Lithuania’s ruling coalition holds despite mounting dispute over new training ground Lithuania’s governing coalition is expected to hold together despite mounting disagreements over plans to build a new military training ground in Kapciamiestis, leaders of the ruling parties, the SD.

Lithuania’s governing coalition is expected to hold together despite mounting disagreements over plans to build a new military training ground in Kapciamiestis, leaders of the ruling parties, the SD. Bne IntelliNews #Lithuania #Government #MilitaryTraining #CoalitionPolitics #Kapciamiestis

#ElectionMath #SpoilerEffect #SwingStates #ElectoralCollege #VoteSplitting #MarginsMatter #FirstPastThePost #TwoPartySystem #StrategicVoting #GameTheory #CloseRace #BattlegroundStates #PopularVote #Civics #CampaignStrategy #BallotBox #Democracy #Vote2026 #USPolitics #CoalitionPolitics #PluralityRule

#ElectionMath #SpoilerEffect #SwingStates #ElectoralCollege #VoteSplitting #MarginsMatter #FirstPastThePost #TwoPartySystem #StrategicVoting #GameTheory #CloseRace #BattlegroundStates #PopularVote #Civics #CampaignStrategy #BallotBox #Democracy #Vote2026 #USPolitics #CoalitionPolitics #PluralityRule

#ElectionMath #SpoilerEffect #SwingStates #ElectoralCollege #VoteSplitting #MarginsMatter #FirstPastThePost #TwoPartySystem #StrategicVoting #GameTheory #CloseRace #BattlegroundStates #PopularVote #Civics #CampaignStrategy #BallotBox #Democracy #Vote2026 #USPolitics #CoalitionPolitics #PluralityRule

#ElectionMath #SpoilerEffect #SwingStates #ElectoralCollege #VoteSplitting #MarginsMatter #FirstPastThePost #TwoPartySystem #StrategicVoting #GameTheory #CloseRace #BattlegroundStates #PopularVote #Civics #CampaignStrategy #BallotBox #Democracy #Vote2026 #USPolitics #CoalitionPolitics #PluralityRule

Jesse Jackson's 1988 'PATCHWORK QUILT' Speech From the 1988 Democratic National Convention...Jesse Jackson's brilliant 'patchwork quilt' speech... The good of our Nation is at stake. It’s commitment to working men and women, to the poor and the ...

Jackson warned that no single group’s “patch” is big enough alone. Today’s party still struggles with that truth. Coalition is the only path. 🤝🔥 #Democrats #CoalitionPolitics
www.canyoncountryzephyr.com/blog/2013/03...

#CoalitionPolitics #GovernanceRisk #DemocraticStress #PolicyShift #EnergySecurity #EconomicUncertainty #InflationImpact #WarInEurope #RussiaFactor #ChinaFactor #RiskIntelligence #GlobalThreats #2026Outlook #DutyOfCare #StrategicAnalysis #EarlyWarning

In the past three and a half decades, #Nepal has gone through seven waves of incomplete #politicaltransitions, followed by frequent regime changes and complex #coalitionpolitics, civil and political unrest, ultimately leading to a state of ‘certain uncertainty’.
#SouthAsia
icwa.in/pdfs/Tremors...

پی پی اتحادی ہے ہرموقع پر بھرپور ساتھ دیا، قدر کی نگاہ سے دیکھتےہيں وفاقی وزیراطلاعات عطا اللہ تارڑ،

#FederalInformationMinister #PPSupport #CoalitionPolitics #PakistanMatters

BasisPointInsight.com - Nitish Kumar's Tenth Ministry: Continuity, Caste Calculations, Gender and Regional Imbalances by Amitabh Tiwari The NDA’s new Bihar cabinet showcases stability at the top but uneven representation below — from caste arithmetic to gender gaps and regional imbalances. by Amitabh Tiwari, BasisPointInsight.com

4/5 With nine cabinet berths still vacant, the government has room to course-correct. But will the expansion address glaring gaps across communities and regions, or merely reinforce coalition compulsions?

