2018 Archives Shohei Ohtani Rookie Coming Attraction #CA1 PSA 10: $279.95 👉 Sell to us collectingall.app 👈 #ShoheiOhtani #RookieCard #PSA10 #BaseballCards #Collectibles
0
0
0
0
Hashtag
#ca1
Advertisement · 728 × 90
@paulmitche11 Reminder for the media... In case of a vacancy after a redistricting, but before those new lines are used, the replacement election is held in the OLD lines. With Doug LaMalfa's unfortunate passing the voters in the old CD1 will be electing his replacement. 7:04 AM • Jan 6, 2026
Via @paulmitchell1p.bsky.social on Twitter
#CA1
The new congressional maps under Proposition 50 don’t take effect until the 2026 midterm election. @governor.ca.gov is expected to call for a special election within the next two weeks by California law.
0
1
0
0
It doesn’t sound crazy to me that we could flip an open R+12 district right now #CA1
0
0
0
0
Out of the first circuit today - a ruling on the NIH cuts. And, wow, what a win!!!Congratulations to all the researchers, scientists, grant recipients and beyond who study *everything* to make this world a better, healthier, more sustainable place to live for all of us. 🧑🔬🔬🧫
#NIH #CA1 #indirectcosts
2
0
0
1
RE: Planned Parenthood Federation of America v. Kennedy #CA1
Don’t get confused by articles blaming affiliates. The language of Section 71113 is purposely vague and overbroad!
It makes it harder for clinics to comply with state plans. GOP politicians know this; they know how reimbursement works!
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Thanks to Congressman Doug Lamalfa, in CA1 288,400 will lose their Medi-Cal health insurance, 31,230 will double their Affordable Care Act premiums, 40,469 will lose Food Stamps.
VOTE LAMALFA OUT
VOTE YES ON PROP 50!
#CA1
0
0
0
0
![Case 1:25-cv-10139-LTS Document 213
Filed 10/03/25 Page 6 of 100
BARRON, Chief Judge. In the wake of the Civil War, our
nation, in 1868, ratified the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution.
The amendment provides, in its first clause, that
"[a]ll persons born or naturalized in the United States, and
subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United
States and of the State wherein they reside." U.S. Const.
amend. XIV, § 1. Nearly a century later, after a thorough review
of our nationality laws, Congress passed § 301(a) (1) of the
Immigration and Nationality Act, codified as 8 U.S.C. $ 1401(a) .
That measure similarly provides that "a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" "shall be (a]
nationalll and citizen(] of the United States." Pub. L. No.
82-414, § 301 (a) (1), 66 Stat. 235, 235 (1952) •
Relying on these longstanding guarantees of birthright
citizenship, a Massachusetts federal district court, in a pair of
consolidated cases, preliminarily enjoined the enforcement and
implementation of Executive Order No. 14160, 90 Fed. Reg. 8449
(Jan. 20, 2025), "Protecting the Meaning and Value of American
Citizenship" (the EO). The EO's "purpose" is to deny birthright citizenship to children born after the EO's effective date if, at the time of their birth, their fathers are not United States
citizens or lawful permanent residents (LPR) and their mothers are
in this
country either (1) unlawfully or (2) temporarily.
-6-](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:j22jo3rt2jtdh2nbaemoprcf/bafkreihavt7haucnpt2ax3li67vosfvoz2ngeedmaqmicbm6jgj64bd6je)
Case 1:25-cv-10139-LTS Document 213 Filed 10/03/25 Page 6 of 100 BARRON, Chief Judge. In the wake of the Civil War, our nation, in 1868, ratified the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The amendment provides, in its first clause, that "[a]ll persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1. Nearly a century later, after a thorough review of our nationality laws, Congress passed § 301(a) (1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, codified as 8 U.S.C. $ 1401(a) . That measure similarly provides that "a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" "shall be (a] nationalll and citizen(] of the United States." Pub. L. No. 82-414, § 301 (a) (1), 66 Stat. 235, 235 (1952) • Relying on these longstanding guarantees of birthright citizenship, a Massachusetts federal district court, in a pair of consolidated cases, preliminarily enjoined the enforcement and implementation of Executive Order No. 14160, 90 Fed. Reg. 8449 (Jan. 20, 2025), "Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship" (the EO). The EO's "purpose" is to deny birthright citizenship to children born after the EO's effective date if, at the time of their birth, their fathers are not United States citizens or lawful permanent residents (LPR) and their mothers are in this country either (1) unlawfully or (2) temporarily. -6-
![Case 1:25-cv-10139-LTS Document 213 Filed 10/03/25 Page 7 of 100
Id. $ 1.
The EO "[e]nforce [s]"
this
"[p]urpose" through
directives to various federal agency heads. Id. $ 3.
The Government' now asks us to reverse the preliminary
injunctions in these cases.
We see no reason to do so.
The
Government is right that the Framers of the Citizenship
Clause
sought to remove the stain of Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19
How.)
393
(1857), which shamefully denied United
States
citizenship to "descendants of Africans who were imported into
this country, and sold as slaves," even when the descendants were born here. Id. at 403. But the Framers chose to accomplish that
just purpose in broad terms, as both the Supreme Court in United
States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), and Congress in
passing $ 1401(a) have recognized. The Government is therefore
wrong to argue that the plaintiffs are not likely to succeed in
showing that the children that the EO covers are citizens of this
country at birth, just as the Government is wrong to argue that
various limits on our remedial power independently require us to
reverse the preliminary injunctions.?
