Evaluating the accuracy of screening titles and abstracts for progressing to full text screening by one versus two independent reviewers: Part 1 of a meta-research study of rapid review methodological... To determine the accuracy for progressing records to full text screening using one versus two reviewers to screen title and abstracts in three reviews of the effectiveness of interventions for chronic...

#CochraneDaily Just published! Study of accuracy of screening titles & abstracts for rapid reviews by 1 vs 2 reviewers, building on research from 25 years ago
www.jclinepi.com/article/S089...
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/...

#RapidReviews #EvidenceSynthesis @andreatricco.bsky.social

Rapid review method series: interim guidance for the reporting of rapid reviews Rapid reviews (RRs) are produced using abbreviated methods compared with standard systematic reviews (SR) to expedite the process for decision-making. This paper provides interim guidance to support t...

FYI - Rapid review method series: interim guidance for the reporting of rapid reviews ebm.bmj.com/content/30/2... #rapidreviews #medlibs #canmedlibs

Cochrane RR Methods | Cochrane Rapid Reviews Interim Cochrane Rapid Review Methods

⚡ Discover the latest in Cochrane Rapid Reviews methods guidance, resources & updates for faster, reliable evidence.👀

👉 methods.cochrane.org/rapidreviews...

#RapidReviews #EvidenceSynthesis

What's new in rapid reviews? Cochrane Interactive Learning

🚨 New learning module has just dropped! Our latest interactive module on rapid reviews is now live.

🕒 90–120 minutes of self-paced learning
📚 practical tips and step-by-step guidance

Find out more: www.cochrane.org/learn/course...

#CochraneLearning #RapidReviews #EvidenceBasedMedicine

Cochrane launches new interactive learning module on rapid reviews | Cochrane

Cochrane launches new interactive learning module on #RapidReviews #EvidenceSynthesis www.cochrane.org/about-us/new...

Quality improvement needed for rapid review reports: a literature quality assessment based on Cochrane RR evidence-based methodology - Systematic Reviews Objectives The aim of this study was to assess the reporting quality of rapid reviews (RRs) against the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methodological Guidance to identify areas for improvement. Methods A lite...

#CochraneDaily Just published! Study of 112 rapid reviews published before March 2023 found quality improvements after 2021 but that there are critical gaps in stakeholder engagement and protocol transparency systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10....
#EvidenceSynthesis #RapidReviews

Updating the PRISMA reporting guidelines for network meta-analyses and scoping reviews and developing PRISMA reporting guidelines for rapid reviews: a protocol for methods scoping reviews Hosted on the Open Science Framework

Updating the #PRISMA #reportingguidelines for network meta-analyses and scoping reviews and developing PRISMA reporting guidelines for #RapidReviews: a protocol for methods #ScopingReviews osf.io/zukhb/

10. Guidance on the conduct and standards for ‘Rapid Revi...

We have guidelines on the conduct and standards for #RapidReviews.

Please check them out: environmentalevidence.org/information-for-authors/...

New #EvidenceSynthesis on short-cuts in #RapidReviews in #EnvironmentalManagement. We found the 26 #RRs included used short-cuts at every stage. Few used a #Protocol, #CriticalAppraisal, #Guidelines or involved #Stakeholders.

Read the new article here: https://rdcu.be/dqeyV

Page Not Found - OASPA

Watch: oaspa.org/webinar-shaping-the-futu...

Glad to see #RapidReviews EIC on this panel. It's been a successful experiment in preprint peer review and we've expanded beyond just COVID19 reviews as of this year.

Guidelines for Authors – Environmental Evidence

CEE Journal, #EnvironmentalEvidence, is now accepting submissions of #RapidReviews. See Guidance environmentalevidence.org/information-for-authors/ and submission procedure https://bit.ly/EE_rapidreview 2/2