#CoalitionPolitics

Their partnership signals a potential shift towards more balanced and progressive policies. #CoalitionPolitics

🌸 To appreciate this moment, let's delve into Japan's cultural and social context.

Komeito Party's sudden withdrawal of support for LDP fuels speculation of Chinese influence. 🤫 Some LDP members claim China orchestrated this to block Takaichi. #Komeito #LDP #CoalitionPolitics

[New Post]
Komeito's "Allergy" to Takaichi: Former Minister Nomura Warns of Coalition Rupture

#Komeito #Takaichi #CoalitionPolitics #JapanesePolitics mosmos-jp.blogspot.com/2025/10/komeitos-allergy...

Page 13 from the conference program with the sessions with the themes noted in this post listed. Access the program here: https://www.urbanhistory.org/resources/Documents/2025%20UHA%20Program%20-%2009-30.pdf

....sessions as diverse as those on the themes of
➤ #race, #place, and the #urban #environment
➤ engaging #communities on hot topics, like #climatechange #inequality and #urbanheat
➤ #Latinos, #Chicanos, and #CoalitionPolitics... and
➤ nineteenth-century #cityscapes

#UHA2025LA 2/4

To consolidate power, she's allied w/ veteran politician Taro Aso as LDP VP. 🤝 Aso's faction adds credibility, but also limits Takaichi's fiscal independence. Balance is key! ⚖️ #CoalitionPolitics #PowerPlay

3/5 He highlighted past instances (Mufti Sayeed & Mehbooba Mufti) of partnering w/ BJP citing regional representation, but rejects that rationale. 🗣️ #CoalitionPolitics #JandK

#CoalitionPolitics
#IdeologyMeetsReality
#BrooklynAndOhio
#RazorThinDemocracy

Image from image_1.jpg

Lebanon's Industry Minister Joe Issa Khoury said the "Duo" ministers' resignation isn't a reflection of personal views but a strategic move, highlighting a divide between personal beliefs and coalition politics.

#Lebanon #PoliticalDynamics #CoalitionPolitics

President Ramaphosa sacks Minister Nkabane after DA accusations of misconduct. Move aims to ease ANC-DA coalition tensions before key budget vote. DA had threatened disruption over corruption claims. #SouthAfrica #Ramaphosa #Nkabane #CoalitionPolitics #theworldpk

Romania’s new tax hikes face implementation risks amid coalition uncertainty, says Fitch Investing.com -- Romania’s efforts to reduce the European Union’s largest budget deficit through tax increases and spending cuts face significant implementation challenges due to its fragile coalition government, Fitch Ratings said Tuesday. The rating agency noted that the stability of the four-party coalition led by Liberal Prime Minister Ilie Bolojan will be crucial for implementing fiscal consolidation measures and will influence Romania’s credit ratings. Romania experienced political instability following a presidential election that was cancelled in December and rescheduled for May. This extended election cycle contributed to market turmoil that increased borrowing costs and weakened the leu currency. The political uncertainty pushed Romania’s budget deficit above 9% of economic output last year, raising concerns about a potential downgrade to below investment grade. Financial markets stabilized in late June when the new coalition government announced a series of tax increases. However, the coalition parties have shown reluctance to implement these unpopular fiscal measures, which have drawn criticism from unions and employers while triggering protests from public sector workers. Adding to the uncertainty, the coalition agreement includes a provision for Bolojan to be replaced by a prime minister from the center-left Social Democrats in 2027, before parliamentary elections in 2028. The two largest parties already disagree on income tax policy. "Significant fiscal consolidation will weigh on economic growth, and implementation risks cannot be discounted," Fitch stated. The government plans to increase value-added tax, excise duties, dividend levies, and taxes on bank turnover, with some measures taking effect in August and others in January. These changes are expected to have a budget impact of 1.1% of output this year and 3.5% in 2026. This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C. AI computing powers are changing the stock market. Investing.com's ProPicks AI includes 6 winning stock portfolios chosen by our advanced AI. In 2024 alone, ProPicks AI identified 2 stocks that surged over 150%, 4 additional stocks that leaped over 30%, and 3 more that climbed over 25%. Which stock will be the next to soar?

