phrack meme

here's an old classic from #phrack - the tricks have become even more complex and we'll never ask you to donate to a patreon for our content!

Picture of the physical edition of Phrack, issue 72

finally got my copy of #phrack 72 👾

Hacker's Manifesto Click to read the article on phrack

Happy 40 YEAR anniversary to the day this was written:

\/\The Conscience of a Hacker/\/

Appeared first in @phrack.org issue 7 - phrack.org/issues/7/3

I believe it made an appearance on a particular @defcon.bsky.social badge too in more recent years 🤔

#phrack #defcon #phreaking #hacking #HPA

Wait, BBS still exists? I was big in BBS days. Like scary big.
#phrack #31337sorz.

Phrack homepage

40 anni della ezine #hacker più rispettata .:: #Phrack Magazine ::. https://phrack.org/

@internet

#hacking #ezine

Photo einer Ausgabe des Phrack Magazins

Vielleicht bin ich etwas spät dran, aber wenn jemand möchte hätte ich hier noch 2 gedruckte Ausgaben vom #Phrack Magazine der 40th Anniversary Edition vom #WHY2025 gegen Porto oder im Raum #Berlin abzugeben.
Eine komplett ungelesen die andere hab ich etwas […]

[Original post on social.tchncs.de]

The Hacker's Renaissance - A Manifesto Reborn Click to read the article on phrack

A highlight of Phrack's 40th anniversary edition is a re-imagining of The Mentor's Hacker's Manifesto. Not only an excellent comparison of then vs. now, but also a call to action for new generations of hackers. The spirit lives on.

#phrack #hacking #manifesto

phrack.org/issues/72/19#art...

The Hacker's Renaissance - A Manifesto Reborn Click to read the article on phrack

The Hacker's Renaissance - A Manifesto Reborn phrack.org/issues/72... #phrack #phrack72

Sonderausgabe des 40th Jahrganges des Phrack Magazins zu den Datenspuren 2025 in Dresden.

Die Sonderausgabe des @phrack.org Zines von den #Datenspuren 2025 vergangenes Wochenende in #Dresden. Eine super nette Geste. Vielen Dank dafür.

#phrack #phrack72 #phrackzine #ds25 #datenspuren25

This appears to be a social media post showing what looks like a bronze or dark metal sculpture of a face in profile. The sculpture has classical features and appears to be mounted or displayed, with some colorful decorative elements visible in the background that have blue and gold coloring. There’s a video call overlay in the top-left corner showing someone in a blue shirt (appears to be a Michigan “M” logo), and the post is labeled “Balzac / Phrack” at the bottom. The location shows “Ann Arbor, Main Street” and there’s a Spotify music indicator showing “Ronnie Foster - Mystic Brew.” Based on the labeling and location, this appears to be a sculpture of the famous French novelist Honoré de Balzac, likely displayed somewhere on Main Street in Ann Arbor, Michigan. The post seems to be shared by someone named “peterhoneyman” and was posted “6h late” according to the timestamp.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Balzac / Phrack

#Balzac #Phrack #BeReal

Proton sospende account di giornalisti: la linea sottile tra ToS e protezione dei whistleblower
il blog: insicurezzadigitale.com/proton-sospe...

#cybersecurity #kimsuky #phrack #proton #protonmail

Hey @proton.me, need help calibrating your moral compass? Why have you suspended the journalist's acocunts and then ghosted them?

I have 2 more questions
-what's going on in Ukraine?
-whose fault is it?

theintercept.com/2025/09/12/p...

x.com/phrack/statu...

#protonmail #journalism #phrack

Proton Mail Suspended Journalist Accounts at Request of Cybersecurity Agency The journalists were reporting on suspected North Korean hackers. Proton only reinstated their accounts after a public outcry.

So glad I’m not using #Proton anymore
#Phrack

theintercept.com/2025/09/12/p...

