So interesting! Say, on your account would it still make sense to insist on #commonmeasures as some funders and metascientists do?
What are the limits of #commonmeasures initiative given that validation is always relative to context and population? How to balance between the needs of comparability which favours small # of measures and sensitivity which favours having lots?
The Q&A of Session#2 #MWMsymposium brings up questions around standardisation and #CommonMeasures.
Standardisation is highly desirable for research efforts and practice implementation. But the relevant indicators and their meaning differ across countries, if not even regions.
#CoreOutcomes #ISOQOL
It depends indeed! The supposed benefits of #commonmeasures in mental health and wellbeing research are far less clear. Psych phenomena differ in their stability across contexts and for some phenomena cumulativity has to take a different form. Anyhow thanks for engaging!