Click Subscribe. #Romania #TaxHikes #FitchRatings #EconomicNews #CoalitionPolitics

South Africa’s DA party quit the national talks but stayed in the coalition after Ramaphosa fired its deputy minister, causing more tension.
#SouthAfrica #DA #Ramaphosa #CoalitionPolitics #BreakingNews #PoliticalCrisis #Government

Imagine watching the mess in US. Imagine despite that there are idiots who’ll vote for Farage.
#CoalitionPolitics
#SNP
#PlaidCymru
#Greens

No contracts, no clarity – almost a year of the GNU and still no ministerial scorecards As the first anniversary of the Government of National Unity draws near, ministerial performance agreements have yet to materialise. South Africa’s 10-party coalition turns one this month, but signed ministerial performance agreements – an important accountability tool – are still nowhere in sight. However, the Presidency says the work of government is not hampered by the absence of performance agreements.  “The process is under way and remains between the President and the concerned members of Cabinet. There are enough public accountability measures through Parliament when APPs (annual performance plans) are presented and assessed,” Presidency spokesperson Vincent Magwenya told Daily Maverick this week.  Read more: 100 days of the GNU and not a ministerial performance contract in sight In a response to Parliament in August 2024, President Cyril Ramaphosa said Cabinet ministers would only sign performance contracts once the 2024-29 Medium-Term Development Plan, which outlines the key priorities for the seventh administration, had been approved.  The Medium-Term Development Plan was approved by the Cabinet in February, but ministers’ performance agreements still seem some way off.  President Cyril Ramaphosa appointed a bloated Cabinet and executive (32 ministers and 44 deputy ministers) to accommodate the parties in the Government of National Unity (GNU). The GNU Statement of Intent outlines the gargantuan government’s agenda and strategic priorities. But, as Bhaso Ndzende, an associate professor of politics and international relations at the University of Johannesburg, wrote, exactly how each minister is to contribute to the realisation of these priorities is unclear in the absence of performance agreements.  Previously, the ministerial performance agreements of the sixth administration were based on the 2019-2024 Medium-Term Strategic Framework, and ran from June 2019 to April 2024. But most of the agreements were signed only in late 2020.  In his 2020 State of the Nation Address, Ramaphosa pledged to publish the agreements online, in an attempt at transparency. However, progress on those agreements was never made public.  It’s unclear whether the President will choose to make the performance agreements of the current administration public. Political analyst Professor Susan Booysen, says it could be a gamble so close to the 2026 local government elections.  Booysen, however, said she regards ministerial performance agreements to be “extremely important”.   “They can be a great accountability tool, not just internally for the ANC – and that would’ve been in times when it was just the ANC in power – but also now, in times of coalition. It would really help specify what the exact expectations are [and] what the exact permissions,” she said.  Booysen said these agreements would define what was expected of each minister and what each minister was allowed to do. This is crucial because there have already been tensions and disagreements between coalition partners over responsibilities, with ministers being accused of overstepping or claiming credit for work started before their time, she said.  “We have seen that kind of acrimonious exchange happening, and a performance agreement would help spell out in exact details what it is that the expectations and requirements are,” she said.  DA spokesperson Willie Aucamp told Daily Maverick that “there [haven’t] been any targets that have been set”.  “We believe, from the DA’s side, that it is very important to get targets set. You must have measurables to be measured on,” he said.  Aucamp said the DA supported making the contracts public, for South Africans to assess the work of the executive. “Should the President not make [them] public, the ministers from the DA will make their targets public, as well as the achievement thereon,” he said.  The Inkatha Freedom Party (IFP), Good and the Freedom Front Plus (FF Plus) told Daily Maverick they would support the publication of the performance contracts.  IFP national spokesperson and Deputy Minister for Transport Mkhuleko Hlengwa described performance contracts as “important tools to measure performances against the desired and set targets”.  “The IFP ministers and deputy ministers are visibly hard at work with or without the performance agreements because they know the commitments and the agreements they made with the voters,” he said.  Good’s secretary-general Brett Herron said the party “fully [supports] meaningful performance agreements for members of the executive” and expected them to be “concluded soon” given that the Medium-Term Development Plan had been adopted and the Budget had been tabled in Parliament.  He said: “We must remember that the GNU Cabinet was appointed in June 2024 – thus the executive has really been implementing the final few months of the previous term of office’s performance plans. The delay in finalising the performance agreements is somewhat explicable in this context, though it is reasonable for the South African public to expect performance agreements to be wrapped up now and ready for signature – now that we have a governing programme and hopefully a Medium Term Budget to implement it.” However, Wouter Wessels, MP and national spokesperson for the FF Plus, said the party believed the finalising of ministerial performance agreements was taking too long.  “We do believe that performance agreements are an important component of accountability. Ministerial performance is, however, not solely dependent on such agreements… The conclusion of these agreements [is] taking much too long. We believe this should be expedited,” he told Daily Maverick.  On whether to make them public, Wessels said: “There is no need to keep such agreements secret.” “Effective accountability can only take place in the presence of transparency,” he said. DM The post No contracts, no clarity – almost a year of the GNU and still no ministerial scorecards appeared first on The Namibian.