The company behind the Proton Mail email service, Proton, describes itself as a “neutral and safe haven for your personal data, committed to defending your freedom.” But last month, Proton disabled email accounts belonging to journalists reporting on security breaches of various South Korean government computer systems following a complaint by an unspecified cybersecurity agency. After a public outcry, and multiple weeks, the journalists’ accounts were eventually reinstated — but the reporters and editors involved still want answers on how and why Proton decided to shut down the accounts in the first place. Martin Shelton, deputy director of digital security at the Freedom of the Press Foundation, highlighted that numerous newsrooms use Proton’s services as alternatives to something like Gmail “specifically to avoid situations like this,” pointing out that “While it’s good to see that Proton is reconsidering account suspensions, journalists are among the users who need these and similar tools most.” Newsrooms like The Intercept, the Boston Globe, and the Tampa Bay Times all rely on Proton Mail for emailed tip submissions. Shelton noted that perhaps Proton should “prioritize responding to journalists about account suspensions privately, rather than when they go viral.” On Reddit, Proton’s official account stated that “Proton did not knowingly block journalists’ email accounts” and that the “situation has unfortunately been blown out of proportion.” Proton did not respond to The Intercept’s request for comment. ## Most Read U.S. Attacked Boat Near Venezuela Multiple Times to Kill Survivors Nick Turse Rand Paul Reveals Venezuela Boat Attack Was a Drone Strike Nick Turse Pentagon Official: Trump Boat Strike Was a Criminal Attack on Civilians Nick Turse The two journalists whose accounts were disabled were working on an article published in the August issue of the long-running hacker zine Phrack. The story described how a sophisticated hacking operation — what’s known in cybersecurity parlance as an APT, or advanced persistent threat — had wormed its way into a number of South Korean computer networks, including those of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the military Defense Counterintelligence Command, or DCC. The journalists, who published their story under the names Saber and cyb0rg, describe the hack as being consistent with the work of Kimsuky, a notorious North Korean state-backed APT sanctioned by the U.S. Treasury Department in 2023. As they pieced the story together, emails viewed by The Intercept show that the authors followed cybersecurity best practices and conducted what’s known as responsible disclosure: notifying affected parties that a vulnerability has been discovered in their systems prior to publicizing the incident. Saber and cyb0rg created a dedicated Proton Mail account to coordinate the responsible disclosures, then proceeded to notify the impacted parties, including the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the DCC, and also notified South Korean cybersecurity organizations like the Korea Internet and Security Agency, and KrCERT/CC, the state-sponsored Computer Emergency Response Team. According to emails viewed by The Intercept, KrCERT wrote back to the authors, thanking them for their disclosure. A note on cybersecurity jargon: CERTs are agencies consisting of cybersecurity experts specializing in dealing with and responding to security incidents. CERTs exist in over 70 countries — with some countries having multiple CERTs each specializing in a particular field such as the financial sector — and may be government-sponsored or private organizations. They adhere to a set of formal technical standards, such as being expected to react to reported cybersecurity threats and security incidents. A high-profile example of a CERT agency in the U.S. is the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency, which has recently been gutted by the Trump administration. ## We’re independent of corporate interests — and powered by members. Join us. Become a member ## Join Our Newsletter Thank You For Joining! Original reporting. Fearless journalism. Delivered to you. Will you take the next step to support our independent journalism by becoming a member of The Intercept? I'm in Become a member By signing up, I agree to receive emails from The Intercept and to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. ## Join Our Newsletter ## Original reporting. Fearless journalism. Delivered to you. I'm in A week after the print issue of Phrack came out, and a few days before the digital version was released, Saber and cyb0rg found that the Proton account they had set up for the responsible disclosure notifications had been suspended. A day later, Saber discovered that his personal Proton Mail account had also been suspended. Phrack posted a timeline of the account suspensions at the top of the published article, and later highlighted the timeline in a viral social media post. Both accounts were suspended owing to an unspecified “potential policy violation,” according to screenshots of account login attempts reviewed by The Intercept. The