WHO report clearly says there are effects and they list them, they just did not have decisive morbidity yet with co factors out.
So like all #nuclown you just claim that means there's no effect.
But the costs alone killed many thousands when the thing required so much to build & clean up.
SMR just loses economy of scale and very reliably costs even more.
$863/kW-year
www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/smrs-...
Worst of every generation method!
#Nuclown grift.
You go convince Sir Humphrey to buy Chinese nuclear reactors.
Promising 9B and charging 48B; there is your true cost multiplier
reneweconomy.com.au/cost-of-uks-...
ZERO chance the public would not end up bailing out a bankrupt lying corporation.
Just throw every #nuclown in the Thames.
#UKpoli
That's #nuclown nonsense. Given the very long response time of nuclear it's not going to effectively back anything up. It's laughably long build time and cost means just improve the grid:
You live in some 20th century phantasy without #demandresponse, #V2G, #sodiumion or #kineticstorage.
#UKpoli
Expensive reactor very VERY expensive fuel cycle. But if anyone can get these neutron embrittlement and career eating machines to Dollar General, it'll be China.
Don't be a #nuclown. #p11b and #oneneutronstripping aren't crushed dreams yet.
Hey #nuclown types
#nuclown are so dumb they'll buy this dip.
I have a whole #nuclown list of those.
