Advertisement · 728 × 90
#
Hashtag
#WomensVotes
Advertisement · 728 × 90

Rolling back women's rights is a longstanding American tradition. #UShistory #internationalwomensday #newjersey #womensvotes #suffrage

9 7 0 0
Post image

... your Vote is worth protecting!!!!! Keep pushin'.!! ----

Your Vote = your democracy

#womensVotes #WomenVoter #NewVoters #Vote #vota

1 1 0 0
Women's March for Justice, for the Epstein Survivors. And more-----, like hello Senstors,  a giant NO to Save Act! Please call & email your your senators to say NO to the Save Act.

Women's March for Justice, for the Epstein Survivors. And more-----, like hello Senstors, a giant NO to Save Act! Please call & email your your senators to say NO to the Save Act.

... #WomensMarch... & mire ( like a call & email to iyr senators, for a giant NO to the stupidly named: Save Act, that's trying to take away Women's Votes.
#voto #vota #votando #vote #voter #voting #womensVote #womensVotes

1 1 0 0

If this passes you need a VALID PASSPORT to even vote. Like not bc enough people in abject poverty are deterred ...
Middle class Americans cannot afford this and if you have been married or a Name change it is a whole mess.
STEALING WOMEN'S VOTES
#RIGHTTOVOTE #WOMENSVOTES #SAVEACTBULLSHIT

0 0 0 0
Video

🚨
#SaveAct
#VotingRights
#WomensVotes
#TransRights

Remember: NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION 🙃
@senatedemocrats.bsky.social
@housedemocrats.bsky.social

0 0 1 0
Preview
Voter Turnout by Sex and Age Voter Turnout by Sex and Age.

#Canadian #WOMEN hold the biggest voting base‼️

Across Canada, #women 13,647,077
Compared to #men
13,161,866

Make sure you ask #Candidates about the issues important to you and ensure that #women’svoices are #equal parts of their platforms. #WomensVoteS
#cdnpoli

www.elections.ca/content.aspx...

19 7 0 0
Will the SAVE Act Disenfranchise Millions of Voters?

The claim in the image about the SAVE Act potentially disenfranchising 69 million women voters appears to be based on concerns regarding the bill's stringent voter registration requirements. The SAVE Act mandates that individuals provide documentary proof of U.S. citizenship, such as a passport or birth certificate, to register to vote in federal elections. This requirement poses challenges for married women who have changed their legal names after marriage, as their birth certificates may not match their current legal names. Approximately 69 million married women in the U.S. could face difficulties under this provision[2][4][5].

Additionally, the act would require voters to present these documents in person, effectively eliminating online, automatic, and mail-in voter registration options. This could disproportionately impact groups with less access to such documentation, including women, trans individuals, low-income citizens, and racial minorities[4][6]. Critics argue that these measures amount to voter suppression rather than addressing voter fraud, which is already illegal and rare[4][6].

Will the SAVE Act Disenfranchise Millions of Voters? The claim in the image about the SAVE Act potentially disenfranchising 69 million women voters appears to be based on concerns regarding the bill's stringent voter registration requirements. The SAVE Act mandates that individuals provide documentary proof of U.S. citizenship, such as a passport or birth certificate, to register to vote in federal elections. This requirement poses challenges for married women who have changed their legal names after marriage, as their birth certificates may not match their current legal names. Approximately 69 million married women in the U.S. could face difficulties under this provision[2][4][5]. Additionally, the act would require voters to present these documents in person, effectively eliminating online, automatic, and mail-in voter registration options. This could disproportionately impact groups with less access to such documentation, including women, trans individuals, low-income citizens, and racial minorities[4][6]. Critics argue that these measures amount to voter suppression rather than addressing voter fraud, which is already illegal and rare[4][6].

While the claim that "the press is not covering this" is inaccurate—numerous outlets have reported on the SAVE Act's implications—it is true that the legislation has sparked significant concerns about its potential impact on voting accessibility for millions of Americans[3][5][6].