suspension notice instructed the authors to fill out Proton’s abuse appeals form if they believed the suspension was in error. Saber did so, and received a reply from a member of Proton Mail’s Abuse Team who went by the name Dante. In an email viewed by The Intercept, Dante told Saber that their account “has been disabled as a result of a direct connection to an account that was taken down due to violations of our terms and conditions while being used in a malicious manner.” Dante also provided a link to Proton’s terms of service, going on to state, “We have clearly indicated that any account used for unauthorized activities, will be sanctioned accordingly.” The response concluded by stating, “We consider that allowing access to your account will cause further damage to our service, therefore we will keep the account suspended.” On August 22, a Phrack editors reached out to Proton, writing that no hacked data was passed through the suspended email accounts, and asked if the account suspension incident could be deescalated. After receiving no response from Proton, the editor sent a follow-up email on September 6. Proton once again did not reply to the email. On September 9, the official Phrack X account made a post asking Proton’s official account asking why Proton was “cancelling journalists and ghosting us,” adding: “need help calibrating your moral compass?” The post quickly went viral, garnering over 150,000 views. Proton’s official account replied the following day, stating that Proton had been “alerted by a CERT that certain accounts were being misused by hackers in violation of Proton’s Terms of Service. This led to a cluster of accounts being disabled. Our team is now reviewing these cases individually to determine if any can be restored.” Proton then stated that they “stand with journalists” but “cannot see the content of accounts and therefore cannot always know when anti-abuse measures may inadvertently affect legitimate activism.” Proton did not publicly specify which CERT had alerted them, and didn’t answer The Intercept’s request for the name of the specific CERT which had sent the alert. KrCERT also did not reply to The Intercept’s question about whether they were the CERT that had sent the alert to Proton. ## Related ### Proton Mail Says It’s “Politically Neutral” While Praising Republican Party Later in the day, Proton’s founder and CEO Andy Yen posted on X that the two accounts had been reinstated. Neither Yen nor Proton explained why the accounts had been reinstated, whether they had been found to not violate the terms of service after all, why had they been suspended in the first place, or why a member of the Proton Abuse Team reiterated that the accounts had violated the terms of service during Saber’s appeals process. Phrack noted that the account suspensions created a “real impact to the author. The author was unable to answer media requests about the article.” The co-authors, Phrack pointed out, were also in the midst of the responsible disclosure process and working together with the various affected South Korean organizations to help fix their systems. “All this was denied and ruined by Proton,” Phrack stated. Phrack editors said that the incident leaves them “concerned what this means to other whistleblowers or journalists. The community needs assurance that Proton does not disable accounts unless Proton has a court order or the crime (or ToS violation) is apparent.” Share * Copy link * Share on Facebook * Share on Bluesky * Share on X * Share on LinkedIn * Share on WhatsApp _IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT._ What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government. This is not hyperbole. Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation. Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.” The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy. ## We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us? $15 $25 $50 $100 $5 $8 $10 $15 One Time Monthly Donate ## Contact the author: Nikita Mazurov ## Related ### China Didn’t Want You to See This Video of Xi and Putin. So Reuters Deleted It. ### Alex Karp Insists Palantir Doesn’t Spy on Americans. Here’s What He’s Not Saying. ### Crossing the U.S. Border? Here’s How to Protect Yourself ### These Human Rights Defenders Were Hacked by Pegasus. Now They Want Police to Charge the Spyware Maker. ## Latest Stories ### China Didn’t Want You to See This Video of Xi and Putin. So Reuters Deleted It. Nikita Mazurov - 1:45 pm Following a copyright takedown request, Reuters removed a hot mic video of Putin and Xi discussing life extension and immortality. ### Alex Karp Insists Palantir Doesn’t Spy on Americans. Here’s What He’s Not Saying. Sam Biddle - 10:00 am Documents from Edward Snowden published by The Intercept in 2017 show the NSA’s use of Palantir technology. Israel’s War on Gaza ### Gaza Aid Security Contractor Hired Members of “Islamophobic Hate Group” Biker Club, Dem Rep Says Matt Sledge - 7:00 am At least 10 members of the Infidels worked in Gaza for GHF’s security contractor, the BBC reported, with seven in oversight roles. Join The Conversation

