A Newer Deal Part 9: Fix politics! And a (very) few people who seem to get it.
I'm close to finishing my **Newer Deal series,** a ten-part – _(“tl;dr”)_ -- array of **thirty-five proposals for Democrats and their allies, **that might empower them to save America and the world, during the year ahead.
(Folks who’d rather view it through Substack might start here.)
Yes, I waste time in forlorn hope that fresh ideas will influence a party that – while they are the good-guys in this era of vicious national strife – are arthritic/calcified in their tactical and polemical rigidity. Still, a few folks out there appear sufficiently immune to the Zorblaxxian Lobotomy Ray to actually read and comment cogently.
Here’s one fellow whose Substack appraisal of my “Newer Deal” is not just coherently lucid. It riffs fresh perspectives about what's happened to American conservatism, plummeting from the erudite honesty of William F. Buckley to the clever hypocrisy of Newt Gingrich, to Sarah Palin's dizzy unsapience, to the vile purity of Trumpism.
Heck, go read him instead of me. While flattering -- he calls me a "political gadfly with a blog that reads like Thomas Paine crossed with a frustrated systems engineer" -- the fellow is also incisive: "if you can’t get 60% of Americans to nod along, you’re not doing politics. You’re doing wishful thinking. And wishful thinking, however righteous, loses elections."*** There's even a short summary of some of my proposals that impressed him most.
But on with this slog! I gave the full list of proposals in Part Three. Then, in parts 4-8, I dissect and appraise most of them - from _IGUS_ (Inspector General of the United States) to subpoena powers for the Congressional minority, to sunsetting secrets and NDAs, to restoring in-Congress expertise that Newt Gingrich banned, so that uppity nerds could not utter the words that no Republican wants to hear: _"Um, sir or madam, that's not true."_
Now in Part 9 let's serve up a few more, so we can wrap up my year-end daydream... that anyone will listen.
**
**
**== Gerrymandering ==**
By now we're all familiar with the desperately-evil way politicians steal powers that belong to the People. I cheered when Californians - urged by moderate GOP governor Schwarzenegger - ended the vile practice by popular referendum, as have a number of other blue states... but effectively no red ones. And those lopsided efforts put the absolute lie to Republican claims that 'everybody does it.' (As it's been blue states leading the way in ending the damned Drug War.)
So, Maryland and Illinois gerrymander too? And now California has retaliated vs. the obscenely shameless voter rape by the Texas GOP?
BFD. Just watch. If they ever get a chance, Democrats will ban it, nationwide! As I propose here:
**END GERRYMANDERING!** We shall return the legislative branch to the people, by finding a solution to an indefensible cheat that lets politicians choose voters, instead of the other way around. We shall encourage and insist that states do this in an evenhanded manner, either by using independent redistricting commissions or else by innovative and inherently fair means, like minimizing overlap between state legislature districts and those for Congress.
Since in many districts, the majority party primary is the only election that matters, we shall act to see to it that all citizens in such a district may get to vote in that election, regardless of party registration.
Newly elected members of Congress with credentials from their states shall be sworn in by impartial clerks of either the House or Senate, without partisan bias, and at the new member’s convenience.
The House may be called into session, with or without action by the Speaker, at any time that a petition is submitted to the Chief Clerk that was signed by 40% of the members.
That last couple of paragraphs was added to address recent, outrageously turpitudinous behavior by "Speaker" Mike Johnson in the fall of 2025.
**Note:** 1) The _Senate_ remains inherently gerrymandered to favor small states with extra power. (We needed TWO Dakotas?) Forget changing that, for now. Concentrate on reminding farmers why their grandparents loved Franklin Roosevelt.
2) John Roberts and ilk will continue concocting contorted rationalizations to allow continuation of gerrymandering's massive cheat. Hence, elsewhere I offer innovative ways to get around the "Roberts Doctrine" that wriggle-justifies letting state legislators rob their own citizens of voting power. See a general deep-dive ... and this never-seen-elsewhere proposal!
**== Defend the enemy they hate most**
**-- their enemy called __fact__ ==**
Some years ago the Internet Caucus of the California Democratic Party asked me to write -- and publicly present -- a piece of 'futuristic legislation." While tempted to address changes in the Outer Space Treaty that we discussed at NASA's Innovative & Advanced Concepts program - (NIAC) - or at the Space Development Conference...
... I chose instead to try out something _hugely_ _science fictional_... encouraging Americans to _rediscover something called Objective Reality!_
Summarized and condensed, here it is.
******THE FACT ACT****:** The Fact Act will begin by restoring the media _Rebuttal Rule,_ prying open "echo chamber" propaganda mills so that assertions may at least be briefly challenged by opponents.
