What would you probe with interpretable ToF-SIMS? π€
𧬠Early MDS from biopsies
π¬ Drug response via matrix shifts
π©Έ Bone marrow biomarkers
Paper: pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/...
#MachineLearning #CancerBiology #NewMethod (3/3)
Posts by BIOE Paper
The problem: ECM changes in MDS are real but invisible.
ToF-SIMS sees the molecular fingerprints, but neural nets stay black-boxed.
Fix: Bayesian-tuned networks + SHAP surface the m/z peaks driving each class π¬ (2/3)
Bone marrow whispers in its matrix and now we learned to listen.
From raw ion spectra to disease signatures β Bayesian neural nets + SHAP decode ECM chemistry π§¬π¬
A new @JASMS paper turns black-box classifiers into diagnostic windows on MDS π§΅ (1/3)
What would RNS flag in your PLM pipeline? π€
𧬠Filter low-confidence ESM-2 embeddings
π¬ QC for variant-effect prediction
π§ Sanity-check novel/orphan proteins
Paper: www.nature.com/articles/s41...
#CompBio #DeepLearning #Bioinformatics (3/3)
The problem: protein embeddings are opaque.
Dense vectors from ESM-2 & ProtT5 β no way to know if they capture real biology or collapsed to noise.
Fix: RNS β fraction of synthetic random sequences among a protein's nearest neighbors π¬ (2/3)
Your protein embedding looks fine. But is it biologyβor noise?
From ESM-2 & ProtT5 to synthetic nearest-neighbors β a model-agnostic uncertainty score. π§¬π
New NatureMethods: the Random Neighbor Score (RNS) tells you which to trust. π§΅ (1/3)
What would you annotate with ANNEVO first? π€
𧬠Novel non-model genomes
π¬ Fix gaps in reference annotations
π§ Phylogenetically rare species
Paper: www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Code: github.com/xjtu-omics/A...
#CompBio #DeepLearning #NewMethod (3/3)
The problem: ab initio gene annotation has lagged.
HMM-based tools miss long-range signals + can't learn across diverse genomes.
Fix: ANNEVO β a MoE genomic language model learning distal + evolutionary signal 𧬠(2/3)
Ab initio gene callers used to lag evidence-based pipelines. Not anymore.
From raw DNA β introns β gene structures across 566 species β one MoE language model. π§¬π¬
NatureMethods: ANNEVO jointly models distal + evolutionary signal π§΅ (1/3)
Top barrier in multimodal genomic AI? π€
𧬠Tokenization across DNA/cells/space
π¬ Cross-scale alignment
π§ Interpretability
Share thoughts π
Paper: www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Code: github.com/Translationa...
#CompBio #DeepLearning #SpatialOmics (3/3)
β Siloed models miss cross-scale context
β Tokenization for DNA/cells/space still unsolved
β
Super Transformer bridges all 3 scales via cross-attention
β
Modular design β transfer learning across biology π¬ (2/3)
One framework to unify genomics across scales π§¬π
"Super Transformer": modular cross-attention for multiscale biology
- DNA, scRNA-seq & spatial omics
- Unimodal β multimodal roadmap
- Masked modeling + contrastive learning
π§΅ (1/3)
What would you SMASH image first? π€
π§ Brain lipids at 5 Β΅m
π« Cardiac lipid markers
π¬ Tumor lipid mapping
Share your ideas π
Paper: pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/...
#SpatialOmics #Lipidomics #Bioinformatics
(3/3)
β Standard MALDI-MSI: one polarity, one scan, limited info
β High-res imaging destroys sample fast
β
SMASH reuses same pixels across 8 serial layers
β
PASEF enables MS2 lipid ID at 5 Β΅m
β
Spatial correlation validates across layers
(2/3)
π§¬π¬ SMASH Imaging maps 400+ lipids on ONE tissue section!
Serial MALDI-MSI strategy:
- Dual-polarity + MS2 on same pixels
- 30 Β΅m β 5 Β΅m resolution
- 8 imaging layers from 1 section
π§΅ (1/3)
Where would you use sub-5Β΅m SIMS?