So glad I’m not using #Proton anymore
#Phrack

theintercept.com/2025/09/12/proton-mail-j...

The company behind the Proton Mail email service, Proton, describes itself as a “neutral and safe haven for your personal data, committed to defending your freedom.” But last month, Proton disabled email accounts belonging to journalists reporting on security breaches of various South Korean government computer systems following a complaint by an unspecified cybersecurity agency. After a public outcry, and multiple weeks, the journalists’ accounts were eventually reinstated — but the reporters and editors involved still want answers on how and why Proton decided to shut down the accounts in the first place. Martin Shelton, deputy director of digital security at the Freedom of the Press Foundation, highlighted that numerous newsrooms use Proton’s services as alternatives to something like Gmail “specifically to avoid situations like this,” pointing out that “While it’s good to see that Proton is reconsidering account suspensions, journalists are among the users who need these and similar tools most.” Newsrooms like The Intercept, the Boston Globe, and the Tampa Bay Times all rely on Proton Mail for emailed tip submissions. Shelton noted that perhaps Proton should “prioritize responding to journalists about account suspensions privately, rather than when they go viral.” On Reddit, Proton’s official account stated that “Proton did not knowingly block journalists’ email accounts” and that the “situation has unfortunately been blown out of proportion.” Proton did not respond to The Intercept’s request for comment. ## Most Read U.S. Attacked Boat Near Venezuela Multiple Times to Kill Survivors Nick Turse Rand Paul Reveals Venezuela Boat Attack Was a Drone Strike Nick Turse Pentagon Official: Trump Boat Strike Was a Criminal Attack on Civilians Nick Turse The two journalists whose accounts were disabled were working on an article published in the August issue of the long-running hacker zine Phrack. The story described how a sophisticated hacking operation — what’s known in cybersecurity parlance as an APT, or advanced persistent threat — had wormed its way into a number of South Korean computer networks, including those of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the military Defense Counterintelligence Command, or DCC. The journalists, who published their story under the names Saber and cyb0rg, describe the hack as being consistent with the work of Kimsuky, a notorious North Korean state-backed APT sanctioned by the U.S. Treasury Department in 2023. As they pieced the story together, emails viewed by The Intercept show that the authors followed cybersecurity best practices and conducted what’s known as responsible disclosure: notifying affected parties that a vulnerability has been discovered in their systems prior to publicizing the incident. Saber and cyb0rg created a dedicated Proton Mail account to coordinate the responsible disclosures, then proceeded to notify the impacted parties, including the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the DCC, and also notified South Korean cybersecurity organizations like the Korea Internet and Security Agency, and KrCERT/CC, the state-sponsored Computer Emergency Response Team. According to emails viewed by The Intercept, KrCERT wrote back to the authors, thanking them for their disclosure. A note on cybersecurity jargon: CERTs are agencies consisting of cybersecurity experts specializing in dealing with and responding to security incidents. CERTs exist in over 70 countries — with some countries having multiple CERTs each specializing in a particular field such as the financial sector — and may be government-sponsored or private organizations. They adhere to a set of formal technical standards, such as being expected to react to reported cybersecurity threats and security incidents. A high-profile example of a CERT agency in the U.S. is the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency, which has recently been gutted by the Trump administration. ## We’re independent of corporate interests — and powered by members. Join us. Become a member ## Join Our Newsletter Thank You For Joining! Original reporting. Fearless journalism. Delivered to you. Will you take the next step to support our independent journalism by becoming a member of The Intercept? I'm in Become a member By signing up, I agree to receive emails from The Intercept and to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. ## Join Our Newsletter ## Original reporting. Fearless journalism. Delivered to you. I'm in A week after the print issue of Phrack came out, and a few days before the digital version was released, Saber and cyb0rg found that the Proton account they had set up for the responsible disclosure notifications had been suspended. A day later, Saber discovered that his personal Proton Mail account had also been suspended. Phrack posted a timeline of the account suspensions at the top of the published article, and later highlighted the timeline in a viral social media post. Both accounts were suspended owing to an unspecified “potential policy violation,” according to screenshots of