0
0
0
0
Hashtag
#Rescind
Advertisement · 728 × 90
![[The Great War & Modern Memory]](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/avatar/plain/did:plc:54sd6bipe7inusth2cgvlcc4/bafkreidnyt2oxqzjc2wllgsri4lhrohpdqdstk4yrtl4smltawlsesemcy)
🚨Breaking News: The House voted to #rescind #tariffs Trump imposed on #Canada last year, delivering a #symbolic but politically #consequential rebuke that Republicans had fought for a year to prevent. #Six #Republicans joined nearly all #Democrats in backing the #resolution.
3
2
0
2
#RESCIND the $ given to them in the BigBadBill
0
0
0
0
Threatening children is a no-go.
#Rescind.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
#Rescind all funding now‼️‼️‼️
bsky.app/profile/vict...
0
0
0
0
#Rescind all funding.
1
0
0
0
If you are pushing third party to divide the vote, please remove my profile from your feed.
Basic common sense to #Rescind funding for violent masked and armed lawless groups masquerading as part of a US department of " Homeland Security " is not limited to
" progressives ". This is the entire US.
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
#Rescind the funding for military aggression.
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
Yes! #Rescind it all! ASAP. That would make America Great Again
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1/2 📣👥🇺🇲 ...policies being protested are the Trump's attempts to #rescind collective bargaining #rights from 1 million federal workers, the largest single act of #unionbusting in US history,
a #cut to #minimum #wage requirements for federal contractors...cont.
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...
1
0
1
0
Goody. More strongly-worded letters.
Gavin Newsom:
The National Guard's deployment was #unlawful & called on the Drumpf Cartel to #rescind its order in a letter Sunday afternoon
www.aol.com/national-gua...
3
1
0
0
🚨Breaking News: Gov. Gavin #Newsom asked Pete #Hegseth, the defense secretary, to #rescind the National Guard deployment in L.A., calling it a “breach of state #sovereignty.” Follow live updates.
0
0
0
0
Governor Gavin Newsom & @CAgovernor I have formally requested the Trump Administration rescind their unlawful deployment of troops in Los Angeles county and return them to my command. We didn't have a problem until Trump got involved. This is a serious breach of state sovereignty — inflaming tensions while pulling resources from where they're actually needed. Rescind the order. Return control to California.
![OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
June 8, 2025
Hon. Pete Hegseth
Secretary of Defense Washington, DC 20301
Via email only
Re: Federalization of the California National Guard
Dear Secretary Hegseth:
On June 7, 2025, President Trump issued a memorandum to your office entitled "Department of Defense Security for the Protection of Department of Homeland Security Functions." The memorandum purports to invoke 10 U.S.C.§ 12406 to "call into Federal service members and units of the National Guard ... to temporarily protect ICE and other United States Government personnel who are performing Federal functions, including the enforcement of Federal law, and to protect Federal property." The memorandum further directs "actions as necessary for the Secretary of Defense to coordinate with the Governors of the States and the National Guard Bureau in identifying and ordering into Federal service the appropriate members and units of the National Guard under this authority."
Section 12406 states that "the President may call into Federal service members and units of the National Guard of any State in such numbers as he considers necessary" to (1) repel an invasion of the United States by a foreign nation; (2) suppress a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States; or (3) execute the laws of the United States when the President is unable to do so with regular forces. Section 12406 further states that "[o]rders for these purposes shall be issued through the governors of the States."
Last night, the Adjutant General of California received a memorandum from your office with the subject line "Calling Members of the California National Guard](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:vwajgkd45f5damhlwimo3bom/bafkreigyd4t6dkuoxepkslwgfbeyv2rkk3g3wlvvrz7ocyv5o6eqbicjjy)
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR June 8, 2025 Hon. Pete Hegseth Secretary of Defense Washington, DC 20301 Via email only Re: Federalization of the California National Guard Dear Secretary Hegseth: On June 7, 2025, President Trump issued a memorandum to your office entitled "Department of Defense Security for the Protection of Department of Homeland Security Functions." The memorandum purports to invoke 10 U.S.C.§ 12406 to "call into Federal service members and units of the National Guard ... to temporarily protect ICE and other United States Government personnel who are performing Federal functions, including the enforcement of Federal law, and to protect Federal property." The memorandum further directs "actions as necessary for the Secretary of Defense to coordinate with the Governors of the States and the National Guard Bureau in identifying and ordering into Federal service the appropriate members and units of the National Guard under this authority." Section 12406 states that "the President may call into Federal service members and units of the National Guard of any State in such numbers as he considers necessary" to (1) repel an invasion of the United States by a foreign nation; (2) suppress a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States; or (3) execute the laws of the United States when the President is unable to do so with regular forces. Section 12406 further states that "[o]rders for these purposes shall be issued through the governors of the States." Last night, the Adjutant General of California received a memorandum from your office with the subject line "Calling Members of the California National Guard
![Guard into Federal Service," which states that "[t]wo thousand members of the California National Guard will be called into Federal service effective immediately for a period of 60 days." Notably, this directive did not issue
"through the governor|] of the State[]" as required by section 12406; the Department of Defense did not transmit this directive to the Office of the Governor, nor was it approved or ordered by the Governor of California. This directive is also inconsistent with the President's memorandum, which anticipates "coordination] with the Governors of the States" in identifying and ordering units of the National Guard into federal service.
