On and off-the-record correction practices: A survey-based study of how chemistry researchers react to errors This survey-based study (982 participants) explores chemistry researchers’ practices and motivations in correcting errors in scientific publications.While respondents believe errors should be corre...

✨My new survey-based study on how chemistry researchers react to errors is now published in Accountability in Research @accountabilityair.bsky.social! A big thanks to the participants & @nanobubbles.bsky.social members for feedback 🫧. #ScienceCorrection #ResearchOnResearch doi.org/10.1080/0898...

Moving Open Repositories out of the Blind Spot of Initiatives to Correct the Scholarly Record Open repositories were created to enhance access and visibility of scholarly publications, driven by open science ideals emphasising transparency and accessibility. However, they lack mechanisms to u....

🚀 Just published in @learnedpublishing.bsky.social!

Moving Open Repositories out of the Blind Spot of Initiatives to Correct the Scholarly Record
🔗 doi.org/10.1002/leap...

About open repositories failing to reflect corrections and retractions
#OpenArchives #Repositories #ScienceCorrection