@TheHeartoftheTARDIS #NotAllHumans
0
0
0
0
Hashtag
#NotAllHumans
Advertisement · 728 × 90
0
0
0
0
My patience for people who interject themselves into a clearly defined post for the attempt of using a #NotAllWomen, #NotAllMen, #NotAllHumans, perspective…y’all…
Not everything is meant for you.
4
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
7
1
0
0
#notallhumans at least, there are enough of us masking that magneto can’t get a full pass… for now.
1
0
1
0
I haven't been able to watch nature documentaries for decades, because of the sense of foreboding, of inevitable cataclysm, caused by our species' behaviour. (I know, #NotAllHumans).
I feed the moorhens, ducks, geese, swans, sparrows, bluetits etc along the canal. That's all my heart can cope with.
5
0
0
0
#NotAllHumans lol
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
Ongoing over-exploitation and delayed responses to environmental change highlight the urgency for action to promote vertebrate recoveries by 2030 Richard Cornford1,2,3,† , Fiona Spooner4 , Louise McRae1 , Andy Purvis2 and Robin Freeman1 To safeguard nature, we must understand the drivers of biodiversity loss. Time-delayed biodiversity responses to environmental changes (ecological lags) are often absent from models of biodiversity change, despite their welldocumented existence. We quantify how lagged responses to climate and land-use change have influenced mammal and bird populations around the world, while incorporating effects of direct exploitation and conservation interventions. Ecological lag duration varies between drivers, vertebrate classes and body size groupings—e.g. lags linked to climate-change impacts are 13 years for small birds, rising to 40 years for larger species. Past warming and land conversion generally combine to predict population declines; however, such conditions are associated with population increases for small mammals. Positive effects of management (>+4% annually for large mammals) and protected areas (>+6% annually for large birds) on population trends contrast with the negative impact of exploitation (<−7% annually for birds), highlighting the need to promote sustainable use. Model projections suggest a future with winners (e.g. large birds) and losers (e.g. medium-sized birds), with current/recent environmental change substantially influencing abundance trends to 2050. Without urgent action, including effective conservation interventions and promoting sustainable use, ambitious targets to stop declines by 2030 may already be slipping out of reach
We*. Have. Destroyed. Everything.
"Ongoing over-exploitation and delayed responses to environmental change highlight the urgency for action to promote vertebrate recoveries by 2030"
royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1...
#NotAllHumans, obvs. But enough, with enough by-standers.
4
2
1
0
Unfortunately humans do a lot of Wack Shit that I no longer want to be associated with
#notallhumans
1
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
I'm completely disgusted with humanity on like 20 different levels right now, #notallhumans and #notmosthumans but #waytoomanyhumans
68
9
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
B12 et vendredi à toustes ! Me demande combien de personnes non-humaines ont péri dans l'Aude à cause de la bêtise humaine (oui, #NotAllHumans, mais beaucoup quand même.)
0
0
0
0
Tulsi and this whole presser is literally (and possibly quite dangerously) pressing the bounds of reality.
#BlackHoleComith #AliensHELPUSNOW
#NotAllHumans
1
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
People want the benefits, but not the work. They want the rewards, but not the risks. We’re a lazy, selfish, suicidal animal.
But of course #notallhumans
1
0
0
0
no exactly bc thats crazy like how are yall going to make me watch someone get tortured and go #notallhumans nuts!!
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0