✨ #PeerReviewWeek2025 highlights the future of peer review in the AI era.

At SynOpen Journal, we recognize the potential of AI to assist reviewers and strengthen integrity, but also the need for transparency, safeguards, and a continued focus on human expertise.

#AI #PeerReview #OpenAccess #Thieme

How is AI reshaping peer review? 🧠

At Synlett Journal, #PeerReviewWeek2025 is a chance to reflect on the opportunities AI offers, such as efficiency and support, while addressing questions of bias, transparency, and the role of human judgment.

#AI #PeerReview #Thieme

💻 AI is changing research - and peer review is no exception.

At Synthesis Journal, we mark #PeerReviewWeek2025 by reflecting on both the opportunities (efficiency, support, integrity) and the challenges (bias, transparency, safeguards) that AI brings to peer review.

#AI #PeerReview #Thieme

Peer review: The good, the bad and the ugly (Achilleas Kostoulas) This blogpost by Dr Achilleas Kostoulas discusses some challenges of the peer review process, and what can be learned from them.

Having published modestly and reviewed a lot, here’s what I know about peer review. #PeerReviewWeek2025

achilleaskostoulas.com/2018/05/01/p...

AI can be beneficial for training reviewers.

“AI can be beneficial for training reviewers.” — Adachi Shun
Expert insight matters most. Learn more: spkl.io/63322Autly #PeerReviewWeek2025

AI can be beneficial for training reviewers.

“AI can be beneficial for training reviewers.” — Adachi Shun
Expert insight matters most. Learn more: spkl.io/63321AutlH #PeerReviewWeek2025

AI can be beneficial for training reviewers.

“AI can be beneficial for training reviewers.” — Adachi Shun
Expert insight matters most. Learn more: spkl.io/63323AutlJ #PeerReviewWeek2025

AI can be beneficial for training reviewers.

“AI can be beneficial for training reviewers.” — Adachi Shun
Expert insight matters most. Learn more: spkl.io/63325Autlz #PeerReviewWeek2025

Black graphic with Elsevier logo and "Researcher Voices" text. A quote on AI reliance highlights human judgment in publishing. Photo of Dr. Elisa De Ranieri, Editor-in-Chief.

Quote on peer-review by Dr. Sarang Mahajan, scientific editor of Acta Psychologica. Includes Elsevier logo, geometric pattern, and author's photo.

AI can assist peer review, but it can’t replace human judgment on novelty, complexity, or ethics. Editors provide the insight and context AI can’t.
Peer review should evolve with AI as a tool — not a substitute.

🔗 spkl.io/63328ARapr

#PeerReviewWeek2025

Human judgment is essential for evaluating study designs and ethical considerations associated with research. AI can serve as a peer-review assistant rather than a reviewer itself.

Human judgment is key for assessing research complexity, novelty, and ethics. While AI can assist in the peer review process, it cannot replace expert reviewers. Learn more: spkl.io/63327AutdW #PeerReviewWeek2025

Human judgment is essential for evaluating study designs and ethical considerations associated with research. AI can serve as a peer-review assistant rather than a reviewer itself.

Human judgment is key for assessing research complexity, novelty, and ethics. While AI can assist in the peer review process, it cannot replace expert reviewers. Learn more: spkl.io/63328Autdo #PeerReviewWeek2025

Human judgment is essential for evaluating study designs and ethical considerations associated with research. AI can serve as a peer-review assistant rather than a reviewer itself.

Human judgment is key for assessing research complexity, novelty, and ethics. While AI can assist in the peer review process, it cannot replace expert reviewers. Learn more: spkl.io/63323Autdc #PeerReviewWeek2025

Human judgment is essential for evaluating study designs and ethical considerations associated with research. AI can serve as a peer-review assistant rather than a reviewer itself.

Human judgment is key for assessing research complexity, novelty, and ethics. While AI can assist in the peer review process, it cannot replace expert reviewers. Learn more: spkl.io/63322Autdi #PeerReviewWeek2025

En la #PeerReviewWeek2025 se destaca un lema crucial: “Rethinking Peer Review in the AI Era”. Un llamado urgente para revisar cómo la IA está transformando los procesos de evaluación académica.

📢 For #PeerReviewWeek2025, we ran a global survey on AI use from our reviewer community.

Laura Feetham-Walker, Peer Review Engagement Manager at IOPP, shared the insights with InPublishing, answering key questions.

🔗Read the article: www.inpublishing.co.uk/articles/ai-...

Ask the Chefs: What’s a Bold Experiment with AI in Peer Review You’d Like to See Tested? - The Scholarly Kitchen To kick off Peer Review Week, we asked the Chefs, What’s a bold experiment with AI in peer review you’d like to see tested?

5 experts answering 1 question: What’s a bold experiment with AI in peer review you’d like to see tested?
Read full article by @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social 🔗： scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2025/09/15/a...
@irfanullah.bsky.social @alicemeadows.bsky.social #PeerReviewWeek2025

[1/5]
Happy #PeerReviewWeek2025! ✨

🌐 This global annual celebration highlights the critical role peer review plays in maintaining the quality and integrity of research.