1 For ease of exposition, we refer to the governmental defendants throughout as "the Government."
2 We nonetheless conclude that, given the nature of the underlying claims, the preliminary injunctions may apply only to agency officials,
rather than the agencies themselves.
Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Ctr., Inc., 575 U.s. 320, 327 (2015)
("What our cases demonstrate is that,
'in a proper case, relief
may be given in a court of equity .
.. to prevent an injurious
act by a public officer.'"
(alteration in original) (emphasis
- 7 -](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:j22jo3rt2jtdh2nbaemoprcf/bafkreifz5zyptsvnazyaqu5ymzilytqee2fucxkqruzw54andfit6fktv4)
Case 1:25-cv-10139-LTS Document 213 Filed 10/03/25 Page 7 of 100 Id. $ 1. The EO "[e]nforce [s]" this "[p]urpose" through directives to various federal agency heads. Id. $ 3. The Government' now asks us to reverse the preliminary injunctions in these cases. We see no reason to do so. The Government is right that the Framers of the Citizenship Clause sought to remove the stain of Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), which shamefully denied United States citizenship to "descendants of Africans who were imported into this country, and sold as slaves," even when the descendants were born here. Id. at 403. But the Framers chose to accomplish that just purpose in broad terms, as both the Supreme Court in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), and Congress in passing $ 1401(a) have recognized. The Government is therefore wrong to argue that the plaintiffs are not likely to succeed in showing that the children that the EO covers are citizens of this country at birth, just as the Government is wrong to argue that various limits on our remedial power independently require us to reverse the preliminary injunctions.? 1 For ease of exposition, we refer to the governmental defendants throughout as "the Government." 2 We nonetheless conclude that, given the nature of the underlying claims, the preliminary injunctions may apply only to agency officials, rather than the agencies themselves. Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Ctr., Inc., 575 U.s. 320, 327 (2015) ("What our cases demonstrate is that, 'in a proper case, relief may be given in a court of equity . .. to prevent an injurious act by a public officer.'" (alteration in original) (emphasis - 7 -
Case 1:25-cv-10139-LTS Document 213 Filed 10/03/25 Page 8 of 100 The analysis that follows is necessarily lengthy, as we must address the parties' numerous arguments in each of the cases involved. But the length of our analysis should not be mistaken for a sign that the fundamental question that these cases raise about the scope of birthright citizenship is a difficult one. It is not, which may explain why it has been more than a century since a branch of our government has made as concerted an effort as the Executive Branch now makes to deny Americans their birthright.
Straight out of the gate; forceful language about #birthright #citizenship from #CA1 Chief Judge Barron:
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
1
0
0
0
Beaucoup de promesses de #Helsing à l'occasion de cette Interview sur leur #drone #CA1 'Europa'.
Mais au-delà, ce qui est intéressant ce sont les éléments tangibles :
- S'appuie sur les acquis de Grob
- Qualif sur appareil de banc d'essais, avant une transposition sur la plateforme
6
2
0
0
De novo perineural nets (PNNs) develop in the SR and SLM layers of the CA1 hippocampus following pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus.
doi.org/10.1111/epi....
#epilepsy #ilae #epilepsia #CA1 #epileptogenesis #extracellularmatrix #hippocampus #perineuronalnets
0
0
0
0
Oh yeah, this is what we get from #KevinKiley #CA3. I was invited via email to a phone Town Hall. They only let you in if you RSVP with your name, email and number. They called you. #DougLaMalfa #CA1 can't even be bothered. There is a demonstration outside his Chico office on Fridays
1
0
0
0
Want to know what synaptic plasticity rules operate in-vivo to support learning? Read our new paper, combining computational modeling and analysis of place field trajectories during familiarization to novel environments.
#BTSP #STDP #hippocampus #CA1 #CA3
#FirstBlueskyTweet
24
12
1
0
Post a random picture to Brighton up others' day! I'll start...
#photos #PacificOcean
#CA1
#Sharingphotos
6
0
1
0
A drive along CA Highway 1 is always a lovely reset. This was shot sometime in the spring near Davenport, CA. #pacificocean #water #california #ca1 #drive #photography #travel
14
0
1
0
CALIFORNIA Democratic Candidates - Vulnerable
#CA1 #CA4 #CA8 #CA10 #CA21 #CA22 #CA23 #CA25 #CA39 #CA42 #CA45 #CA48 #CA49 #CA50
#Congress2020 #NoSafeSeats
Shareable FB Post: www.facebook.com/postcards4USA/posts/3110...
Twitter THREAD:...
0
0
1
0
Democratic Candidate #CA01 #CA1
Audrey Denney
http://www.audreyforcongress.com
@audrey4congress
Vs GOP Doug LaMalfa
VOTE NOVEMBER 6
Register by October 22
Apply for Absentee Ballot by October 30
THREAD
0
0
1
0
Democratic Candidates #CA01 #CA1
vs GOP Doug LaMalfa
Audrey Denney
http://www.audreyforcongress.com
@audrey4congress
Jessica Jones Holcombe
http://www.holcombeforcongress.com
@jjonesholcombe
David “Chuck” Peterson
https://x.com/holdcongresacct
Marty...
0
0
1
0
Democratic Candidates #CA01 #CA1
Audrey Denney
http://www.audreyforcongress.com
@audrey4congress
Jessica Jones Holcombe
http://www.holcombeforcongress.com
@jjonesholcombe
David “Chuck” Peterson
https://x.com/holdcongresacct
Marty...
0
0
1
0