Congress is stepping up to tackle wildfire response barriers with the new "Fix Our Forests" bill and the "Torch Act" aimed at helping firefighters cross jurisdictional lines more effectively.
Learn more here
#ClawsonEmeryCounty #UT #CitizenPortal #ClawsonWildfire #FederalLegislation
The Fresno County Board of Supervisors narrowly approved a contentious 2026 federal legislative platform, igniting debate over immigration language and public health priorities.
Read the full story
#FresnoCounty #CA #PublicHealth #ImmigrationPolicy #CitizenPortal #FederalLegislation
The Colorado Forest Health Council is at a crossroads, debating how to tackle federal legislation with limited support while urgent concerns over AmeriCorps funding loom large.
Get the details!
#CO #CivicEngagement #CitizenPortal #FederalLegislation
As enforcement escalates, we need these protections.
Read the details: hudsoncountyview.com/congressman-...
#EndPrivateDetention #DignityNotDetention #ImmigrantRights #FederalLegislation #IndivisibleADKSaratoga
Wake County Schools are facing a financial balancing act for their Child Nutrition Services program as federal changes loom and pandemic-era gains begin to fade.
Click to read more!
#NC #CitizenPortal #ChildNutrition #NorthCarolinaSchools #FederalLegislation
12/13 The regulation solution: APA wants federal legislation requiring:
• Privacy protection
• Advertising restrictions
• Anti-addiction coding
• Suicidal ideation reporting
• Ban on calling chatbots "therapists" or "psychologists"
#Regulation #FederalLegislation
Dallas is navigating a complex federal legislative landscape, advocating fiercely for $15 million in funding for crucial local projects as new laws reshape opportunities and challenges.
Click to read more!
#DallasDallasCounty #TX #CitizenPortal #FederalLegislation #DallasCivicEngagement
Amid celebrations of a centenarian's legacy, Pottawattamie County faces rising concerns over its engineering department and the future of vital infrastructure.
Click to read more!
#PottawattamieCounty #IA #CitizenPortal #CommunityCelebrations #InfrastructureTransparency #FederalLegislation
Yuma County's recent Board of Supervisors meeting unveiled crucial updates on agriculture leadership and significant cuts to federal funding that could reshape our community's future.
Click to read more!
#YumaCounty #AZ #CitizenPortal #AgriculturalPolicy #CommunityEngagement #FederalLegislation
Action Alert! Urge your state U.S. Representative to enforce the U.S. Constitution, restore the balance of power between the federal and state governments, and remove “Motor Voter” election regulations by supporting H.R. 55. #ALElections #FederalUsurpation #FederalLegislation
jbs.org/alert/repeal...
![Will the SAVE Act Disenfranchise Millions of Voters?
The claim in the image about the SAVE Act potentially disenfranchising 69 million women voters appears to be based on concerns regarding the bill's stringent voter registration requirements. The SAVE Act mandates that individuals provide documentary proof of U.S. citizenship, such as a passport or birth certificate, to register to vote in federal elections. This requirement poses challenges for married women who have changed their legal names after marriage, as their birth certificates may not match their current legal names. Approximately 69 million married women in the U.S. could face difficulties under this provision[2][4][5].
Additionally, the act would require voters to present these documents in person, effectively eliminating online, automatic, and mail-in voter registration options. This could disproportionately impact groups with less access to such documentation, including women, trans individuals, low-income citizens, and racial minorities[4][6]. Critics argue that these measures amount to voter suppression rather than addressing voter fraud, which is already illegal and rare[4][6].](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:3epzqefaicyxkh2z3fywbmy5/bafkreihd2nml6r6ipx5t4w7gh7bc3mnlquswjtapseqvmapq7vo2ynfukm)
Will the SAVE Act Disenfranchise Millions of Voters? The claim in the image about the SAVE Act potentially disenfranchising 69 million women voters appears to be based on concerns regarding the bill's stringent voter registration requirements. The SAVE Act mandates that individuals provide documentary proof of U.S. citizenship, such as a passport or birth certificate, to register to vote in federal elections. This requirement poses challenges for married women who have changed their legal names after marriage, as their birth certificates may not match their current legal names. Approximately 69 million married women in the U.S. could face difficulties under this provision[2][4][5]. Additionally, the act would require voters to present these documents in person, effectively eliminating online, automatic, and mail-in voter registration options. This could disproportionately impact groups with less access to such documentation, including women, trans individuals, low-income citizens, and racial minorities[4][6]. Critics argue that these measures amount to voter suppression rather than addressing voter fraud, which is already illegal and rare[4][6].