account login attempts reviewed by The Intercept. The suspension notice instructed the authors to fill out Proton’s abuse appeals form if they believed the suspension was in error. Saber did so, and received a reply from a member of Proton Mail’s Abuse Team who went by the name Dante. In an email viewed by The Intercept, Dante told Saber that their account “has been disabled as a result of a direct connection to an account that was taken down due to violations of our terms and conditions while being used in a malicious manner.” Dante also provided a link to Proton’s terms of service, going on to state, “We have clearly indicated that any account used for unauthorized activities, will be sanctioned accordingly.” The response concluded by stating, “We consider that allowing access to your account will cause further damage to our service, therefore we will keep the account suspended.” On August 22, a Phrack editors reached out to Proton, writing that no hacked data was passed through the suspended email accounts, and asked if the account suspension incident could be deescalated. After receiving no response from Proton, the editor sent a follow-up email on September 6. Proton once again did not reply to the email. On September 9, the official Phrack X account made a post asking Proton’s official account asking why Proton was “cancelling journalists and ghosting us,” adding: “need help calibrating your moral compass?” The post quickly went viral, garnering over 150,000 views. Proton’s official account replied the following day, stating that Proton had been “alerted by a CERT that certain accounts were being misused by hackers in violation of Proton’s Terms of Service. This led to a cluster of accounts being disabled. Our team is now reviewing these cases individually to determine if any can be restored.” Proton then stated that they “stand with journalists” but “cannot see the content of accounts and therefore cannot always know when anti-abuse measures may inadvertently affect legitimate activism.” Proton did not publicly specify which CERT had alerted them, and didn’t answer The Intercept’s request for the name of the specific CERT which had sent the alert. KrCERT also did not reply to The Intercept’s question about whether they were the CERT that had sent the alert to Proton. ## Related ### Proton Mail Says It’s “Politically Neutral” While Praising Republican Party Later in the day, Proton’s founder and CEO Andy Yen posted on X that the two accounts had been reinstated. Neither Yen nor Proton explained why the accounts had been reinstated, whether they had been found to not violate the terms of service after all, why had they been suspended in the first place, or why a member of the Proton Abuse Team reiterated that the accounts had violated the terms of service during Saber’s appeals process. Phrack noted that the account suspensions created a “real impact to the author. The author was unable to answer media requests about the article.” The co-authors, Phrack pointed out, were also in the midst of the responsible disclosure process and working together with the various affected South Korean organizations to help fix their systems. “All this was denied and ruined by Proton,” Phrack stated. Phrack editors said that the incident leaves them “concerned what this means to other whistleblowers or journalists. The community needs assurance that Proton does not disable accounts unless Proton has a court order or the crime (or ToS violation) is apparent.” Share * Copy link * Share on Facebook * Share on Bluesky * Share on X * Share on LinkedIn * Share on WhatsApp _IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT._ What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government. This is not hyperbole. Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation. Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.” The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy. ## We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us? $15 $25 $50 $100 $5 $8 $10 $15 One Time Monthly Donate ## Contact the author: Nikita Mazurov ## Related ### China Didn’t Want You to See This Video of Xi and Putin. So Reuters Deleted It. ### Alex Karp Insists Palantir Doesn’t Spy on Americans. Here’s What He’s Not Saying. ### Crossing the U.S. Border? Here’s How to Protect Yourself ### These Human Rights Defenders Were Hacked by Pegasus. Now They Want Police to Charge the Spyware Maker. ## Latest Stories ### China Didn’t Want You to See This Video of Xi and Putin. So Reuters Deleted It. Nikita Mazurov - 1:45 pm Following a copyright takedown request, Reuters removed a hot mic video of Putin and Xi discussing life extension and immortality. ### Alex Karp Insists Palantir Doesn’t Spy on Americans. Here’s What He’s Not Saying. Sam Biddle - 10:00 am Documents from Edward Snowden published by The Intercept in 2017 show the NSA’s use of Palantir technology. Israel’s War on Gaza ### Gaza Aid Security Contractor Hired Members of “Islamophobic Hate Group” Biker Club, Dem Rep Says Matt Sledge - 7:00 am At least 10 members of the Infidels worked in Gaza for GHF’s security contractor, the BBC reported, with seven in oversight roles. Join The Conversation