#GovernmentAccountability #CoalitionPolitics #MinisterialPerformance #PublicAccountability #SouthAfrica

Image from image_1.jpg

A large protest in Madrid, led by Podemos, IU, and Sumar, opposed the Spanish government's proposed defense spending increases, citing coalition tensions and pressure from NATO. Despite public support, divisions persist ahead of the NATO summit.

#Spain #DefenseSpending #CoalitionPolitics

GOOD’s Brett Herron joins #DemocracyUnplugged to unpack the GNU-one year on. Coalition of hope or collision course?

Hosted by @PodcastPartySA. Watch this space!

🎧 https://youtube.com/@podcastpartysa?si=vENewhmv6LjGmHZi

#GOODParty #ForGOOD #GNU #CoalitionPolitics #DemocracyUnplugged @

नेपाल में गहराती अस्थिरता: संघर्ष, चुनौतियाँ एवं संभावनाएं - Indian Council of World Affairs (Government of India) ICWA

यह विशेष प्रतिवदेन #नेपाल में राजनीतिक स्थिरता, आर्थिक सुदृढ़ीकरण एवं संवैधानिक संशोधन के मुद्दे को केंद्र में रखते हुए वर्तमान गठबंधन सरकार के संघर्ष, चुनौतियाँ एवं संभावनाओं के विश्लेषण करने का प्रयास करता है।
#Nepal #Instability #PoliticalInstability #EconomicStability #ConstitutionalAmendments #Reform #CoalitionPolitics #Protests
www.icwa.in/show_content...

The united front is crumbling. Long-standing alliances within conservative circles are showing critical stress fractures as competing ideologies and priorities clash. What was once a cohesive political movement now reveals deepening fault lines, with traditional conservatives, populists, and extremist factions increasingly at odds. These tensions aren't merely philosophical disagreements but fundamental conflicts over vision, tactics, and core values. As internal power struggles intensify, the coalition that once moved in lockstep is now marching to different drummers, creating openings that opponents could exploit and reshaping the political landscape in profound ways. #RightWingFractures #ConservativeDivision #PoliticalInfighting #CoalitionCracks #IdeologicalClash #PopulismVsConservatism #PowerStruggles #PoliticalRealignment #ConservativeConflict #ShiftingPolitics #PoliticalFaultLines #RightWingTensions #FracturedRight #PoliticalLandscape #CoalitionPolitics

#RightWingFractures #ConservativeDivision #PoliticalInfighting #CoalitionCracks #IdeologicalClash #PopulismVsConservatism #PowerStruggles #PoliticalRealignment #ConservativeConflict #ShiftingPolitics #PoliticalFaultLines #RightWingTensions #FracturedRight #PoliticalLandscape #CoalitionPolitics