π§ Brain lipid circuits
π¦ Single-cell metabolomics
π Drug tissue distribution
π¬ Correlative imaging
Reply with your use case π
Paper: pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/...
#SpatialOmics #BioImaging #Bioinformatics (4/4)
Challenges in SIMS imaging:
β Raster SIMS: slow, sequential
β High-res: tiny FOV
β Speed vs. resolution tradeoff
New microscope-mode solves it:
β
All ions at once
β
<5 Β΅m + m/Ξm ~6900
β
mm tissue in minutes
Maps lipids + amino acids (3/4)
Old SIMS: good pixels, poor chemistry (~2000 m/Ξm).
New instrument reveals:
WHERE: entire mm-scale tissue sections
WHEN: minutes per image
HOW: pulsed TOF + fast scintillator β 6900 m/Ξm
Lipids + amino acids, both resolved. (2/4)
π¬ Map every lipid in a brain slice at sub-5 Β΅m resolution β in minutes.
Microscope-mode SIMS: all ions imaged simultaneously, no raster scan.
- <5 Β΅m spatial resolution
- m/Ξm ~6900 mass resolution
- mm-scale tissue in minutes
π§΅ (1/4)
What dynamics would you reconstruct?
π§ Brain development/regeneration
π« Heart morphogenesis
π¦ Limb regeneration
𧬠Tumor invasion over time
πͺΊ Organoid growth
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Key innovation: End-to-end spatiotemporal reconstruction
Result: Continuous trajectories showing differentiation + proliferation + migration simultaneously
Not just "pseudotime"βactual physical-space dynamics
Why this matters for developmental & regenerative biology:
- Track WHERE cells migrate in physical space
- See HOW phenotype transitions couple with spatial movement
- Handle real data messiness (in different coordinate systems)
- Works in 3D reconstruction
Reconstruct cell migration, differentiation & proliferation from spatial snapshots π¬
stVCR: A generative deep learning framework that "plays back" tissue dynamics from time-series spatial transcriptomics
Aligning samples across different coordinate systems or time points
What's your biggest segmentation challenge?
π§ Complex brain anatomy (many subregions)
π¬ Tumor heterogeneity (cancer vs. necrosis vs. healthy)
π Choosing cluster numbers (k=?)
π Fragmented results
pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/...
#MassSpec #SpatialOmics #DeepLearning #Metabolomics
(4/4)
Key innovation: Dual-consistency learning
Challenge: MSI has high dimensions + nonlinear variation + tissue heterogeneity
MSInet solves both:
- Contrastive learning β global semantic relationships
- Superpixel refinement β local spatial consistency
(3/4)
Why this matters for spatial metabolomics:
- No predefined cluster numbers needed (self-supervised)
- Preserves spatial continuity (no fragmented segments)
- Works across platforms: MALDI-MSI, DESI-MSI
- Biologically meaningful boundaries (matches histology)
(2/4)
Mass spectrometry imaging segmentation just got a self-supervised upgradeπ¬
MSInet: Annotation-free spatial segmentation combining:
- Patch-wise contrastive learning (global context)
- Superpixel-guided refinement (local boundaries)
Outperforms t-SNE+k-means, CNNAE, GCN-based methods by ~26%
(1/4)
What "undruggable" target would you tackle first?
Reply with:
π― Your target protein
𧬠Disease area
π Why it's been hard to drug
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
#DrugDiscovery #AlphaFold
Innovation: Repurposes AlphaFold2's learned representations for binding site prediction
Challenge: Previous methods need homology models OR known ligands OR multiple sequence alignments
AF2BIND: Just needs protein sequence β AF2 embeddings β logistic regression β binding sites
Why this matters for drug discovery:
- Predict binding sites WITHOUT known similar proteins (true de novo)
- Works on "undruggable" targets with no structural homologs
- Thousands of new therapeutic sites identified
- Predicts ligand chemical properties from binding pocket features