So glad I’m not using #Proton anymore
#Phrack

theintercept.com/2025/09/12/proton-mail-j...

#ThrowbackThursday from #defcon33, here's a panel discussion of the history, significance and legacy of the mighty @phrack.org. Enjoy, and pass it on.

https://youtu.be/TW-D1I27E08

#defcon #phrack #phrackzine

#ThrowbackThursday from #defcon33, here's a panel discussion of the history, significance and legacy of the mighty @phrack.org. Enjoy, and pass it on.

youtu.be/TW-D1I27E08

#defcon #phrack #phrackzine

Release proxmark3-v4.20728 · RfidResearchGroup/proxmark3 Release v4.20728 Nickname "Phrack" CHANGELOG - Phrack [2025-09-11] Change lf t55xx restore - now skips writing block0 if its all zeros (@iceman1001) Added HID Simplex Grinnell 36-bit - Improve...

The new Proxmark3 release "Phrack" (v4.20728) is out, a nod to the legendary security journal that has published so much foundational RFID research over the decades. A fitting name for this tool.

tinyurl.com/4249mszy

#Proxmark3 #RFID #Phrack #InfoSec

Proton Mail sperrt E-Mail-Accounts nach Nordkorea-Hack Weil der Autor des PDF-Magazins Phrack „weiteren Schaden an ihrem Dienst verursachen könnte" sperrte Proton Mail seinen Account. Der Artikel <a href="https://tarnkappe.info/artikel/cyberangriffe/proton-mail-sperrt-e-mail-accounts-nach-nordkorea-hack-320571.html">Proton Mail sperrt E-Mail-Accounts nach Nordkorea-Hack</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://tarnkappe.info">TARNKAPPE.INFO</a>

📬 Proton Mail sperrt E-Mail-Accounts nach Nordkorea-Hack

#Cyberangriffe #ITSicherheit #APT43 #Phrack #ProtonDrive #ProtonMail #protonmail #Thalium

This one stands out the most.
#phrack #hacktheplanet @phrack.org

Hacktivisme : Exposer les Hackers d’État Nord-Coréens Imaginez-vous tomber par hasard sur l’ordinateur d’un hacker travaillant pour un régime aussi mystérieux que celui de la Corée du Nord. C’est exactement ce qui est arrivé à deux hacktivistes, connus sous les pseudonymes de Saber et cyb0rg. Leur découverte n’est pas seulement une prouesse technique, mais un acte audacieux qui soulève des questions brûlantes […] The post Hacktivisme : Exposer les Hackers d’État Nord-Coréens first appeared on MondeTech.fr.

Original post on infosec.exchange

Weekend Reads

* Phrack #72
https://phrack.org/issues/72/1
* DNS at IETF 123
https://www.potaroo.net/ispcol/2025-08/dns_ietf123.html
* History of Hawaii subsea cables
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030...
* China GFW disrupted TCP 443 traffic […]

Original post on hackaday.com

This Week in Security: Anime Catgirls, Illegal AdBlock, and Disputed Research You may have noticed the Anime Catgirls when trying to get to the Linux Kernel’s mailing list, or one of any number o...

#Hackaday #Columns #Security #Hacks #catgirls #disputed […]

[Original post on hackaday.com]

Original post on hackaday.com

This Week in Security: Anime Catgirls, Illegal AdBlock, and Disputed Research You may have noticed the Anime Catgirls when trying to get to the Linux Kernel’s mailing list, or one of any number o...

#Hackaday #Columns #Security #Hacks #catgirls #disputed […]

[Original post on hackaday.com]

Original post on techcrunch.com

Hackers who exposed North Korean government hacker explain why they did it The two self-described hacktivists said they had access to the North Korean spy’s computer for around four months before...

#Security #hackers #hacking #North #Korea #cybersecurity […]

[Original post on techcrunch.com]