Citations:
[1] https://pplx-res.cloudinary.com/image/upload/v1743539503/user_uploads/wVoWqWVQalCcBqq/Screenshot_20250401_163105_Tribel.jpg
[2] https://www.ncsl.org/resources/details/9-things-to-know-about-the-proposed-save-act
[3] https://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2025-03-31/save-act-voting-rights-republicans
[4] https://nwlc.org/how-the-save-act-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-married-women-and-trans-voters/
[5] https://www.newsweek.com/married-women-stopped-voting-save-act-2029325
[6] https://msmagazine.com/2025/03/26/save-act-voting-rights-women-trans-voters-elections/
[7] https://www.cbsnews.com/news/save-act-voter-registration-citizenship-married-women-name-change/
[8] https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2025/03/04/save-act-prevent-married-women-voting/81200611007/
[9] https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/voting-rights-act-60-congress-could-hit-new-low-save-act
[10] https://www.yahoo.com/news/save-act-may-affect-registering-001000874.html
[11] https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-save-act-an-attempt-to-restrict-voting-rights/
[12] https://19thnews.org/2025/03/save-act-voting-married-women/
[13] https://my.lwv.org/pennsylvania/central-delaware-county/article/save-act-photo-id-bill-could-disenfranchise-millions-american-women-poor
[14] https://democraticwomenscaucus.house.gov/media/press-releases/democratic-womens-caucus-demands-speaker-johnson-scrap-save-act-legislation
[15] https://civilrights.org/2025/03/31/watch-civil-rights-leaders-and-impacted-voters-speak-in-opposition-to-the-save-act/

While the claim that "the press is not covering this" is inaccurate—numerous outlets have reported on the SAVE Act's implications—it is true that the legislation has sparked significant concerns about its potential impact on voting accessibility for millions of Americans[3][5][6]. Citations: [1] https://pplx-res.cloudinary.com/image/upload/v1743539503/user_uploads/wVoWqWVQalCcBqq/Screenshot_20250401_163105_Tribel.jpg [2] https://www.ncsl.org/resources/details/9-things-to-know-about-the-proposed-save-act [3] https://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2025-03-31/save-act-voting-rights-republicans [4] https://nwlc.org/how-the-save-act-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-married-women-and-trans-voters/ [5] https://www.newsweek.com/married-women-stopped-voting-save-act-2029325 [6] https://msmagazine.com/2025/03/26/save-act-voting-rights-women-trans-voters-elections/ [7] https://www.cbsnews.com/news/save-act-voter-registration-citizenship-married-women-name-change/ [8] https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2025/03/04/save-act-prevent-married-women-voting/81200611007/ [9] https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/voting-rights-act-60-congress-could-hit-new-low-save-act [10] https://www.yahoo.com/news/save-act-may-affect-registering-001000874.html [11] https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-save-act-an-attempt-to-restrict-voting-rights/ [12] https://19thnews.org/2025/03/save-act-voting-married-women/ [13] https://my.lwv.org/pennsylvania/central-delaware-county/article/save-act-photo-id-bill-could-disenfranchise-millions-american-women-poor [14] https://democraticwomenscaucus.house.gov/media/press-releases/democratic-womens-caucus-demands-speaker-johnson-scrap-save-act-legislation [15] https://civilrights.org/2025/03/31/watch-civil-rights-leaders-and-impacted-voters-speak-in-opposition-to-the-save-act/

[16] https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/letter-congress-opposing-save-act
[17] https://my.lwv.org/ohio/oxford/action-alert/stop-save-act
[18] https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/22
[19] https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/voting-rights-groups-challenge-trumps-recent-executive-order
[20] https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-save-act-would-disenfranchise-millions-of-citizens/
[21] https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/128/text/is
[22] https://www.lwv.org/blog/safeguard-american-voter-eligibility-save-act-trick
[23] https://www.factcheck.org/2025/02/will-save-act-prevent-married-women-from-registering-to-vote/
[24] https://www.commoncause.org/articles/the-save-act-five-things-to-know/
[25] https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-save-act-overview-and-facts/
[26] https://www.npr.org/2025/03/12/nx-s1-5301676/save-act-explainer-voter-registration
[27] https://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/newsRoom/pressReleases/2025/20250331SecretariesOfStateLetterSAVEAct.pdf
[28] https://www.cbsnews.com/news/government-shutdown-house-vote-continuing-resolution-save-act/
[29] https://castor.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=404827
[30] https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/house-republicans-vote-funding-bill-shutdown-trump-save-act-rcna171635
[31] https://www.gov.ca.gov/2024/10/14/governor-newsom-signs-legislation-to-prevent-gas-price-spikes-and-save-californians-money/
[32] https://www.aclu.org/news/disability-rights/medicaid-is-a-lifeline-for-people-with-disabilities-congress-must-act-to-save-it