Ask the Chefs: What’s a Bold Experiment with AI in Peer Review You’d Like to See Tested? - The Scholarly Kitchen To kick off Peer Review Week, we asked the Chefs, What’s a bold experiment with AI in peer review you’d like to see tested?

Welcome to #PeerReviewWeek2025 on @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social - many thanks to @roohighosh.bsky.social & Maryam Sayab for this years week of posts incl today’s thoughts from @irfanullah.bsky.social Tim Vines, Hong Zhou, Maryam & me scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2025/09/15/a...

Black background with "Can AI do it all? Not without humans" text. Images show collaborative work and technology, emphasizing human-machine synergy.

Graphic with Elsevier logo asks, 'Can AI replace peer reviewers? No.' Text highlights AI as a tool supporting peer review with essential human judgment. Includes abstract patterns and two diverse people using laptops, emphasizing technology and collaboration.

Bright orange background with white text, "AI is a support tool, not a decision-maker," and logos at the top. Blue "Learn more" button below.

AI is transforming research and publishing, but human judgment remains essential.

For #PeerReviewWeek2025, we’re separating fact from fiction with insights from experts.

🔗 See more: spkl.io/63321ARr7X

Happy #PeerReviewWeek2025 to all those that celebrate! 🥳 #EditorsLife

It's #PeerReviewWeek2025! Join us as we reflect on how #AI is reshaping peer review and the broader scholarly publishing ecosystem. We'll be sharing peer review content and resources throughout the week ⬇️ @peerreviewweek.bsky.social

Can AI do it all? Not without humans

Can AI replace peer reviewers? No

AI is a support tool, not a decision-maker.

AI is evolving—and so are the tools we use in scientific publishing. But one thing hasn’t changed: human expertise leads the way. This Peer Review Week, we’re sharing quick facts to challenge common fiction. Discover what experts think: spkl.io/63329AutP7 #PeerReviewWeek2025

Can AI do it all? Not without humans

Can AI replace peer reviewers? No

AI is a support tool, not a decision-maker.

AI is evolving—and so are the tools we use in scientific publishing. But one thing hasn’t changed: human expertise leads the way. This Peer Review Week, we’re sharing quick facts to challenge common fiction. Discover what experts think: spkl.io/63327AutPf #PeerReviewWeek2025

Can AI do it all? Not without humans

Can AI replace peer reviewers? No

AI is a support tool, not a decision-maker.

AI is evolving—and so are the tools we use in scientific publishing. But one thing hasn’t changed: human expertise leads the way. This Peer Review Week, we’re sharing quick facts to challenge common fiction. Discover what experts think: spkl.io/63326AutP4 #PeerReviewWeek2025

Can AI do it all? Not without humans

Can AI replace peer reviewers? No

AI is a support tool, not a decision-maker.

AI is evolving—and so are the tools we use in scientific publishing. But one thing hasn’t changed: human expertise leads the way. This Peer Review Week, we’re sharing quick facts to challenge common fiction. Discover what experts think: spkl.io/63328AutPA #PeerReviewWeek2025

Reviewers increasingly divided on the use of generative AI in peer review - IOP Publishing A new global reviewer survey from IOP Publishing (IOPP) reveals a growing divide in attitudes among reviewers in the physical sciences regarding the use of generative AI in peer review. The study foll...

🎉 A huge thank you to everyone who took part in our survey “Peer review in the era of AI”. As part of #PeerReviewWeek2025, we’re delighted to share insights gathered from your contributions.

👉 Read the full report
ioppublishing.org/news/reviewe...

#PeerReview #AIinResearch #ResearchIntegrity

🎉 A huge thank you to everyone who took part in our survey “Peer review in the era of AI”.
As part of #PeerReviewWeek2025, we’re delighted to share insights gathered from your contributions.
👉 Read the full report: ioppublishing.org/news/reviewe...

#PeerReview #AIinResearch #ResearchIntegrity

🎉 A huge thank you to everyone who took part in our survey “Peer review in the era of AI”.

As part of #PeerReviewWeek2025, we’re delighted to share insights gathered from your contributions.

👉Read the full report: ioppublishing.org/news/reviewe...
#PeerReview #AIinResearch #ResearchIntegrity

Reviewers increasingly divided on the use of generative AI in peer review - IOP Publishing A new global reviewer survey from IOP Publishing (IOPP) reveals a growing divide in attitudes among reviewers in the physical sciences regarding the use of generative AI in peer review. The study foll...

🎉 It’s #PeerReviewWeek2025 and we’re celebrating with this year’s theme: Rethinking Peer Review in the AI Era.

We sent out a global survey to our reviewer community to see what researchers really think about the use of AI in peer review:

Read full story here: ow.ly/1hww50WVaiU