GNU 2.0 — ANC presses ‘Control-Alt-Delete’ on the national coalition The decision by the ANC’s National Working Committee to ‘reset’ the national coalition opens the door to real change in the government. It can also lead to turmoil in the ANC. There can be no underestimating the depth of feeling among ANC leaders about the DA. During his press conference on Tuesday, the ANC secretary-general, Fikile Mbalula, accused the DA of lying and said the party wanted to “divide government and confuse the public”. This has been matched by some of the DA’s public comments, which have been insulting to the ANC. Both parties have — unnecessarily — been antagonising each other. As previously mentioned, it’s an indication of how little our politics has changed in the months since last year’s elections. Mbalula said the ANC would use the next five days and the negotiations about the Budget to speak to parties in the coalition and outside of the coalition. It seems as if the ANC has turned the clock back to the period immediately after last year’s elections, when parties had just 14 days to decide whether to join the coalition. It was a time pregnant with possibility, when anything could happen. A similar scenario is playing out now, except that what happened during those last coalition negotiations might well inform what happens this time around. Read more: ANC’s fallout with DA escalates as Ramaphosa pushes back on business pressure Last year, MK and the EFF made it clear they would not work with the ANC while Cyril Ramaphosa was President, which forced the ANC to stop negotiating with them. Working with former president Jacob Zuma’s MK is probably still a stretch too far for the ANC, but the EFF may change its approach, with its leader, Julius Malema, seeking a return to the spotlight after losing some power and influence. While that would be bad for the ANC in the longer run, some people in the party, including Deputy President Paul Mashatile, appear keener to work with the EFF than the DA. However, Mbalula confirmed at Tuesday’s press conference that the ANC had asked Malema to tell his party to abstain from last week’s vote on the fiscal framework and that he refused. As News24 reported, Mbalula went further, saying that the EFF voted with the DA because it wanted “to remove the ANC surgically”. This could lead to some in the ANC arguing against the inclusion of the EFF in the coalition government. ANC’s options  The question of who to include and who to exclude is intertwined with the ANC’s leadership question and its elective conference in December 2027. This is surely one of the reasons Mashatile has been so publicly assertive in recent days. If he prevails and removes the DA from the coalition, then he and his followers would be strengthened and Ramaphosa, should he remain in office, would be fundamentally weakened. Of course, were the EFF and MK to successfully reiterate their demand that Ramaphosa leave office, that would change the nature of the government completely. However, if the DA ends up back in the coalition, even under different conditions, it would indicate there is no broad support within the ANC for Mashatile and his views. Those tasked with managing the ANC face big problems with potentially devastating consequences. It was often remarked in the days after the formation of the national coalition last year that there had not been a substantive debate in ANC structures about who to work with and who to avoid. While this was mainly because of the time pressure (the Constitution only gives Parliament 14 days to elect a president after the proclamation of the election), it also meant that a messy internal debate was avoided. Bluntly, if the ANC had to consult all of its structures and members on whether it should work with the DA, the EFF or MK, the debate could continue forever — it would be very damaging to allow this conversation to get out of hand. This might be one of the reasons the ANC has given itself just five days to manage the situation. While part of that may be because of the timetable of the Budget process, it seems impossible to manage this in just five days, and the process is likely to be extended. Another risk is that the ANC brings new partners to government who are much more successful at undermining the ANC than the DA has tried to be. Malema and Zuma have shown themselves to be capable of undermining the ANC from within. Having them or their representatives in the Cabinet would allow them to do this much more effectively. Read more: Maimane advocates for unity: Bosa seeks collaboration to reverse VAT hike and foster growth DA’s dilemma The DA has to make important decisions. It is still not clear why its leader, John Steenhuisen, decided that VAT was the hill on which he was prepared to allow the coalition to die. While the DA’s frustration with the ANC was understandable (as was the ANC’s frustration with the DA), and VAT would hurt poorer people, it was still a strange fight to pick. Now, the DA has to decide whether to effectively concede it was wrong (and possibly even accept a reduced role in the coalition, with fewer Cabinet posts) or to stay outside. Read more: DA says it is ‘willing to speak to ANC to get a workable Budget on the table’ This can divide the DA, as it is clear from the public comments of some of its members that they do not want to work with the ANC. The events of the last three weeks raise questions about Steenhuisen’s judgment and whether he has the strategic grasp necessary to manage this complex situation. Opportunity for stability However, it is also possible that this “reset” will lead to a much more productive coalition. Mbalula said on Tuesday that the coalition “must be governed by rules” and not just the statement of intent. This reveals that he and the ANC have (correctly) diagnosed one of the major problems with the coalition: it did not have proper dispute resolution mechanisms. While the original statement of intent was drawn up under intense time pressure, there appeared to be no appetite on the part of either the ANC or the DA to craft something more substantive after it was signed. Long before last year’s election, many experts pointed out that the chances of a coalition succeeding would be much higher if there was a binding coalition agreement. Mbalula is correct that a coalition must be “governed by rules”. This could open the window to a coalition that has an agreement — “rules” — that will guide it through disputes. That is the very narrow silver lining of this situation. Our politics is again in an uncertain space. The next few days will see comments from parties that might well be inconsistent with each other. However, the fundamental interests of the various parties remain the same. For the ANC and the DA, despite their obvious differences and the high emotions of the moment, the longer-term interest of governing in a broad moderate coalition might still override everything else. DM The post GNU 2.0 — ANC presses ‘Control-Alt-Delete’ on the national coalition appeared first on The Namibian.

