Anfang des gedruckten Artikels mit Abstract: Schleichende Aneignung, symbolische Markierung und Gewalt Die extreme Rechte und ihre Praktiken der Raumaneignung in Deutschland nach 1945 Daniel Gerster Abstract Historical research on the extreme right after 1945 has gained attention in Germany only in recent years. Focusing initially on social actors, their organizations and ideologies, it has now turned to new questions and approaches. This article shows how research can profit from a spatial historical approach. It focusses on practices of spatial appropriation and examines the ways in which the extreme right in Germany attempted to occupy (public) space and to impose its ideas of order after 1945. Three modes of spatial appropriation repeatedly used by the extreme right take center stage: gradual occupation, symbolic marking, and violent seizure. These are ideal types which are intertwined in historical practice, as is shown with regard to the so-called »nationally liberated zones« of the 1990s and 2000s. In general, the article shows how a spatial-historical approach can help to deconstruct one-dimensional descriptions. It allows the simultaneity of different perceptions and practices to be depicted and incorporates the perspectives of those affected by the extreme right as well as those of other actors. Keywords: Extreme Right, Germany, Spatial Appropriation, Nationally Liberated Zones, Violence

NEU: #WerkstattGeschichte 92
🧵 6/

#Werkstatt: Daniel Gerster stellt Ansätze vor, wie die #Raumgeschichte einen gewinnbringenden Beitrag zur #Zeitgeschichte des bundesdeutschen #Rechtsextremismus leisten kann:

▶ […]

[Original post on openbiblio.social]