Any channel, or station, or Internet podcast, or meme distributor that accepts advertising or reaches more than 10,000 followers will be required to offer five minutes per day during prime time and ten minutes at other times to reputable 'vigorous adversaries.' Until other methods are negotiated, each member of Congress shall get to choose one such vigorous adversary, ensuring that all perspectives may be involved.
Those 535 groups will get equal numbers of subpoenas to forge forth and challenge echo chambers, so that they may then supply further material evidence on their public sites. And those adversary sites will be subject to this same rebuttal rule.
The Fact Act will further fund experimental Fact-Challenges, where major public disagreements may be openly and systematically debated and adversaries reciprocally confronted with demands for specific evidence.
The Fact Act will restore full funding and staffing and autonomy to both the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment and the executive Office of Science and Technology Policy (OTSP).
Every member of Congress shall be funded to hire a _science and fact advisor_ from their home district, who may interrogate the advisory bodies – an advisor who may also answer questions of fact on the member’s behalf.
This bill further requires that the President must fill, by law, the position of White House Science Adviser from a diverse and bipartisan slate of qualified candidates offered by the Academy of Science. The Science Adviser shall have uninterrupted access to the President for at least two one-hour sessions per month.4****
And yes, I know parts of this will never pass. But notice the common theme for at least half of my proposals. Not only will they sound reasonable to 60%+ of average, voting people, but they are nearly all about ensuring the continuation of the 'secret sauce' of our enlightenment experiment.
Accountability.
**== VOTER ID ==**
STOP OPPOSING THIS! It's a trap to make us look bad.
Sure, confederates want to use Voter ID laws to repress voting by poor US citizens, as with their old tricks like poll taxes. (They have _never_ shown appreciable evidence of significant non-citizen voting.) Still, _blanket_ rejection of voter ID is just walking into a trap. Stop reacting out of reflex!
Instead, we must _point to the hypocrisy!_ That these same states are currently _closing DMV and state services offices in districts with Democratic voters._ The exact places to _get_ that ID they need!
Hence, the GOPper cheaters aren't aiming at honesty or verification, but repression! Moreover, when it is put to folks _this way,_ you can be sure that millions will grasp the difference. And give us that 60%+.
Also note, helping poor US citizens to _get their ID resolved_ is a great way to help __ them _stop being_ _poor!_ Helping them to rise up in the world. And also, it will help protect U.S. citizens from abuse by ICE!
Let's be seen as the ones offering fair and just solutions.
****
**THE VOTER ID ACT:** Under the 13th and 14th Amendments, this act requires that states mandating Voter ID requirements must offer substantial and effective _compliance assistance,_ helping affected citizens to acquire their entitled legal ID and register to vote.
Any state that fails to provide such assistance, substantially reducing the fraction of eligible citizens turned away at the polls, shall be assumed to be in violation of equal protection and engaged in illegal voter suppression.
If such compliance assistance has been vigorous and effective for ten years, then that state may institute requirements for Voter ID.
In all states, registration for citizens to vote shall be automatic with a driver’s license, or passport, or state-issued ID, unless the citizen opts-out.
Any state that 'purges' its voter rolls must first attempt to contact affected voters, both via their registered address and, using modern technologies, conveying such notification to them via any accessible change-of-address process, such as used by the Postal Service.
Note that "compliance assistance" has long been a demand _by Republicans,_ whenever a new regulation puts any kind of burden on corporations or rich individuals. There's ample precedent for insisting that the principle also apply, when burdens are imposed upon the poor.
Dig it again: _do not fall for their traps!_ They are the ones doing electoral cheating of all kinds. Don't give them a chance to point at us.
**== EQUAL VOTING RIGHTS FOR THE HOUSE! ==**
As I said, there is an inherent 'gerrymander bias', imposed upon us by the Constitution, in apportionment of seats in the U.S. Senate. And while I'd amend that bias away, if I could, I can't... we can't... so _stop whining about it._ OR about the Electoral College!**
But the the House of Representative is a different story. As the Senate represents states, the House is supposed to represent the People with utter fairness. And it doesn't, because of a silly law (_not_ in the Constitution) from the 1920s. Which was incidentally the heyday of the Ku Kux Klan.
And so...
**THE WYOMING RULE:** Congress shall end the arrangement (under the Permanent Apportionment Act of 1929) that perpetually limits the House of Representatives to 435 members. Instead, it will institute the Wyoming Rule, that the least-populated state shall get one representative and all other states will be apportioned representatives according to their population by full-integer multiples of the smallest state's population. The Senate’s inherent bias favoring small states should be enough. In the House, all citizens should get votes of equal value.