#ANC #CoalitionPolitics #SouthAfrica #PoliticalChange #DA

GNU 2.0 — ANC presses ‘Control-Alt-Delete’ on the national coalition The decision by the ANC’s National Working Committee to ‘reset’ the national coalition opens the door to real change in the government. It can also lead to turmoil in the ANC. There can be no underestimating the depth of feeling among ANC leaders about the DA. During his press conference on Tuesday, the ANC secretary-general, Fikile Mbalula, accused the DA of lying and said the party wanted to “divide government and confuse the public”. This has been matched by some of the DA’s public comments, which have been insulting to the ANC. Both parties have — unnecessarily — been antagonising each other. As previously mentioned, it’s an indication of how little our politics has changed in the months since last year’s elections. Mbalula said the ANC would use the next five days and the negotiations about the Budget to speak to parties in the coalition and outside of the coalition. It seems as if the ANC has turned the clock back to the period immediately after last year’s elections, when parties had just 14 days to decide whether to join the coalition. It was a time pregnant with possibility, when anything could happen. A similar scenario is playing out now, except that what happened during those last coalition negotiations might well inform what happens this time around. Read more: ANC’s fallout with DA escalates as Ramaphosa pushes back on business pressure Last year, MK and the EFF made it clear they would not work with the ANC while Cyril Ramaphosa was President, which forced the ANC to stop negotiating with them. Working with former president Jacob Zuma’s MK is probably still a stretch too far for the ANC, but the EFF may change its approach, with its leader, Julius Malema, seeking a return to the spotlight after losing some power and influence. While that would be bad for the ANC in the longer run, some people in the party, including Deputy President Paul Mashatile, appear keener to work with the EFF than the DA. However, Mbalula confirmed at Tuesday’s press conference that the ANC had asked Malema to tell his party to abstain from last week’s vote on the fiscal framework and that he refused. As News24 reported, Mbalula went further, saying that the EFF voted with the DA because it wanted “to remove the ANC surgically”. This could lead to some in the ANC arguing against the inclusion of the EFF in the coalition government. ANC’s options  The question of who to include and who to exclude is intertwined with the ANC’s leadership question and its elective conference in December 2027. This is surely one of the reasons Mashatile has been so publicly assertive in recent days. If he prevails and removes the DA from the coalition, then he and his followers would be strengthened and Ramaphosa, should he remain in office, would be fundamentally weakened. Of course, were the EFF and MK to successfully reiterate their demand that Ramaphosa leave office, that would change the nature of the government completely. However, if the DA ends up back in the coalition, even under different conditions, it would indicate there is no broad support within the ANC for Mashatile and his views. Those tasked with managing the ANC face big problems with potentially devastating consequences. It was often remarked in the days after the formation of the national coalition last year that there had not been a substantive debate in ANC structures about who to work with and who to avoid. While this was mainly because of the time pressure (the Constitution only gives Parliament 14 days to elect a president after the proclamation of the election), it also meant that a messy internal debate was avoided. Bluntly, if the ANC had to consult all of its structures and members on whether it should work with the DA, the EFF or MK, the debate could continue forever — it would be very damaging to allow this conversation to get out of hand. This might be one of the reasons the ANC has given itself just five days to manage the situation. While part of that may be because of the timetable of the Budget process, it seems impossible to manage this in just five days, and the process is likely to be extended. Another risk is that the ANC brings new partners