[16] https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/letter-congress-opposing-save-act [17] https://my.lwv.org/ohio/oxford/action-alert/stop-save-act [18] https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/22 [19] https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/voting-rights-groups-challenge-trumps-recent-executive-order [20] https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-save-act-would-disenfranchise-millions-of-citizens/ [21] https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/128/text/is [22] https://www.lwv.org/blog/safeguard-american-voter-eligibility-save-act-trick [23] https://www.factcheck.org/2025/02/will-save-act-prevent-married-women-from-registering-to-vote/ [24] https://www.commoncause.org/articles/the-save-act-five-things-to-know/ [25] https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-save-act-overview-and-facts/ [26] https://www.npr.org/2025/03/12/nx-s1-5301676/save-act-explainer-voter-registration [27] https://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/newsRoom/pressReleases/2025/20250331SecretariesOfStateLetterSAVEAct.pdf [28] https://www.cbsnews.com/news/government-shutdown-house-vote-continuing-resolution-save-act/ [29] https://castor.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=404827 [30] https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/house-republicans-vote-funding-bill-shutdown-trump-save-act-rcna171635 [31] https://www.gov.ca.gov/2024/10/14/governor-newsom-signs-legislation-to-prevent-gas-price-spikes-and-save-californians-money/ [32] https://www.aclu.org/news/disability-rights/medicaid-is-a-lifeline-for-people-with-disabilities-congress-must-act-to-save-it

[33] https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/national-international/gop-save-act-hr-22-strict-proof-citizenship-requirement-voting/3844246/
[34] https://senatedems.com/klinefelt/2025/01/08/michigan-senate-democrats-make-lowering-costs-increasing-access-to-affordable-health-care-a-top-priority-in-2025/
[35] https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2025/02/14/a-texas-republicans-save-act-is-drawing-alarm-what-is-it/
[36] https://campaignlegal.org/update/what-you-need-know-about-save-act
[37] https://economictimes.com/news/international/us/does-the-new-save-act-restrict-married-women-to-vote-in-the-us-heres-what-we-know/articleshow/118609801.cms
[38] https://punchbowl.news/article/house/johnson-cr-save-act-government-funding/
[39] https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/house-republicans-to-prioritize-controversial-save-act-in-new-session/
[40] https://www.wicker.senate.gov/2025/1/senator-wicker-representative-smith-reintroduce-bill-to-support-ending-taxpayer-funded-abortions

#SAVEAct #VoterRegistration #ProofOfCitizenship #VoterID #WomensVotes #MarriedWomen #NameChange #Disenfranchisement #VoterSuppression #VotingRights #USElections #USPolitics #FederalLegislation

[33] https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/national-international/gop-save-act-hr-22-strict-proof-citizenship-requirement-voting/3844246/ [34] https://senatedems.com/klinefelt/2025/01/08/michigan-senate-democrats-make-lowering-costs-increasing-access-to-affordable-health-care-a-top-priority-in-2025/ [35] https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2025/02/14/a-texas-republicans-save-act-is-drawing-alarm-what-is-it/ [36] https://campaignlegal.org/update/what-you-need-know-about-save-act [37] https://economictimes.com/news/international/us/does-the-new-save-act-restrict-married-women-to-vote-in-the-us-heres-what-we-know/articleshow/118609801.cms [38] https://punchbowl.news/article/house/johnson-cr-save-act-government-funding/ [39] https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/house-republicans-to-prioritize-controversial-save-act-in-new-session/ [40] https://www.wicker.senate.gov/2025/1/senator-wicker-representative-smith-reintroduce-bill-to-support-ending-taxpayer-funded-abortions #SAVEAct #VoterRegistration #ProofOfCitizenship #VoterID #WomensVotes #MarriedWomen #NameChange #Disenfranchisement #VoterSuppression #VotingRights #USElections #USPolitics #FederalLegislation

#SAVEAct #VoterRegistration #ProofOfCitizenship #VoterID #WomensVotes #MarriedWomen #NameChange #Disenfranchisement #VoterSuppression #VotingRights #USElections #USPolitics #FederalLegislation

0 0 0 0