Note a few things. The newest members would be tight for office space! But technology should let up to 600 representatives vote, just fine. It would bring reps closer to their now-fewer constituents. And yes, urban voters would see some relief from their wholly unjustifiable under-representation in the House.
Oh, and yes, this would affect the Electoral College. By a bit. Not tons. But some.
** And there are things we can do about the Electoral College other than the silly National Popular Vote Compact. We can discuss those elsewhere. But they do not fall under the 60%+ Rule.
== Housing and Rural Citizens ==
**THE RURAL AMERICA AND HOUSING ACT:** Giant corporations and cartels are using predatory practices to unfairly corner, control or force-out family farms and small rural businesses. We shall upgrade FDR-era laws that saved the American heartland for the people who live and work there, producing the nation’s food. Subsidies and price supports shall only go to family farms or co-ops. Monopolies in fertilizer, seeds, machinery and other supplies will be broken up and replaced by competition. Living and working and legal conditions for farm workers and food processing workers will be improved by steady public and private investments.
Cartels that buy-up America’s stock of homes and home-builders will be investigated for collusion to limit construction and/or drive up rents and home prices and appropriate legislation will follow.
These final two are pretty much self-explanatory. And heck yes, the Rural America Act is a blatant effort to persuade farmers and such to ask their grandparents about FDR.
The next one speaks for itself. If expressed right, sustainability can come under the 60%+ rule.
== Sustainability ==
**THE SUSTAINABILITY ACT** will make it America’s priority to pioneer technological paths toward energy independence, emphasizing economic health that also conserves both national and world resources. Ambitious efficiency and conservation standards may be accompanied by compromise free market solutions that emphasize a wide variety of participants, with the goal of achieving more with less, while safeguarding the planet for our children.
**== Getting near the end ==**
Okay, enough for this session. But me reiterate a core point...
... that our biggest problem right now is to patch the damage done to America's systems of accountability, deliberation, negotiation, resilience and pragmatic problem-solving! Problem solving by the People and by honest representatives, who are adults and sincere citizens. And hence, most of these proposals are about that...
_..while passing the 60%+ test._ Reforms that are so blatantly reasonable that they might bridge simplistic partisan chasms and draw nods of support from most decent folks. And hence... their votes.
**Do we want more?** You'll get more! As in the miracle year of 2021-22, when Pelosi+Schumer etc. allied with Bernie, Liz, AOC and their wing to pass some really excellent bills! They concentrated mostly on governing -- infrastructure and taxation, better bureaucracy and bringing home domestic manufacturing. All of them great priorities! And if you get all _children_ under Medicare (one of these proposals) then the rest becomes inevitable.
Only, alas...
...what we need right now, above all, is a heap of reforms to _save the very notions of democracy and accountable law, themselves_... and even the very concept of things called facts.
Hence, those aims have been our top emphasis, here. We'd be weathering the Trumpian psychotic episode far better, if some of these simple measures had been in place, when a perverted tyrant-toddler took over the helm of our great ship-of-state, steering it toward rocks.
In Part Ten we'll round out some of the last items from the agenda that I've offered in this series. Including -- yes -- some of the stuff you hyper-liberals want on the agenda.
And sure. Some of those things are pretty urgent, too. Just as soon as we cement-in the survival of any sort of decent republic, at all.
======================================
======================================
*** When "Mongoose" says that you need 60% to 'do politics' he's talking about _now,_ amid phase 9 of the US Civil War, when we have deeply opposing 'sides' and the art of _negotiating_ has long been shredded by one of those sides.__ And one of those sides is entirely responsible. Look up Dennis "friend to boys" Hastert, the criminal perv whom Republicans elevated to head of their party and Speaker and two heartbeats from presidency. The "Hastert Rule" forbade any Republican officeholder from ever again negotiating in good faith with a Democrat, or even having one as a friend. And politics - as an art of listening, negotiating and occasional compromise - died that day in America.
Perhaps someday we'll return to the maturity of when Americans with just 40% support will be heard and get to make practical tradeoffs with their neighbors in positive sum ways. It may take a space mission to destroy that Zorblaxxian Lobotomy Ray that's been shining down on this country for some time, now.
A Newer Deal Part 9: Fix politics! And a (very) few people who seem to get it. I'm close to finishing my Newer Deal series , a ten-part – (“tl;dr”) -- array of thirty-five propos...
#a #new #deal #for #america #david #brin #democratic #new #deal #political
Origin | Interest | Match
