Dating in 2026 is kind of scary! Get a background check and know exactly who you are talking to with #spokeo!
www.spokeo.com?g=name_landi...
#peoplesearch #backgroundcheck #reversephonelookup
I looked up a house I rented a room in during college. Turns out Spokeo.com had me listed as a past resident, had my past contact information, and my current information.
If you are listed there you might be interested in their Opt Out form.
https://www.spokeo.com/optout
#Privacy #Spokeo
She told the CSR if that if was the best #Spokeo could do, she would be disputing this charge and sending it to the BoA Fraud dept. At this point, the CSR said they needed to "talk to their manager" to see. After putting her on hold they agreed to refund the other $29.95 we had been charged. 4/5
There were $29.95 charges made to our card on September 2nd and October 2nd, and #Spokeo agreed to refund them. Sounds great โ until I checked our most recent CC statement and find they only refunded one of these two charges! So we had to call back again. #enshittification 2/5
Screen capture of the Spokeo.com webpage sign-up for a $.95 full social report that automatically subscribes you into a $29.95 monthly membership.
Heads up for anyone who has had the misfortune of using #Spokeo. My wife used it in August for what she thought was a "one-time" check of an address, but upon review was a "free trial" for $.95. I caught this when reviewing our credit card statement, & she called to dispute this monthly charge. 1/5
Hey #Spokeo folks, check out this line: "Defendants read the Act as evincing an intention by the legislature to limit a plaintiffโs right to bring a cause of action to circumstances where he or she has sustained some actual damage...This construction is untenable."
From @JustinBrookman to @dispositive, @CenDemTech really called it on #Spokeo.
#Spokeo lives! Ninth Circuit Says FCRA Claims Meet Standing Bar:
Am I the only person excited to see how #Spokeo applies to the Video Privacy Protection Act? It's coming:
#Spokeo gives @DanielSolove a headache, and it's awesome:
#Spokeo tries to have its cake and eat it, too: "Bare procedural violations" won't cut it but "risk of real harm" can satisfy concreteness.
So doesn't read like #Spokeo is quite the death knell of harms based exclusively on statutory rights:
Interesting #Spokeo op-ed by @MasonLEC's James Cooper, but wonder how many want data brokers giving us better ads?