At present, law enforcement authorities from the City and County of Los
Angeles are safeguarding public safety, and, as demonstrated by the robust law enforcement response yesterday evening to protect federal facilities, local law enforcement resources are sufficient to maintain order. In dynamic and fluid situations such as the one in Los Angeles, State and local authorities are the most appropriate ones to evaluate the need for resources to safeguard life and property. Indeed, the decision to deploy the National Guard, without appropriate training or orders, risks seriously escalating the situation.
There is currently no need for the National Guard to be deployed in Los Angeles, and to do so in this unlawful manner and for such a lengthy period is a serious breach of state sovereignty that seems intentionally designed to inflame the situation, while simultaneously depriving the State from deploying these personnel and resources where they are truly required. Accordingly, we ask that you immediately rescind your order and return the National Guard to its rightful control by the State of California, to be deployed as appropriate when necessary.
Sincerely,
Saud Do
David Sapp
Legal Affairs Secretary
Office of Governor Gavin Newsom
CC: California Attorney General Rob Bonta (via email only)
2](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:vwajgkd45f5damhlwimo3bom/bafkreigkkkx7fu6khvtwtb7gm7yexlbwetuzgpta2f4ghvs6abf7qdjime)
Guard into Federal Service," which states that "[t]wo thousand members of the California National Guard will be called into Federal service effective immediately for a period of 60 days." Notably, this directive did not issue "through the governor|] of the State[]" as required by section 12406; the Department of Defense did not transmit this directive to the Office of the Governor, nor was it approved or ordered by the Governor of California. This directive is also inconsistent with the President's memorandum, which anticipates "coordination] with the Governors of the States" in identifying and ordering units of the National Guard into federal service. At present, law enforcement authorities from the City and County of Los Angeles are safeguarding public safety, and, as demonstrated by the robust law enforcement response yesterday evening to protect federal facilities, local law enforcement resources are sufficient to maintain order. In dynamic and fluid situations such as the one in Los Angeles, State and local authorities are the most appropriate ones to evaluate the need for resources to safeguard life and property. Indeed, the decision to deploy the National Guard, without appropriate training or orders, risks seriously escalating the situation. There is currently no need for the National Guard to be deployed in Los Angeles, and to do so in this unlawful manner and for such a lengthy period is a serious breach of state sovereignty that seems intentionally designed to inflame the situation, while simultaneously depriving the State from deploying these personnel and resources where they are truly required. Accordingly, we ask that you immediately rescind your order and return the National Guard to its rightful control by the State of California, to be deployed as appropriate when necessary. Sincerely, Saud Do David Sapp Legal Affairs Secretary Office of Governor Gavin Newsom CC: California Attorney General Rob Bonta (via email only) 2
#California Governor Newsom has formally requested the Trump Administration #rescind their unlawful #deployment of troops in #LosAngeles county and return them to his command.
30
15
0
0
Can SCOTUS #rescind or #remediate their "Presidential Immunity" ruling? It is apparent that this POTUS has no taste for the rule of law, unless it's written by him, or to his benefit. Do you believe SCOTUS has seen the errors of their ways? And do you feel SCOTUS is now as impotent as Congress?
0
0
0
0
I’m ready to erase the very existence of this 🍊stain from our history books, who agrees?
#Reverse
#Revoke
#Rescind
0
0
0
0
#SCOTUS Should #rescind #Trump's #PresidentialImmunity...
End of story!!
1
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
Let me help you make that decision. #rescind
1
0
1
0