to government who are much more successful at undermining the ANC than the DA has tried to be. Malema and Zuma have shown themselves to be capable of undermining the ANC from within. Having them or their representatives in the Cabinet would allow them to do this much more effectively. Read more: Maimane advocates for unity: Bosa seeks collaboration to reverse VAT hike and foster growth DA’s dilemma The DA has to make important decisions. It is still not clear why its leader, John Steenhuisen, decided that VAT was the hill on which he was prepared to allow the coalition to die. While the DA’s frustration with the ANC was understandable (as was the ANC’s frustration with the DA), and VAT would hurt poorer people, it was still a strange fight to pick. Now, the DA has to decide whether to effectively concede it was wrong (and possibly even accept a reduced role in the coalition, with fewer Cabinet posts) or to stay outside. Read more: DA says it is ‘willing to speak to ANC to get a workable Budget on the table’ This can divide the DA, as it is clear from the public comments of some of its members that they do not want to work with the ANC. The events of the last three weeks raise questions about Steenhuisen’s judgment and whether he has the strategic grasp necessary to manage this complex situation. Opportunity for stability However, it is also possible that this “reset” will lead to a much more productive coalition. Mbalula said on Tuesday that the coalition “must be governed by rules” and not just the statement of intent. This reveals that he and the ANC have (correctly) diagnosed one of the major problems with the coalition: it did not have proper dispute resolution mechanisms. While the original statement of intent was drawn up under intense time pressure, there appeared to be no appetite on the part of either the ANC or the DA to craft something more substantive after it was signed. Long before last year’s election, many experts pointed out that the chances of a coalition succeeding would be much higher if there was a binding coalition agreement. Mbalula is correct that a coalition must be “governed by rules”. This could open the window to a coalition that has an agreement — “rules” — that will guide it through disputes. That is the very narrow silver lining of this situation. Our politics is again in an uncertain space. The next few days will see comments from parties that might well be inconsistent with each other. However, the fundamental interests of the various parties remain the same. For the ANC and the DA, despite their obvious differences and the high emotions of the moment, the longer-term interest of governing in a broad moderate coalition might still override everything else. DM The post GNU 2.0 — ANC presses ‘Control-Alt-Delete’ on the national coalition appeared first on The Namibian.

#ANC #CoalitionPolitics #SouthAfrica #PoliticalChange #DA

A formal split of the Democratic Party into smaller third parties—such as neoliberals, progressives, and social democrats—could reshape the American political landscape by fostering a coalition-based system that incentivizes compromise over infighting. Rather than internal battles deciding which wing dominates the party, each faction would compete openly on its own platform while still cooperating in broader governing coalitions. This structure could have prevented the sidelining of widely popular figures like Bernie Sanders in 2016, an event that alienated many voters and dampened Democratic turnout in critical elections. By creating space for more authentic representation, such a system could re-energize disillusioned voters. Furthermore, this multiparty dynamic might pressure the Republican Party to undergo a similar transformation, splitting the MAGA wing from more traditional conservatives. In turn, the disproportionate national influence of MAGA extremism could be curbed, encouraging governance through negotiation and mutual accountability rather than ideological domination.

Before-the-vote coalitions work—in Canada, India, the UK, Kenya, even the anti-slavery bloc that birthed the GOP. Multiparty alliances in First-Past-the-Post (FPTP) systems can reflect real lives, not just binary labels. #CoalitionPolitics #ElectoralReform #MultipartyDemocracy #DemocracyForAll