S. Senate  voted to block a vote  on a food labeling bill that would eliminate consumers’ right to know whether genetically engineered (GE) ingredients are in the food they purchase. Senate Amendment  3450,  National Voluntary Bioengineered Food Labeling Standard, proposed by Senator Pat Roberts (R-KS), failed to garner the  60 votes necessary for cloture, which would have ended the debate and allowed a vote on the bill. The  vote of 48-49 effectively killed the Senate bill. The amendment is the Senate version of H.R. 1599, Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act, sponsored by  Representative Mike Pompeo (R-KS).  Opponents have dubbed the legislation the Deny Americans the Right to Know Act (DARK Act). The bill passed the House in July, 2015 on  a  vote of 275-150. In addition to  preempting the ability of all  states to impose mandatory labeling standards, the bill imposes a weak voluntary federal scheme in its place. Backed largely by House Republicans, the DARK Act makes it harder for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to require mandatory national labeling of products containing GE ingredients, and safeguard current policies that allow companies to voluntarily decide whether to label foods containing […]

Senate Blocks Vote on Bill To Stop GE Labeling#DARKAct #GMO #Pesticides #Health #LabelGMOs

bit.ly/1TQPGbj

Tell Hillary to Dump Monsanto's Money and Support Mandatory GMO Labeling!@food_democracy Pls RT #labelGMOs

bit.ly/1nyBF4g

tell Congress to stop the Ultimate Monsanto Protection Act, act today! http://bit.ly/1vOsRs6 @food_democracy Pls RT #labelGMOs

General Mills to Drop Genetically Engineered Ingredients in Original Cheerios - Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog (Beyond Pesticides, January 8, 2014) Last week, General Mills announced that the company will  eliminate genetically engineered (GE) ingredients from its mainstay original cereal Cheerios. The action  recognizes  the overwhelming consumer demand for GE-free products. The move was met with  a range of  reactions in the environmental community, from cheers of  victory for the GE-free movement to calls for broader action affecting General Mills’ product line, right-to-know labeling of all foods produced with GE ingredients, and compensation of farmers by patent holders of genetically engineered material that contaminates their crops.  The General Mills’ announcement does not apply to all of its Cheerio products, or its other products. “Did we change Cheerios? No. Not really,” says a blog post by Tom Forsythe, vice president of Global Communications for General Mills. “Why change anything at all? It’s simple. We did it because we think consumers may embrace it,” he continues. Some in the environmental community assert that this change is an attempt by the company to revive its image after spending millions of dollars to defeat state-level labeling initiatives in California in 2012, and Washington State in 2013. The ”˜new’ Cheerios will contain the label “Not Made with Genetically Modified Ingredients.”  General […]

General Mills to Drop Genetically Engineered Ingredients in Original #Cheerios#gmo #labelgmos

bit.ly/1dfF8xw

✍ Stop TAFTA and the TPP: the Monsanto Protection Act on steroids! http://bit.ly/15RfOrs Pls RT #LabelGMOs #StopTPP (via @food_democracy)

Corporate Assault Targets California Voters in Attempt to Stop GE Labeling Proposition - Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog (Beyond Pesticides, October 15, 2012) California’s Proposition 37, which would require mandatory labeling on genetically engineered (GE) foods, is facing a strong challenge as tens of millions of conventional food industry dollars have poured into television advertisements before the November 6th election. Poll results released Thursday by the Pepperdine University School of Public Policy and the California Business Roundtable show that 48.3% of respondents would vote yes for the measure on Nov. 6, while 40.2% would vote no. Prop 37 was authored by James Wheaton, president of the Environmental Law Foundation. Earlier this year, the California Right to Know campaign gathered 971,126 petition signatures for Prop 37, nearly double the 555,236 signatures required to qualify for inclusion on the ballot. As it currently stands, over 40 countries around the world, including all of Europe, Japan, and China have the right to know whether they are eating GE food. While opponents of the initiative are attempting to mislead the public about the costs of the proposition, an economic assessment from Joanna M. Shepherd-Bailey, Ph.D. of Emory University School of Law reveals that the initiative would not result in any additional expense to the taxpayers of California; Prop 37 is self-enforced and […]

#Corporate Assault Targets #California Voters in Attempt to Stop #GMO #Labeling Proposition#YesonProp37 #LabelGMOs

bit.ly/SXZv2b