While the claim that "the press is not covering this" is inaccurate—numerous outlets have reported on the SAVE Act's implications—it is true that the legislation has sparked significant concerns about its potential impact on voting accessibility for millions of Americans[3][5][6]. Citations: [1] https://pplx-res.cloudinary.com/image/upload/v1743539503/user_uploads/wVoWqWVQalCcBqq/Screenshot_20250401_163105_Tribel.jpg [2] https://www.ncsl.org/resources/details/9-things-to-know-about-the-proposed-save-act [3] https://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2025-03-31/save-act-voting-rights-republicans [4] https://nwlc.org/how-the-save-act-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-married-women-and-trans-voters/ [5] https://www.newsweek.com/married-women-stopped-voting-save-act-2029325 [6] https://msmagazine.com/2025/03/26/save-act-voting-rights-women-trans-voters-elections/ [7] https://www.cbsnews.com/news/save-act-voter-registration-citizenship-married-women-name-change/ [8] https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2025/03/04/save-act-prevent-married-women-voting/81200611007/ [9] https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/voting-rights-act-60-congress-could-hit-new-low-save-act [10] https://www.yahoo.com/news/save-act-may-affect-registering-001000874.html [11] https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-save-act-an-attempt-to-restrict-voting-rights/ [12] https://19thnews.org/2025/03/save-act-voting-married-women/ [13] https://my.lwv.org/pennsylvania/central-delaware-county/article/save-act-photo-id-bill-could-disenfranchise-millions-american-women-poor [14] https://democraticwomenscaucus.house.gov/media/press-releases/democratic-womens-caucus-demands-speaker-johnson-scrap-save-act-legislation [15] https://civilrights.org/2025/03/31/watch-civil-rights-leaders-and-impacted-voters-speak-in-opposition-to-the-save-act/
[16] https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/letter-congress-opposing-save-act [17] https://my.lwv.org/ohio/oxford/action-alert/stop-save-act [18] https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/22 [19] https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/voting-rights-groups-challenge-trumps-recent-executive-order [20] https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-save-act-would-disenfranchise-millions-of-citizens/ [21] https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/128/text/is [22] https://www.lwv.org/blog/safeguard-american-voter-eligibility-save-act-trick [23] https://www.factcheck.org/2025/02/will-save-act-prevent-married-women-from-registering-to-vote/ [24] https://www.commoncause.org/articles/the-save-act-five-things-to-know/ [25] https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-save-act-overview-and-facts/ [26] https://www.npr.org/2025/03/12/nx-s1-5301676/save-act-explainer-voter-registration [27] https://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/newsRoom/pressReleases/2025/20250331SecretariesOfStateLetterSAVEAct.pdf [28] https://www.cbsnews.com/news/government-shutdown-house-vote-continuing-resolution-save-act/ [29] https://castor.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=404827 [30] https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/house-republicans-vote-funding-bill-shutdown-trump-save-act-rcna171635 [31] https://www.gov.ca.gov/2024/10/14/governor-newsom-signs-legislation-to-prevent-gas-price-spikes-and-save-californians-money/ [32] https://www.aclu.org/news/disability-rights/medicaid-is-a-lifeline-for-people-with-disabilities-congress-must-act-to-save-it
[33] https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/national-international/gop-save-act-hr-22-strict-proof-citizenship-requirement-voting/3844246/ [34] https://senatedems.com/klinefelt/2025/01/08/michigan-senate-democrats-make-lowering-costs-increasing-access-to-affordable-health-care-a-top-priority-in-2025/ [35] https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2025/02/14/a-texas-republicans-save-act-is-drawing-alarm-what-is-it/ [36] https://campaignlegal.org/update/what-you-need-know-about-save-act [37] https://economictimes.com/news/international/us/does-the-new-save-act-restrict-married-women-to-vote-in-the-us-heres-what-we-know/articleshow/118609801.cms [38] https://punchbowl.news/article/house/johnson-cr-save-act-government-funding/ [39] https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/house-republicans-to-prioritize-controversial-save-act-in-new-session/ [40] https://www.wicker.senate.gov/2025/1/senator-wicker-representative-smith-reintroduce-bill-to-support-ending-taxpayer-funded-abortions #SAVEAct #VoterRegistration #ProofOfCitizenship #VoterID #WomensVotes #MarriedWomen #NameChange #Disenfranchisement #VoterSuppression #VotingRights #USElections #USPolitics #FederalLegislation
#SAVEAct #VoterRegistration #ProofOfCitizenship #VoterID #WomensVotes #MarriedWomen #NameChange #Disenfranchisement #VoterSuppression #VotingRights #USElections #USPolitics #FederalLegislation
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ 1.91%
#StateOfTheUnion #FederalLegislation #ConstitutionalLeadership
This is the world we now live in, where this is a bill for consideration: HB 1875 - Allowing the use of paid sick leave to prepare for or participate in certain immigration proceedings. #Immigration #ImmigrationProceedings #PaidSickLeave #FederalLegislation
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ 1.28%
#PresidentialDebates #PresidentialAnnouncements #FederalLegislation
Political cartoon featuring two lawyers reading a Law journal, the first lawyer says, “What should be done with the title of the Attorney General?” and the second lawyer responds, “Banishment to Nauru Springs to mind”. I can’t quite make out the signature because I don’t have my glasses on but I think the cartoonist is S. Roth.
Hang on a minute! Australia’s #AttorneyGeneral is not required to have legal qualifications! How the bloody hell does that work then?
“There’s no requirement in the #AustralianConstitution or #FederalLegislation for the AG to be a #lawyer.”
michaelwest.com.au/scott-morris...
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ 98.48%
#PresidentialAddress #FederalLegislation #PresidentialRole2024
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ 98.31%
#PresidentialTermHistory #PresidentialAddress #FederalLegislation
Federal legislation needs further amendments to protect children’s privacy
#Canada #Tech #BigTech #ChildPrivacy #TechPolicy #Innovation #BillC27 #Youth #Children #CanadianPolitics #FederalLegislation #Privacy
the-14.com/federal-legi...
